我真的很喜欢Marc的解决方案，但我认为可以稍微改进一下，以避免使用“魔法字符串”(不支持重构)。与其将属性名作为字符串使用，不如将其创建为lambda表达式:

private string name;
public string Name
{
    get { return name; }
    set { SetField(ref name, value, () => Name); }
}

只需要在Marc的代码中添加以下方法，就可以了:

protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged<T>(Expression<Func<T>> selectorExpression)
{
    if (selectorExpression == null)
        throw new ArgumentNullException("selectorExpression");
    MemberExpression body = selectorExpression.Body as MemberExpression;
    if (body == null)
        throw new ArgumentException("The body must be a member expression");
    OnPropertyChanged(body.Member.Name);
}

protected bool SetField<T>(ref T field, T value, Expression<Func<T>> selectorExpression)
{
    if (EqualityComparer<T>.Default.Equals(field, value)) return false;
    field = value;
    OnPropertyChanged(selectorExpression);
    return true;
}

顺便说一句，这是受到这篇博客文章的启发。

=>这里我的解决方案具有以下特征

 public ResourceStatus Status
 {
     get { return _status; }
     set
     {
         _status = value;
         Notify(Npcea.Status,Npcea.Comments);
     }
 }

没有refelction 短的符号 业务代码中没有神奇的字符串 PropertyChangedEventArgs在应用程序中的可重用性 在一条语句中通知多个属性的可能性

让我介绍一下我自己的方法，叫做Yappi。 它属于运行时代理|派生类生成器，向现有对象或类型添加新功能，如种姓项目的动态代理。

它允许在基类中实现INotifyPropertyChanged一次，然后以以下风格声明派生类，仍然支持INotifyPropertyChanged用于新属性:

public class Animal:Concept
{
    protected Animal(){}
    public virtual string Name { get; set; }
    public virtual int Age { get; set; }
}

派生类或代理构造的复杂性可以隐藏在下面这行代码后面:

var animal = Concept.Create<Animal>.New();

所有的INotifyPropertyChanged实现工作可以像这样完成:

public class Concept:INotifyPropertyChanged
{
    //Hide constructor
    protected Concept(){}

    public static class Create<TConcept> where TConcept:Concept
    {
        //Construct derived Type calling PropertyProxy.ConstructType
        public static readonly Type Type = PropertyProxy.ConstructType<TConcept, Implementation<TConcept>>(new Type[0], true);
        //Create constructing delegate calling Constructor.Compile
        public static Func<TConcept> New = Constructor.Compile<Func<TConcept>>(Type);
    }


    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;

    protected void OnPropertyChanged(PropertyChangedEventArgs eventArgs)
    {
        var caller = PropertyChanged;
        if(caller!=null)
        {
            caller(this, eventArgs);
        }
    }

    //define implementation
    public class Implementation<TConcept> : DefaultImplementation<TConcept> where TConcept:Concept
    {
        public override Func<TBaseType, TResult> OverrideGetter<TBaseType, TDeclaringType, TConstructedType, TResult>(PropertyInfo property)
        {
            return PropertyImplementation<TBaseType, TDeclaringType>.GetGetter<TResult>(property.Name);
        }
        /// <summary>
        /// Overriding property setter implementation.
        /// </summary>
        /// <typeparam name="TBaseType">Base type for implementation. TBaseType must be TConcept, and inherits all its constraints. Also TBaseType is TDeclaringType.</typeparam>
        /// <typeparam name="TDeclaringType">Type, declaring property.</typeparam>
        /// <typeparam name="TConstructedType">Constructed type. TConstructedType is TDeclaringType and TBaseType.</typeparam>
        /// <typeparam name="TResult">Type of property.</typeparam>
        /// <param name="property">PropertyInfo of property.</param>
        /// <returns>Delegate, corresponding to property setter implementation.</returns>
        public override Action<TBaseType, TResult> OverrideSetter<TBaseType, TDeclaringType, TConstructedType, TResult>(PropertyInfo property)
        {
            //This code called once for each declared property on derived type's initialization.
            //EventArgs instance is shared between all events for each concrete property.
            var eventArgs = new PropertyChangedEventArgs(property.Name);
            //get delegates for base calls.
            Action<TBaseType, TResult> setter = PropertyImplementation<TBaseType, TDeclaringType>.GetSetter<TResult>(property.Name);
            Func<TBaseType, TResult> getter = PropertyImplementation<TBaseType, TDeclaringType>.GetGetter<TResult>(property.Name);

            var comparer = EqualityComparer<TResult>.Default;

            return (pthis, value) =>
            {//This code executes each time property setter is called.
                if (comparer.Equals(value, getter(pthis))) return;
                //base. call
                setter(pthis, value);
                //Directly accessing Concept's protected method.
                pthis.OnPropertyChanged(eventArgs);
            };
        }
    }
}

它对于重构是完全安全的，在类型构造后不使用反射，并且足够快。

使用这个

using System;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Reflection.Emit;
using System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging;
using System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies;


public static class ObservableFactory
{
    public static T Create<T>(T target)
    {
        if (!typeof(T).IsInterface)
            throw new ArgumentException("Target should be an interface", "target");

        var proxy = new Observable<T>(target);
        return (T)proxy.GetTransparentProxy();
    }
}

internal class Observable<T> : RealProxy, INotifyPropertyChanged, INotifyPropertyChanging
{
    private readonly T target;

    internal Observable(T target)
        : base(ImplementINotify(typeof(T)))
    {
        this.target = target;
    }

    public override IMessage Invoke(IMessage msg)
    {
        var methodCall = msg as IMethodCallMessage;

        if (methodCall != null)
        {
            return HandleMethodCall(methodCall);
        }

        return null;
    }

    public event PropertyChangingEventHandler PropertyChanging;
    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;



    IMessage HandleMethodCall(IMethodCallMessage methodCall)
    {
        var isPropertySetterCall = methodCall.MethodName.StartsWith("set_");
        var propertyName = isPropertySetterCall ? methodCall.MethodName.Substring(4) : null;

        if (isPropertySetterCall)
        {
            OnPropertyChanging(propertyName);
        }

        try
        {
            object methodCalltarget = target;

            if (methodCall.MethodName == "add_PropertyChanged" || methodCall.MethodName == "remove_PropertyChanged"||
                methodCall.MethodName == "add_PropertyChanging" || methodCall.MethodName == "remove_PropertyChanging")
            {
                methodCalltarget = this;
            }

            var result = methodCall.MethodBase.Invoke(methodCalltarget, methodCall.InArgs);

            if (isPropertySetterCall)
            {
                OnPropertyChanged(methodCall.MethodName.Substring(4));
            }

            return new ReturnMessage(result, null, 0, methodCall.LogicalCallContext, methodCall);
        }
        catch (TargetInvocationException invocationException)
        {
            var exception = invocationException.InnerException;
            return new ReturnMessage(exception, methodCall);
        }
    }

    protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
    {
        var handler = PropertyChanged;
        if (handler != null) handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
    }

    protected virtual void OnPropertyChanging(string propertyName)
    {
        var handler = PropertyChanging;
        if (handler != null) handler(this, new PropertyChangingEventArgs(propertyName));
    }

    public static Type ImplementINotify(Type objectType)
    {
        var tempAssemblyName = new AssemblyName(Guid.NewGuid().ToString());

        var dynamicAssembly = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.DefineDynamicAssembly(
            tempAssemblyName, AssemblyBuilderAccess.RunAndCollect);

        var moduleBuilder = dynamicAssembly.DefineDynamicModule(
            tempAssemblyName.Name,
            tempAssemblyName + ".dll");

        var typeBuilder = moduleBuilder.DefineType(
            objectType.FullName, TypeAttributes.Public | TypeAttributes.Interface | TypeAttributes.Abstract);

        typeBuilder.AddInterfaceImplementation(objectType);
        typeBuilder.AddInterfaceImplementation(typeof(INotifyPropertyChanged));
        typeBuilder.AddInterfaceImplementation(typeof(INotifyPropertyChanging));
        var newType = typeBuilder.CreateType();
        return newType;
    }
}

}

它是2022。现在有了官方的解决方案。

使用Microsoft MVVM工具包中的MVVM源生成器。

This

[ObservableProperty]
private string? name;

将生成:

private string? name;

public string? Name
{
    get => name;
    set
    {
        if (!EqualityComparer<string?>.Default.Equals(name, value))
        {
            OnNameChanging(value);
            OnPropertyChanging();
            name = value;
            OnNameChanged(value);
            OnPropertyChanged();
        }
    }
}

// Property changing / changed listener
partial void OnNameChanging(string? value);
partial void OnNameChanged(string? value);

protected void OnPropertyChanging([CallerMemberName] string? propertyName = null)
{
    PropertyChanging?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangingEventArgs(propertyName));
}

protected void OnPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string? propertyName = null)
{
    PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}

它支持。net标准2.0和。net >= 5.0。

我意识到这个问题已经有无数个答案了，但没有一个适合我。我的问题是我不想有任何性能上的影响，并愿意忍受一点冗长的原因。我也不太关心自动属性，这让我想到了以下解决方案:

public abstract class AbstractObject : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;

    public void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
    {
        PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
    }

    protected virtual bool SetValue<TKind>(ref TKind Source, TKind NewValue, params string[] Notify)
    {
        //Set value if the new value is different from the old
        if (!Source.Equals(NewValue))
        {
            Source = NewValue;

            //Notify all applicable properties
            foreach (var i in Notify)
                OnPropertyChanged(i);

            return true;
        }

        return false;
    }

    public AbstractObject()
    {
    }
}

换句话说，如果你不介意这样做，上面的解决方案是很方便的:

public class SomeObject : AbstractObject
{
    public string AnotherProperty
    {
        get
        {
            return someProperty ? "Car" : "Plane";
        }
    }

    bool someProperty = false;
    public bool SomeProperty
    {
        get
        {
            return someProperty;
        }
        set
        {
            SetValue(ref someProperty, value, "SomeProperty", "AnotherProperty");
        }
    }

    public SomeObject() : base()
    {
    }
}

Pros

没有反映 只通知旧值!=新值 同时通知多个属性

Cons

没有自动属性(不过，您可以同时添加对两者的支持!) 一些冗长 拳击(小性能命中?)

唉，还是比这样做要好，

set
{
    if (!someProperty.Equals(value))
    {
        someProperty = value;
        OnPropertyChanged("SomeProperty");
        OnPropertyChanged("AnotherProperty");
    }
}

对于每一个单独的属性，这将成为一个额外的冗长的噩梦;-(

注意，我并不是说这个解决方案在性能上比其他解决方案更好，只是说对于那些不喜欢其他解决方案的人来说，它是一个可行的解决方案。