由于这个问题的几乎所有答案都不令人满意，或者在我的情况下显然不起作用，我编写了AnyClone，它完全通过反思实现，并解决了这里的所有需求。我无法让序列化在结构复杂的复杂场景中工作，IClonable也不太理想——事实上，它甚至没有必要。

使用[IgnoreDataMember]、[NonSerialized]支持标准忽略属性。支持复杂集合、不带setter的财产、只读字段等。

我希望这能帮助其他遇到我同样问题的人。

这将把一个对象的所有可读写财产复制到另一个对象。

 public class PropertyCopy<TSource, TTarget> 
                        where TSource: class, new()
                        where TTarget: class, new()
        {
            public static TTarget Copy(TSource src, TTarget trg, params string[] properties)
            {
                if (src==null) return trg;
                if (trg == null) trg = new TTarget();
                var fulllist = src.GetType().GetProperties().Where(c => c.CanWrite && c.CanRead).ToList();
                if (properties != null && properties.Count() > 0)
                    fulllist = fulllist.Where(c => properties.Contains(c.Name)).ToList();
                if (fulllist == null || fulllist.Count() == 0) return trg;

                fulllist.ForEach(c =>
                    {
                        c.SetValue(trg, c.GetValue(src));
                    });

                return trg;
            }
        }

这是你使用它的方式：

 var cloned = Utils.PropertyCopy<TKTicket, TKTicket>.Copy(_tmp, dbsave,
                                                            "Creation",
                                                            "Description",
                                                            "IdTicketStatus",
                                                            "IdUserCreated",
                                                            "IdUserInCharge",
                                                            "IdUserRequested",
                                                            "IsUniqueTicketGenerated",
                                                            "LastEdit",
                                                            "Subject",
                                                            "UniqeTicketRequestId",
                                                            "Visibility");

或复制所有内容：

var cloned = Utils.PropertyCopy<TKTicket, TKTicket>.Copy(_tmp, dbsave);

保持简单，并使用AutoMapper，正如其他人提到的，这是一个简单的小库，可以将一个对象映射到另一个对象。。。要将一个对象复制到另一个具有相同类型的对象，只需要三行代码：

MyType source = new MyType();
Mapper.CreateMap<MyType, MyType>();
MyType target = Mapper.Map<MyType, MyType>(source);

目标对象现在是源对象的副本。不够简单？创建扩展方法以在解决方案中的任何地方使用：

public static T Copy<T>(this T source)
{
    T copy = default(T);
    Mapper.CreateMap<T, T>();
    copy = Mapper.Map<T, T>(source);
    return copy;
}

扩展方法可以如下使用：

MyType copy = source.Copy();

使用IClonable接口可以花费多少精力是令人难以置信的，尤其是当您有大量的类层次结构时。MemberwiseColone的工作方式也很奇怪——它甚至不能完全克隆普通的List类型的结构。

当然，串行化最有趣的困境是串行化反向引用——例如，具有子-父关系的类层次结构。我怀疑二进制序列化程序能否在这种情况下帮助您。（最终将导致递归循环+堆栈溢出）。

不知怎么的，我喜欢这里提出的解决方案：如何在.NET（特别是C#）中对对象进行深度复制？

然而，它不支持Lists，并补充说，该支持还考虑到了重新养育子女的问题。对于我制定的仅为父项的规则，该字段或属性应命名为“parent”，则DeepClone将忽略它。您可能需要决定自己的反向引用规则——对于树层次结构，它可能是“左/右”等。。。

以下是包含测试代码的完整代码片段：

using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Text;

namespace TestDeepClone
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            A a = new A();
            a.name = "main_A";
            a.b_list.Add(new B(a) { name = "b1" });
            a.b_list.Add(new B(a) { name = "b2" });

            A a2 = (A)a.DeepClone();
            a2.name = "second_A";

            // Perform re-parenting manually after deep copy.
            foreach( var b in a2.b_list )
                b.parent = a2;


            Debug.WriteLine("ok");

        }
    }

    public class A
    {
        public String name = "one";
        public List<String> list = new List<string>();
        public List<String> null_list;
        public List<B> b_list = new List<B>();
        private int private_pleaseCopyMeAsWell = 5;

        public override string ToString()
        {
            return "A(" + name + ")";
        }
    }

    public class B
    {
        public B() { }
        public B(A _parent) { parent = _parent; }
        public A parent;
        public String name = "two";
    }


    public static class ReflectionEx
    {
        public static Type GetUnderlyingType(this MemberInfo member)
        {
            Type type;
            switch (member.MemberType)
            {
                case MemberTypes.Field:
                    type = ((FieldInfo)member).FieldType;
                    break;
                case MemberTypes.Property:
                    type = ((PropertyInfo)member).PropertyType;
                    break;
                case MemberTypes.Event:
                    type = ((EventInfo)member).EventHandlerType;
                    break;
                default:
                    throw new ArgumentException("member must be if type FieldInfo, PropertyInfo or EventInfo", "member");
            }
            return Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(type) ?? type;
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Gets fields and properties into one array.
        /// Order of properties / fields will be preserved in order of appearance in class / struct. (MetadataToken is used for sorting such cases)
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="type">Type from which to get</param>
        /// <returns>array of fields and properties</returns>
        public static MemberInfo[] GetFieldsAndProperties(this Type type)
        {
            List<MemberInfo> fps = new List<MemberInfo>();
            fps.AddRange(type.GetFields());
            fps.AddRange(type.GetProperties());
            fps = fps.OrderBy(x => x.MetadataToken).ToList();
            return fps.ToArray();
        }

        public static object GetValue(this MemberInfo member, object target)
        {
            if (member is PropertyInfo)
            {
                return (member as PropertyInfo).GetValue(target, null);
            }
            else if (member is FieldInfo)
            {
                return (member as FieldInfo).GetValue(target);
            }
            else
            {
                throw new Exception("member must be either PropertyInfo or FieldInfo");
            }
        }

        public static void SetValue(this MemberInfo member, object target, object value)
        {
            if (member is PropertyInfo)
            {
                (member as PropertyInfo).SetValue(target, value, null);
            }
            else if (member is FieldInfo)
            {
                (member as FieldInfo).SetValue(target, value);
            }
            else
            {
                throw new Exception("destinationMember must be either PropertyInfo or FieldInfo");
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Deep clones specific object.
        /// Analogue can be found here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/129389/how-do-you-do-a-deep-copy-an-object-in-net-c-specifically
        /// This is now improved version (list support added)
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="obj">object to be cloned</param>
        /// <returns>full copy of object.</returns>
        public static object DeepClone(this object obj)
        {
            if (obj == null)
                return null;

            Type type = obj.GetType();

            if (obj is IList)
            {
                IList list = ((IList)obj);
                IList newlist = (IList)Activator.CreateInstance(obj.GetType(), list.Count);

                foreach (object elem in list)
                    newlist.Add(DeepClone(elem));

                return newlist;
            } //if

            if (type.IsValueType || type == typeof(string))
            {
                return obj;
            }
            else if (type.IsArray)
            {
                Type elementType = Type.GetType(type.FullName.Replace("[]", string.Empty));
                var array = obj as Array;
                Array copied = Array.CreateInstance(elementType, array.Length);

                for (int i = 0; i < array.Length; i++)
                    copied.SetValue(DeepClone(array.GetValue(i)), i);

                return Convert.ChangeType(copied, obj.GetType());
            }
            else if (type.IsClass)
            {
                object toret = Activator.CreateInstance(obj.GetType());

                MemberInfo[] fields = type.GetFieldsAndProperties();
                foreach (MemberInfo field in fields)
                {
                    // Don't clone parent back-reference classes. (Using special kind of naming 'parent' 
                    // to indicate child's parent class.
                    if (field.Name == "parent")
                    {
                        continue;
                    }

                    object fieldValue = field.GetValue(obj);

                    if (fieldValue == null)
                        continue;

                    field.SetValue(toret, DeepClone(fieldValue));
                }

                return toret;
            }
            else
            {
                // Don't know that type, don't know how to clone it.
                if (Debugger.IsAttached)
                    Debugger.Break();

                return null;
            }
        } //DeepClone
    }

}

好的，这篇文章中有一些明显的反射示例，但反射通常很慢，直到你开始正确缓存它。

如果你能正确缓存它，那么它将以4.6s的速度深度克隆1000000个对象（由Watcher测量）。

static readonly Dictionary<Type, PropertyInfo[]> ProperyList = new Dictionary<Type, PropertyInfo[]>();

而不是获取缓存的财产或将新属性添加到字典并简单使用它们

foreach (var prop in propList)
{
        var value = prop.GetValue(source, null);   
        prop.SetValue(copyInstance, value, null);
}

在另一个答案中查看我的帖子中的完整代码

https://stackoverflow.com/a/34365709/4711853

我知道，这个问题和答案在这里停留了一段时间，下面不是很好的答案，而是观察，最近我在检查是否确实没有克隆隐私（如果没有，我就不会是我自己了；）时，我很高兴地复制了粘贴的@johnc更新的答案。

我简单地制作了自己的扩展方法（这几乎是上述答案的复制粘贴）：

public static class CloneThroughJsonExtension
{
    private static readonly JsonSerializerSettings DeserializeSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings { ObjectCreationHandling = ObjectCreationHandling.Replace };

    public static T CloneThroughJson<T>(this T source)
    {
        return ReferenceEquals(source, null) ? default(T) : JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<T>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(source), DeserializeSettings);
    }
}

并天真地放弃了这样的课程（事实上，有更多这样的课程，但它们是无关的）：

public class WhatTheHeck
{
    public string PrivateSet { get; private set; } // matches ctor param name

    public string GetOnly { get; } // matches ctor param name

    private readonly string _indirectField;
    public string Indirect => $"Inception of: {_indirectField} "; // matches ctor param name
    public string RealIndirectFieldVaule => _indirectField;

    public WhatTheHeck(string privateSet, string getOnly, string indirect)
    {
        PrivateSet = privateSet;
        GetOnly = getOnly;
        _indirectField = indirect;
    }
}

代码如下：

var clone = new WhatTheHeck("Private-Set-Prop cloned!", "Get-Only-Prop cloned!", "Indirect-Field clonned!").CloneThroughJson();
Console.WriteLine($"1. {clone.PrivateSet}");
Console.WriteLine($"2. {clone.GetOnly}");
Console.WriteLine($"3.1. {clone.Indirect}");
Console.WriteLine($"3.2. {clone.RealIndirectFieldVaule}");

结果是：

1. Private-Set-Prop cloned!
2. Get-Only-Prop cloned!
3.1. Inception of: Inception of: Indirect-Field cloned!
3.2. Inception of: Indirect-Field cloned!

我整个人都在想：什么……所以我抓起Newtonsoft.Json Github repo，开始挖掘。结果是：当反序列化一个恰好只有一个ctor且其参数名匹配（不区分大小写）公共属性名的类型时，它们将作为这些参数传递给ctor。在这里和这里的代码中可以找到一些线索。

要旨

我知道这不是很常见的情况，示例代码有点滥用，但嘿！当我检查灌木丛中是否有龙在等着跳出来咬我的屁股时，我大吃一惊；）