JavaScript八进制转换“特性”是一个很好的了解:

parseInt('06') // 6
parseInt('07') // 7
parseInt('08') // 0
parseInt('09') // 0
parseInt('10') // 10

详情请点击这里。

Java;使所有对象实例都是互斥对象。

我最喜欢的c++语法小技巧是，你可以把URL(有一些限制)直接放到代码中:

int main( int argc, char *argv[] )
{
    int i=10;

    http://www.stackoverflow.com
    return 1;
}

这可以很好地编译。

语法高亮有点破坏了这个笑话，但它仍然很有趣。

这并不奇怪或令人惊讶，但这让我总是说WTF:

语法或标识符名称的大小写敏感性。

大多数具有它的语言似乎只是因为C具有它。这样做没有什么好的理由。

INTERCAL可能是最奇怪的语言特征的最佳汇编。我个人最喜欢的是COMEFROM语句，它(几乎)与GOTO相反。

COMEFROM is roughly the opposite of GOTO in that it can take the execution state from any arbitrary point in code to a COMEFROM statement. The point in code where the state transfer happens is usually given as a parameter to COMEFROM. Whether the transfer happens before or after the instruction at the specified transfer point depends on the language used. Depending on the language used, multiple COMEFROMs referencing the same departure point may be invalid, be non-deterministic, be executed in some sort of defined priority, or even induce parallel or otherwise concurrent execution as seen in Threaded Intercal. A simple example of a "COMEFROM x" statement is a label x (which does not need to be physically located anywhere near its corresponding COMEFROM) that acts as a "trap door". When code execution reaches the label, control gets passed to the statement following the COMEFROM. The effect of this is primarily to make debugging (and understanding the control flow of the program) extremely difficult, since there is no indication near the label that control will mysteriously jump to another point of the program.

这个古老的PHP宠儿本身并不完全是WTFish，但作用域解析错误是许多开发人员看到的事情之一，值得给一些WTF的爱:

$class = new StdClass();
$class::test();

PHP Parse error:  syntax error, unexpected T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM on line 3