没有直接的生命周期方法来告诉你整个应用程序何时进入后台或前台。

我用简单的方法做了这件事。按照下面的说明检测应用程序后台/前台阶段。

只要有一点变通办法，这是可能的。在这里，ActivityLifecycleCallbacks可以救场。让我一步一步来。

First, create a class that extends the android.app.Application and implements the ActivityLifecycleCallbacks interface. In the Application.onCreate(), register the callback. public class App extends Application implements Application.ActivityLifecycleCallbacks { @Override public void onCreate() { super.onCreate(); registerActivityLifecycleCallbacks(this); } } Register the “App” class in the Manifest as below, <application android:name=".App". There will be at least one Activity in the started state when the app is in the foreground and there will be no Activity in the started state when the app is in the background. Declare 2 variables as below in the “App” class. private int activityReferences = 0; private boolean isActivityChangingConfigurations = false; activityReferences will keep the count of number of activities in the started state. isActivityChangingConfigurations is a flag to indicate if the current Activity is going through configuration change like an orientation switch. Using the following code you can detect if the App comes foreground. @Override public void onActivityStarted(Activity activity) { if (++activityReferences == 1 && !isActivityChangingConfigurations) { // App enters foreground } } This is how to detect if the App goes background. @Override public void onActivityStopped(Activity activity) { isActivityChangingConfigurations = activity.isChangingConfigurations(); if (--activityReferences == 0 && !isActivityChangingConfigurations) { // App enters background } }

工作原理:

这是按顺序调用Lifecycle方法的一个小技巧。让我来演练一个场景。

假设用户启动了应用程序，启动器活动A被启动。生命周期调用将是，

A.onCreate () A.onStart() (++activityReferences == 1)(应用程序进入前台) A.onResume ()

现在活动A启动活动B。

A.onPause () B.onCreate () B.onStart() (++activityReferences == 2) B.onResume () A.onStop()(——activityReferences == 1)

然后用户从活动B导航回来，

B.onPause () A.onStart() (++activityReferences == 2) A.onResume () B.onStop()(——activityReferences == 1) B.onDestroy ()

然后用户按Home键，

A.onPause () A.onStop()(——activityReferences == 0)(应用程序进入后台)

在这种情况下，如果用户从活动B按Home键而不是后退键，它仍然是一样的，activityReferences将是0。因此，我们可以检测作为应用程序进入后台。

那么，isActivityChangingConfigurations的角色是什么?在上面的场景中，假设活动B改变了方向。回调序列将是，

B.onPause () B.onStop()(——activityReferences == 0)(应用程序进入后台??) B.onDestroy () B.onCreate () B.onStart() (++activityReferences == 1)(应用程序进入前台??) B.onResume ()

这就是为什么我们有一个额外的isActivityChangingConfigurations检查，以避免活动正在经历配置更改的场景。

正确答案

创建名为MyApp的类，如下所示:

public class MyApp implements Application.ActivityLifecycleCallbacks, ComponentCallbacks2 {

    private Context context;
    public void setContext(Context context)
    {
        this.context = context;
    }

    private boolean isInBackground = false;

    @Override
    public void onTrimMemory(final int level) {
        if (level == ComponentCallbacks2.TRIM_MEMORY_UI_HIDDEN) {


            isInBackground = true;
            Log.d("status = ","we are out");
        }
    }


    @Override
    public void onActivityCreated(Activity activity, Bundle bundle) {

    }

    @Override
    public void onActivityStarted(Activity activity) {

    }

    @Override
    public void onActivityResumed(Activity activity) {

        if(isInBackground){

            isInBackground = false;
            Log.d("status = ","we are in");
        }

    }

    @Override
    public void onActivityPaused(Activity activity) {

    }

    @Override
    public void onActivityStopped(Activity activity) {

    }

    @Override
    public void onActivitySaveInstanceState(Activity activity, Bundle bundle) {

    }

    @Override
    public void onActivityDestroyed(Activity activity) {

    }

    @Override
    public void onConfigurationChanged(Configuration configuration) {

    }

    @Override
    public void onLowMemory() {

    }
}

然后，在你想要的任何地方(最好是在应用程序中启动的第一个活动)，添加下面的代码:

MyApp myApp = new MyApp();
registerComponentCallbacks(myApp);
getApplication().registerActivityLifecycleCallbacks(myApp);

完成了!现在当应用程序在后台时，我们得到日志状态:我们退出 当我们进入app，我们得到log status，我们是out

我在谷歌Analytics EasyTracker中使用了这个，它起作用了。可以将其扩展为使用简单整数来完成您想要的任务。

public class MainApplication extends Application {

    int isAppBackgrounded = 0;

    @Override
    public void onCreate() {
        super.onCreate();
        appBackgroundedDetector();
    }

    private void appBackgroundedDetector() {
        registerActivityLifecycleCallbacks(new ActivityLifecycleCallbacks() {
            @Override
            public void onActivityCreated(Activity activity, Bundle bundle) {

            }

            @Override
            public void onActivityStarted(Activity activity) {
                EasyTracker.getInstance(MainApplication.this).activityStart(activity);
            }

            @Override
            public void onActivityResumed(Activity activity) {
                isAppBackgrounded++;
                if (isAppBackgrounded > 0) {
                    // Do something here
                }
            }

            @Override
            public void onActivityPaused(Activity activity) {
                isAppBackgrounded--;
            }

            @Override
            public void onActivityStopped(Activity activity) {
                EasyTracker.getInstance(MainApplication.this).activityStop(activity);
            }

            @Override
            public void onActivitySaveInstanceState(Activity activity, Bundle bundle) {

            }

            @Override
            public void onActivityDestroyed(Activity activity) {

            }
        });
    }
}

考虑使用onUserLeaveHint。它只会在应用进入后台时被调用。onPause会有一些极端情况需要处理，因为它可以被用于其他原因;例如，如果用户在你的应用程序中打开另一个活动，比如你的设置页面，你的主活动的onPause方法将被调用，即使它们仍然在你的应用程序中;当你可以简单地使用onUserLeaveHint回调函数来做你所要求的事情时，跟踪正在进行的事情将导致错误。

当调用on UserLeaveHint时，你可以设置一个boolean inBackground标志为true。当onResume被调用时，如果inBackground标志被设置，只假设你回到前台。这是因为onResume也将被调用在你的主要活动，如果用户只是在你的设置菜单，从来没有离开应用程序。

Remember that if the user hits the home button while in your settings screen, onUserLeaveHint will be called in your settings activity, and when they return onResume will be called in your settings activity. If you only have this detection code in your main activity you will miss this use case. To have this code in all your activities without duplicating code, have an abstract activity class which extends Activity, and put your common code in it. Then each activity you have can extend this abstract activity.

例如:

public abstract AbstractActivity extends Activity {
    private static boolean inBackground = false;

    @Override
    public void onResume() {
        if (inBackground) {
            // You just came from the background
            inBackground = false;
        }
        else {
            // You just returned from another activity within your own app
        }
    }

    @Override
    public void onUserLeaveHint() {
        inBackground = true;
    }
}

public abstract MainActivity extends AbstractActivity {
    ...
}

public abstract SettingsActivity extends AbstractActivity {
    ...
}

我喜欢ProcessLifecycleOwner方法，但实际上可以跳过所有这些，因为在Activity的onCreate()方法中，可以很容易地确定它是第一次运行还是后续运行:

@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
    if (savedInstanceState == null) {
        /* savedInstanceState is always null on first run */
    } else {
        /* it's a subsequent run */
    }
}

lifecycle包提供了类和接口，让您可以构建生命周期感知的组件

您的应用程序应该实现LifecycleObserver接口:

public class MyApplication extends Application implements LifecycleObserver {

    @Override
    public void onCreate() {
        super.onCreate();
        ProcessLifecycleOwner.get().getLifecycle().addObserver(this);
    }

    @OnLifecycleEvent(Lifecycle.Event.ON_STOP)
    private void onAppBackgrounded() {
        Log.d("MyApp", "App in background");
    }

    @OnLifecycleEvent(Lifecycle.Event.ON_START)
    private void onAppForegrounded() {
        Log.d("MyApp", "App in foreground");
    }
}

为此，您需要将此依赖项添加到构建中。gradle文件:

dependencies {
    implementation "android.arch.lifecycle:extensions:1.1.1"
}

正如谷歌所建议的，你应该最小化在activity的生命周期方法中执行的代码:

一种常见的模式是实现依赖的操作 活动和片段的生命周期方法中的组件。 然而，这种模式会导致代码组织不佳，并且导致 错误的扩散。通过使用生命周期感知组件，您 是否可以将依赖组件的代码移出生命周期方法 以及组件本身。

你可以在这里阅读更多: https://developer.android.com/topic/libraries/architecture/lifecycle