微软应该为INotifyPropertyChanged实现一些时髦的东西,就像在自动属性中,只需要指定{get;设置;通知;} 我认为这样做很有意义。或者做这个手术有什么并发症吗?
我们能在属性中实现类似notify的东西吗。在你的类中实现INotifyPropertyChanged是否有一个优雅的解决方案,或者唯一的方法是在每个属性中引发PropertyChanged事件。
如果不是,我们可以写一些东西来自动生成一段代码来引发PropertyChanged事件?
微软应该为INotifyPropertyChanged实现一些时髦的东西,就像在自动属性中,只需要指定{get;设置;通知;} 我认为这样做很有意义。或者做这个手术有什么并发症吗?
我们能在属性中实现类似notify的东西吗。在你的类中实现INotifyPropertyChanged是否有一个优雅的解决方案,或者唯一的方法是在每个属性中引发PropertyChanged事件。
如果不是,我们可以写一些东西来自动生成一段代码来引发PropertyChanged事件?
当前回答
另一个组合解决方案是使用StackFrame:
public class BaseViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected void Set<T>(ref T field, T value)
{
MethodBase method = new StackFrame(1).GetMethod();
field = value;
Raise(method.Name.Substring(4));
}
protected void Raise(string propertyName)
{
var temp = PropertyChanged;
if (temp != null)
{
temp(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
}
用法:
public class TempVM : BaseViewModel
{
private int _intP;
public int IntP
{
get { return _intP; }
set { Set<int>(ref _intP, value); }
}
}
其他回答
没有使用postsharp之类的东西,我使用的最小版本使用如下内容:
public class Data : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
// boiler-plate
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
PropertyChangedEventHandler handler = PropertyChanged;
if (handler != null) handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
protected bool SetField<T>(ref T field, T value, string propertyName)
{
if (EqualityComparer<T>.Default.Equals(field, value)) return false;
field = value;
OnPropertyChanged(propertyName);
return true;
}
// props
private string name;
public string Name
{
get { return name; }
set { SetField(ref name, value, "Name"); }
}
}
每个属性就像这样:
private string name;
public string Name
{
get { return name; }
set { SetField(ref name, value, "Name"); }
}
这并不大;如果需要,它也可以用作基类。SetField的bool返回值告诉你它是否为no-op,以防你想应用其他逻辑。
或者用c# 5更简单:
protected bool SetField<T>(ref T field, T value,
[CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{...}
可以这样称呼:
set { SetField(ref name, value); }
编译器会自动添加“Name”。
c# 6.0使实现更容易:
protected void OnPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
...现在是c# 7:
protected void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
=> PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
protected bool SetField<T>(ref T field, T value,[CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
if (EqualityComparer<T>.Default.Equals(field, value)) return false;
field = value;
OnPropertyChanged(propertyName);
return true;
}
private string name;
public string Name
{
get => name;
set => SetField(ref name, value);
}
并且,使用c# 8和Nullable引用类型,它看起来像这样:
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler? PropertyChanged;
protected void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName) => PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
protected bool SetField<T>(ref T field, T value, [CallerMemberName] string propertyName = "")
{
if (EqualityComparer<T>.Default.Equals(field, value)) return false;
field = value;
OnPropertyChanged(propertyName);
return true;
}
private string name;
public string Name
{
get => name;
set => SetField(ref name, value);
}
这就是大规模的过度工程。这比仅仅以正确的方式进行要复杂得多,而且几乎没有任何好处。如果你的IDE支持代码片段(Visual Studio/MonoDevelop支持),那么你可以让这个实现变得非常简单。你需要输入的只是属性的类型和属性名。额外的三行代码将自动生成。
使用这个
using System;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Reflection.Emit;
using System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging;
using System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies;
public static class ObservableFactory
{
public static T Create<T>(T target)
{
if (!typeof(T).IsInterface)
throw new ArgumentException("Target should be an interface", "target");
var proxy = new Observable<T>(target);
return (T)proxy.GetTransparentProxy();
}
}
internal class Observable<T> : RealProxy, INotifyPropertyChanged, INotifyPropertyChanging
{
private readonly T target;
internal Observable(T target)
: base(ImplementINotify(typeof(T)))
{
this.target = target;
}
public override IMessage Invoke(IMessage msg)
{
var methodCall = msg as IMethodCallMessage;
if (methodCall != null)
{
return HandleMethodCall(methodCall);
}
return null;
}
public event PropertyChangingEventHandler PropertyChanging;
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
IMessage HandleMethodCall(IMethodCallMessage methodCall)
{
var isPropertySetterCall = methodCall.MethodName.StartsWith("set_");
var propertyName = isPropertySetterCall ? methodCall.MethodName.Substring(4) : null;
if (isPropertySetterCall)
{
OnPropertyChanging(propertyName);
}
try
{
object methodCalltarget = target;
if (methodCall.MethodName == "add_PropertyChanged" || methodCall.MethodName == "remove_PropertyChanged"||
methodCall.MethodName == "add_PropertyChanging" || methodCall.MethodName == "remove_PropertyChanging")
{
methodCalltarget = this;
}
var result = methodCall.MethodBase.Invoke(methodCalltarget, methodCall.InArgs);
if (isPropertySetterCall)
{
OnPropertyChanged(methodCall.MethodName.Substring(4));
}
return new ReturnMessage(result, null, 0, methodCall.LogicalCallContext, methodCall);
}
catch (TargetInvocationException invocationException)
{
var exception = invocationException.InnerException;
return new ReturnMessage(exception, methodCall);
}
}
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
var handler = PropertyChanged;
if (handler != null) handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanging(string propertyName)
{
var handler = PropertyChanging;
if (handler != null) handler(this, new PropertyChangingEventArgs(propertyName));
}
public static Type ImplementINotify(Type objectType)
{
var tempAssemblyName = new AssemblyName(Guid.NewGuid().ToString());
var dynamicAssembly = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.DefineDynamicAssembly(
tempAssemblyName, AssemblyBuilderAccess.RunAndCollect);
var moduleBuilder = dynamicAssembly.DefineDynamicModule(
tempAssemblyName.Name,
tempAssemblyName + ".dll");
var typeBuilder = moduleBuilder.DefineType(
objectType.FullName, TypeAttributes.Public | TypeAttributes.Interface | TypeAttributes.Abstract);
typeBuilder.AddInterfaceImplementation(objectType);
typeBuilder.AddInterfaceImplementation(typeof(INotifyPropertyChanged));
typeBuilder.AddInterfaceImplementation(typeof(INotifyPropertyChanging));
var newType = typeBuilder.CreateType();
return newType;
}
}
}
另一个想法……
public class ViewModelBase : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private Dictionary<string, object> _propertyStore = new Dictionary<string, object>();
protected virtual void SetValue<T>(T value, [CallerMemberName] string propertyName="") {
_propertyStore[propertyName] = value;
OnPropertyChanged(propertyName);
}
protected virtual T GetValue<T>([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = "")
{
object ret;
if (_propertyStore.TryGetValue(propertyName, out ret))
{
return (T)ret;
}
else
{
return default(T);
}
}
//Usage
//public string SomeProperty {
// get { return GetValue<string>(); }
// set { SetValue(value); }
//}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
var temp = PropertyChanged;
if (temp != null)
temp.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
我认为人们应该多关注一下表现;当有很多对象需要绑定时(想想有10,000多行的网格),或者对象的值经常变化时(实时监控应用程序),它确实会影响UI。
我把这里和其他地方找到的各种实现进行了比较;查看INotifyPropertyChanged实现的性能比较。
下面是测试结果