这并不奇怪或令人惊讶，但这让我总是说WTF:

语法或标识符名称的大小写敏感性。

大多数具有它的语言似乎只是因为C具有它。这样做没有什么好的理由。

COMEFROM是我见过的最奇怪，也可能是最没用的语言功能。

其次是三元运算符，因为它违反了优化的第一条规则。它带来的危害大于它解决的问题。它的危害更大，因为它使代码可读性更差。

并不是一个真正的语言功能，但有趣/很棒的功能使用是Duff的设备。

BrainFuck语言。真的是这样!

这并不是说它被大量使用，而是c++的“返回对静态大小数组的引用”的语法很奇怪:

struct SuperFoo {
  int (&getFoo() const)[10] {
    static int foo[10];
    return foo;
  }
}

在上述情况下，Ofc方法可以声明为静态const

INTERCAL可能是最奇怪的语言特征的最佳汇编。我个人最喜欢的是COMEFROM语句，它(几乎)与GOTO相反。

COMEFROM is roughly the opposite of GOTO in that it can take the execution state from any arbitrary point in code to a COMEFROM statement. The point in code where the state transfer happens is usually given as a parameter to COMEFROM. Whether the transfer happens before or after the instruction at the specified transfer point depends on the language used. Depending on the language used, multiple COMEFROMs referencing the same departure point may be invalid, be non-deterministic, be executed in some sort of defined priority, or even induce parallel or otherwise concurrent execution as seen in Threaded Intercal. A simple example of a "COMEFROM x" statement is a label x (which does not need to be physically located anywhere near its corresponding COMEFROM) that acts as a "trap door". When code execution reaches the label, control gets passed to the statement following the COMEFROM. The effect of this is primarily to make debugging (and understanding the control flow of the program) extremely difficult, since there is no indication near the label that control will mysteriously jump to another point of the program.

这缺少了一个奇怪的特性:Python没有switch语句(尽管存在变通方法)。