我想做一些事情,比如:

MyObject myObj = GetMyObj(); // Create and fill a new object
MyObject newObj = myObj.Clone();

然后对未反映在原始对象中的新对象进行更改。

我通常不需要这个功能,所以当有必要时,我会创建一个新对象,然后单独复制每个属性,但这总是让我觉得有更好或更优雅的方法来处理这种情况。

如何克隆或深度复制对象,以便在原始对象中不反映任何更改的情况下修改克隆的对象?


当前回答

虽然一种方法是实现ICloneable接口(在这里描述,所以我不会反悔),但这里有一个很好的深度克隆对象复制器,我不久前在代码项目中找到了它,并将其合并到我们的代码中。如其他地方所述,它要求您的对象是可序列化的。

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Runtime.Serialization;
using System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary;

/// <summary>
/// Reference Article http://www.codeproject.com/KB/tips/SerializedObjectCloner.aspx
/// Provides a method for performing a deep copy of an object.
/// Binary Serialization is used to perform the copy.
/// </summary>
public static class ObjectCopier
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Perform a deep copy of the object via serialization.
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
    /// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
    /// <returns>A deep copy of the object.</returns>
    public static T Clone<T>(T source)
    {
        if (!typeof(T).IsSerializable)
        {
            throw new ArgumentException("The type must be serializable.", nameof(source));
        }

        // Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
        if (ReferenceEquals(source, null)) return default;

        using var Stream stream = new MemoryStream();
        IFormatter formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
        formatter.Serialize(stream, source);
        stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
        return (T)formatter.Deserialize(stream);
    }
}

其思想是它序列化对象,然后将其反序列化为新对象。好处是,当对象变得太复杂时,您不必担心克隆任何东西。

如果您希望使用C#3.0的新扩展方法,请将该方法更改为具有以下签名:

public static T Clone<T>(this T source)
{
   // ...
}

现在,方法调用简单地变成objectBeingCloned.Clone();。

EDIT(2015年1月10日)我想我会重新考虑这个问题,要说我最近开始使用(Newtonsoft)Json来做这个,它应该更轻,并避免[Serializable]标签的开销。(NB@atconway在评论中指出,私有成员不是使用JSON方法克隆的)

/// <summary>
/// Perform a deep Copy of the object, using Json as a serialization method. NOTE: Private members are not cloned using this method.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
/// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
/// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
public static T CloneJson<T>(this T source)
{            
    // Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
    if (ReferenceEquals(source, null)) return default;

    // initialize inner objects individually
    // for example in default constructor some list property initialized with some values,
    // but in 'source' these items are cleaned -
    // without ObjectCreationHandling.Replace default constructor values will be added to result
    var deserializeSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings {ObjectCreationHandling = ObjectCreationHandling.Replace};

    return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<T>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(source), deserializeSettings);
}

其他回答

虽然一种方法是实现ICloneable接口(在这里描述,所以我不会反悔),但这里有一个很好的深度克隆对象复制器,我不久前在代码项目中找到了它,并将其合并到我们的代码中。如其他地方所述,它要求您的对象是可序列化的。

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Runtime.Serialization;
using System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary;

/// <summary>
/// Reference Article http://www.codeproject.com/KB/tips/SerializedObjectCloner.aspx
/// Provides a method for performing a deep copy of an object.
/// Binary Serialization is used to perform the copy.
/// </summary>
public static class ObjectCopier
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Perform a deep copy of the object via serialization.
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
    /// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
    /// <returns>A deep copy of the object.</returns>
    public static T Clone<T>(T source)
    {
        if (!typeof(T).IsSerializable)
        {
            throw new ArgumentException("The type must be serializable.", nameof(source));
        }

        // Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
        if (ReferenceEquals(source, null)) return default;

        using var Stream stream = new MemoryStream();
        IFormatter formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
        formatter.Serialize(stream, source);
        stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
        return (T)formatter.Deserialize(stream);
    }
}

其思想是它序列化对象,然后将其反序列化为新对象。好处是,当对象变得太复杂时,您不必担心克隆任何东西。

如果您希望使用C#3.0的新扩展方法,请将该方法更改为具有以下签名:

public static T Clone<T>(this T source)
{
   // ...
}

现在,方法调用简单地变成objectBeingCloned.Clone();。

EDIT(2015年1月10日)我想我会重新考虑这个问题,要说我最近开始使用(Newtonsoft)Json来做这个,它应该更轻,并避免[Serializable]标签的开销。(NB@atconway在评论中指出,私有成员不是使用JSON方法克隆的)

/// <summary>
/// Perform a deep Copy of the object, using Json as a serialization method. NOTE: Private members are not cloned using this method.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
/// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
/// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
public static T CloneJson<T>(this T source)
{            
    // Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
    if (ReferenceEquals(source, null)) return default;

    // initialize inner objects individually
    // for example in default constructor some list property initialized with some values,
    // but in 'source' these items are cleaned -
    // without ObjectCreationHandling.Replace default constructor values will be added to result
    var deserializeSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings {ObjectCreationHandling = ObjectCreationHandling.Replace};

    return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<T>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(source), deserializeSettings);
}

我对当前的答案做了一些基准测试,发现了一些有趣的事实。

使用BinarySerializer=>https://stackoverflow.com/a/78612/6338072

使用XmlSerializer=>https://stackoverflow.com/a/50150204/6338072

使用Activator.CreateInstance=>https://stackoverflow.com/a/56691124/6338072

这些是结果

BenchmarkDotNet=v0.13.1, OS=Windows 10.0.18363.1734 (1909/November2019Update/19H2)

Intel Core i5-6200U CPU 2.30GHz(Skylake),1个CPU,4个逻辑核和2个物理核[主机]:.NET Framework 4.8(4.8.4400.0),X86 LegacyJIT默认作业:.NET Framework 4.8(4.8.4400.0),X86 LegacyJIT

Method Mean Error StdDev Gen 0 Allocated
BinarySerializer 220.69 us 4.374 us 9.963 us 49.8047 77 KB
XmlSerializer 182.72 us 3.619 us 9.405 us 21.9727 34 KB
Activator.CreateInstance 49.99 us 0.992 us 2.861 us 1.9531 3 KB

找到了这个包,与之相比,DeepCloner似乎更快,而且没有依赖关系。

https://github.com/AlenToma/FastDeepCloner

当使用Marc Gravells protobuf net作为序列化程序时,接受的答案需要一些轻微的修改,因为要复制的对象不会被归因于[Serializable],因此不可序列化,Clone方法将抛出异常。我修改了它以与protobuf net一起使用:

public static T Clone<T>(this T source)
{
    if(Attribute.GetCustomAttribute(typeof(T), typeof(ProtoBuf.ProtoContractAttribute))
           == null)
    {
        throw new ArgumentException("Type has no ProtoContract!", "source");
    }

    if(Object.ReferenceEquals(source, null))
    {
        return default(T);
    }

    IFormatter formatter = ProtoBuf.Serializer.CreateFormatter<T>();
    using (Stream stream = new MemoryStream())
    {
        formatter.Serialize(stream, source);
        stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
        return (T)formatter.Deserialize(stream);
    }
}

这将检查[ProtoControl]属性的存在,并使用protobufs自己的格式化程序来序列化对象。

基于@craastad的答案,对于派生类。

在最初的答案中,如果调用者在基类对象上调用DeepCopy,则克隆的对象属于基类。但下面的代码将返回派生类。

using Newtonsoft.Json;

public static T DeepCopy<T>(this T source)
{
    return (T)JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(source), source.GetType());
}