在C。

int;

(&a)[0] = 10;/*将值10赋给*/

[0]等于*(&a +0)得到*(&a)也就是a。

交替:在许多语言中的事物之间交替:

boolean b = true;
for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
  if(b = !b)
    print i;

乍一看，b怎么可能不等于它自己呢? 这实际上只会打印奇数

INTERCAL可能是最奇怪的语言特征的最佳汇编。我个人最喜欢的是COMEFROM语句，它(几乎)与GOTO相反。

COMEFROM is roughly the opposite of GOTO in that it can take the execution state from any arbitrary point in code to a COMEFROM statement. The point in code where the state transfer happens is usually given as a parameter to COMEFROM. Whether the transfer happens before or after the instruction at the specified transfer point depends on the language used. Depending on the language used, multiple COMEFROMs referencing the same departure point may be invalid, be non-deterministic, be executed in some sort of defined priority, or even induce parallel or otherwise concurrent execution as seen in Threaded Intercal. A simple example of a "COMEFROM x" statement is a label x (which does not need to be physically located anywhere near its corresponding COMEFROM) that acts as a "trap door". When code execution reaches the label, control gets passed to the statement following the COMEFROM. The effect of this is primarily to make debugging (and understanding the control flow of the program) extremely difficult, since there is no indication near the label that control will mysteriously jump to another point of the program.

这缺少了一个奇怪的特性:Python没有switch语句(尽管存在变通方法)。

ActionScript 3:

当一个对象被它的接口使用时，编译器不识别从object继承的方法，因此:

IInterface interface = getInterface();
interface.toString();

给出一个编译错误。 解决方法是将类型转换为Object

Object(interface).toString();

PHP:

． 和+运算符。它有其合理的解释，但“a”+“5”= 5仍然显得尴尬。

Java(以及任何IEEE754的实现):

System.out.println(0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1);

输出0.9999999999999999

PHP

PHP对实例变量和方法的重载处理不一致。考虑:

class Foo
{
    private $var = 'avalue';

    private function doStuff()
    {
        return "Stuff";
    }

    public function __get($var)
    {
        return $this->$var;
    }

    public function __call($func, array $args = array())
    {
        return call_user_func_array(array($this, $func), $args);
    }
}

$foo = new Foo;
var_dump($foo->var);
var_dump($foo->doStuff());

转储$var是有效的。即使$var是私有的，__get()也会被任何不存在或不可访问的成员调用，并返回正确的值。这不是doStuff()的情况，它失败于:

Fatal error: Call to private method Foo::doStuff() from context ”.”

我认为其中很多都是在c风格的语言中工作的，但我不确定。

Pass a here document as a function argument: function foo($message) { echo $message . "\n"; } foo(<<<EOF Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nunc blandit sem eleifend libero rhoncus iaculis. Nullam eget nisi at purus vestibulum tristique eu sit amet lorem. EOF ); You can assign a variable in an argument list. foo($message = "Hello"); echo $message; This works because an assignment is an expression which returns the assigned value. It’s the cause of one of the most common C-style bugs, performing an assignment instead of a comparison.

Python

在Python中，可变的默认函数参数会导致意想不到的结果:

def append(thing, collection=[]):
    collection.append(thing)
    return collection

print append("foo")
# -> ['foo']
print append("bar")
# -> ['foo', 'bar']
print append("baz", [])
# -> ['baz']
print append("quux")
# -> ['foo', 'bar', 'quux']

空列表是在函数定义时初始化的，而不是在调用时初始化的，因此对它的任何更改都会在函数调用之间保持不变。

MySQL的大小写敏感性

MySQL有非常不寻常的区分大小写的规则:表区分大小写，列名和字符串值不区分大小写:

mysql> CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE Foo (name varchar(128) NOT NULL);
DESCRIBE foo;
ERROR 1146 (42S02): Table 'foo' doesn't exist
mysql> DESCRIBE Foo;
+-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| Field | Type         | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| name  | varchar(128) | NO   |     | NULL    |       |
+-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
1 row in set (0.06 sec)
mysql> INSERT INTO Foo (`name`) VALUES ('bar'), ('baz');
Query OK, 2 row affected (0.05 sec)

mysql> SELECT * FROM Foo WHERE name = 'BAR';
+------+
| name |
+------+
| bar  |
+------+
1 row in set (0.12 sec)

mysql> SELECT * FROM Foo WHERE name = 'bAr';
+------+
| name |
+------+
| bar  |
+------+
1 row in set (0.05 sec)