c++(或Java)中没有封装的事实。任何对象都可以违反任何其他对象的封装，破坏它的私有数据，只要它是相同的类型。例如:

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

class X
{
  public:
    // Construct by passing internal value
    X (int i) : i (i) {}

    // This breaks encapsulation
    void violate (X & other)
    {
        other.i += i;
    }

    int get () { return i; }

  private:
    int i;
};

int main (int ac, char * av[])
{
    X a(1), b(2), c(3);

    a.violate (c);
    b.violate (c);
    cout << c.get() << endl;    // "6"
}

在PHP中:

echo 'foo' == 0;    // echos '1'
echo 'foo' == true; // echos '1'
echo 0 == true;     // echos '0'
$foo = 'foo';
echo $foo['bar']    // echos 'f'

PHP有一些最烦人的类型强制转换…

BrainFuck语言。真的是这样!

来自边远吗?

我在试图找出一个完全没有意义但无论如何都能工作的MACRO时遇到了这个。这对于objective-c是正确的，但对于其他类型的C(或者至少是gcc编译器)也可能是正确的。

NSString *oneString = @"This " @"is " @"just " @"one " @"normal " @" string";

=

NSString *oneString = @"This is just one normal string";

C风格的字符串也是如此

char* str = "this " "also " "works";

A very tiny thing that annoyed me in COBOL was that there was no dedicated modulo operation. Instead you could do a division specifying that you only wanted whole number results and store the rest in a different variable. Since COBOL is very sensitive when it comes to variables that means that you ended up with a variable you didn't really need, i.e. the actual result of the division. This is the story of how I once named a variable "USELESS" - that was the most appropriate name I could think of.