在JavaScript中，方法的结果取决于所放置的样式花括号。这是K&R风格，其中括号放在方法签名之后和return语句之后:

var foo = function() {
  return {
    key: 'value'
  };
}

foo() // returns an object here

现在，如果我将这段代码格式化为Allman风格，其中括号总是放在新行上，结果是不同的:

var foo = function()
{
  return
  {
    key: 'value'
  };
}

foo() // returns undefined here

如何来吗?在JavaScript中，如果您不自己做，语言会自动在每行末尾放置分号。所以在最后一个代码片段中真正发生的是这样的:

var foo = function()
{
  return; // here's actually a semicolon, automatically set by JavaScript!
  {
    key: 'value'
  };
}

因此，如果调用foo()，方法中的第一个语句将是一个返回语句，该语句将返回undefined，并且不会执行后面的其他语句。

INTERCAL可能是最奇怪的语言特征的最佳汇编。我个人最喜欢的是COMEFROM语句，它(几乎)与GOTO相反。

COMEFROM is roughly the opposite of GOTO in that it can take the execution state from any arbitrary point in code to a COMEFROM statement. The point in code where the state transfer happens is usually given as a parameter to COMEFROM. Whether the transfer happens before or after the instruction at the specified transfer point depends on the language used. Depending on the language used, multiple COMEFROMs referencing the same departure point may be invalid, be non-deterministic, be executed in some sort of defined priority, or even induce parallel or otherwise concurrent execution as seen in Threaded Intercal. A simple example of a "COMEFROM x" statement is a label x (which does not need to be physically located anywhere near its corresponding COMEFROM) that acts as a "trap door". When code execution reaches the label, control gets passed to the statement following the COMEFROM. The effect of this is primarily to make debugging (and understanding the control flow of the program) extremely difficult, since there is no indication near the label that control will mysteriously jump to another point of the program.

在JavaScript中，方法的结果取决于所放置的样式花括号。这是K&R风格，其中括号放在方法签名之后和return语句之后:

var foo = function() {
  return {
    key: 'value'
  };
}

foo() // returns an object here

现在，如果我将这段代码格式化为Allman风格，其中括号总是放在新行上，结果是不同的:

var foo = function()
{
  return
  {
    key: 'value'
  };
}

foo() // returns undefined here

如何来吗?在JavaScript中，如果您不自己做，语言会自动在每行末尾放置分号。所以在最后一个代码片段中真正发生的是这样的:

var foo = function()
{
  return; // here's actually a semicolon, automatically set by JavaScript!
  {
    key: 'value'
  };
}

因此，如果调用foo()，方法中的第一个语句将是一个返回语句，该语句将返回undefined，并且不会执行后面的其他语句。

下面的答案与这个关于数组的答案类似。

在Powershell中，像其他动态语言一样，字符串和数字在某种程度上是可以互换的。然而，Powershell无法下定决心。

PS> $a = "4"    # string
PS> $a * 3      # Python can do this, too
444
PS> 3 * $a      # Python doesn't do it this way, string repetition is commutative
12
PS> $a + 3      # Python gives a mismatched types error
43
PS> 3 + $a      # Python would give an error here, too
7

如果变量是整数而不是字符串，则操作是可交换的。

PS> $a = 4      # integer
PS> $a * 3
12
PS> 3 * $a
12
PS> $a + 3
7
PS> 3 + $a
7

当有疑问时，做一个模型:

PS> $a = "4"
PS> $b = 3
PS> [int] $a * [int] $b
12

你也可以使用[float]。

Algol通过名称传递(使用C语法说明):

int a[3] = { 1, 2, 3 };
int i = 1;

void f(int j)
{
    int k;
    k = j;  // k = 2
    i = 0;
    k = j;  // k = 1 (!?!)    
}

int main()
{
    f(a[i]);
}

在JavaScript中:

2 == [2]

// Even stranger
2 == [[[2]]]

// And down-right nutty
var a = { "abc" : 1 };
a[[[["abc"]]]] === a["abc"]; // this is also true

幸运的是，stackoverflow.com网站上善良的人们向我解释了这一切: 为什么2 ==[2]在JavaScript?