我们可以先从列表中排除nums[j](其中j != i)，然后得到其余部分的乘积;下面是python解决这个难题的方法:

from functools import reduce
def products(nums):
    return [ reduce(lambda x,y: x * y, nums[:i] + nums[i+1:]) for i in range(len(nums)) ]
print(products([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]))

[out]
[120, 60, 40, 30, 24]

以下是线性O(n)时间内的简单Scala版本:

def getProductEff(in:Seq[Int]):Seq[Int] = {

   //create a list which has product of every element to the left of this element
   val fromLeft = in.foldLeft((1, Seq.empty[Int]))((ac, i) => (i * ac._1, ac._2 :+ ac._1))._2

   //create a list which has product of every element to the right of this element, which is the same as the previous step but in reverse
   val fromRight = in.reverse.foldLeft((1,Seq.empty[Int]))((ac,i) => (i * ac._1,ac._2 :+ ac._1))._2.reverse

   //merge the two list by product at index
   in.indices.map(i => fromLeft(i) * fromRight(i))

}

这是可行的，因为本质上答案是一个数组，它是左右所有元素的乘积。

JavaScript中使用reduce的变体

const getProduct = arr => arr。Reduce ((acc, value) => acc * value); const arrayWithExclusion = (arr, node) => 加勒比海盗。Reduce ((acc, val, j) => (node !== j ?)[…Acc, val]: Acc)， []); const getproductwitheexclusion = arr => { Let result = []; 对于(设I = 0;I < arrr .length;I += 1) { 结果。推动(getProduct (arrayWithExclusion(加勒比海盗,我))); ｝ 返回结果; }；

这里有一个小的递归函数(在c++中)来进行修改。它需要O(n)额外的空间(在堆栈上)。假设数组在a中，N表示数组长度，我们有:

int multiply(int *a, int fwdProduct, int indx) {
    int revProduct = 1;
    if (indx < N) {
       revProduct = multiply(a, fwdProduct*a[indx], indx+1);
       int cur = a[indx];
       a[indx] = fwdProduct * revProduct;
       revProduct *= cur;
    }
    return revProduct;
}

下面是Ruby中的一行程序解决方案。

全国矿工工会。映射{|n| (num - [n]).inject(:*)}

//这是Java中的递归解决方案 //从main product(a,1,0)调用如下;

public static double product(double[] a, double fwdprod, int index){
    double revprod = 1;
    if (index < a.length){
        revprod = product2(a, fwdprod*a[index], index+1);
        double cur = a[index];
        a[index] = fwdprod * revprod;
        revprod *= cur;
    }
    return revprod;
}