使用@@IDENTITY代替SCOPE_IDENTITY()

引自以下回答:

@@IDENTITY returns the last identity value generated for any table in the current session, across all scopes. You need to be careful here, since it's across scopes. You could get a value from a trigger, instead of your current statement. SCOPE_IDENTITY returns the last identity value generated for any table in the current session and the current scope. Generally what you want to use. IDENT_CURRENT returns the last identity value generated for a specific table in any session and any scope. This lets you specify which table you want the value from, in case the two above aren't quite what you need (very rare). You could use this if you want to get the current IDENTITY value for a table that you have not inserted a record into.

我发现，在性能方面，有两点是最重要的，并且可能会有很大的成本:

使用游标而不是基于集合 表达式。我想当程序员以过程的方式思考时，这种情况经常发生。 使用相关子查询，当a 连接到派生表可以执行 的工作。

使用无意义的表别名:

from employee t1,
department t2,
job t3,
...

使得阅读一个大的SQL语句比它需要的要困难得多

有一张桌子

code_1
value_1
code_2
value_2
...
code_10
value_10

而不是有3个表

Code, value和code_value

你永远不知道什么时候你可能需要10对以上的代码，价值。

如果只需要一对，就不会浪费磁盘空间。

临时表滥用。

特别是这类事情:

SELECT personid, firstname, lastname, age
INTO #tmpPeople
FROM People
WHERE lastname like 's%'

DELETE FROM #tmpPeople
WHERE firstname = 'John'

DELETE FROM #tmpPeople
WHERE firstname = 'Jon'

DELETE FROM #tmpPeople
WHERE age > 35

UPDATE People
SET firstname = 'Fred'
WHERE personid IN (SELECT personid from #tmpPeople)

不要从查询中构建临时表，只是为了删除不需要的行。

是的，我在生产db中看到过这种形式的代码页。

我最不喜欢的是

Using spaces when creating tables, sprocs etc. I'm fine with CamelCase or under_scores and singular or plurals and UPPERCASE or lowercase but having to refer to a table or column [with spaces], especially if [ it is oddly spaced] (yes, I've run into this) really irritates me. Denormalized data. A table doesn't have to be perfectly normalized, but when I run into a table of employees that has information about their current evaluation score or their primary anything, it tells me that I will probably need to make a separate table at some point and then try to keep them synced. I will normalize the data first and then if I see a place where denormalization helps, I'll consider it. Overuse of either views or cursors. Views have a purpose, but when each table is wrapped in a view it's too much. I've had to use cursors a few times, but generally you can use other mechanisms for this. Access. Can a program be an anti-pattern? We have SQL Server at my work, but a number of people use access due to it's availabilty, "ease of use" and "friendliness" to non-technical users. There is too much here to go into, but if you've been in a similar environment, you know.