int[] b = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };            
int j;
for(int i=0;i<b.Length;i++)
{
  int prod = 1;
  int s = b[i];
  for(j=i;j<b.Length-1;j++)
  {
    prod = prod * b[j + 1];
  }
int pos = i;    
while(pos!=-1)
{
  pos--;
  if(pos!=-1)
     prod = prod * b[pos];                    
}
Console.WriteLine("\n Output is {0}",prod);
}

{-
Recursive solution using sqrt(n) subsets. Runs in O(n).

Recursively computes the solution on sqrt(n) subsets of size sqrt(n). 
Then recurses on the product sum of each subset.
Then for each element in each subset, it computes the product with
the product sum of all other products.
Then flattens all subsets.

Recurrence on the run time is T(n) = sqrt(n)*T(sqrt(n)) + T(sqrt(n)) + n

Suppose that T(n) ≤ cn in O(n).

T(n) = sqrt(n)*T(sqrt(n)) + T(sqrt(n)) + n
    ≤ sqrt(n)*c*sqrt(n) + c*sqrt(n) + n
    ≤ c*n + c*sqrt(n) + n
    ≤ (2c+1)*n
    ∈ O(n)

Note that ceiling(sqrt(n)) can be computed using a binary search 
and O(logn) iterations, if the sqrt instruction is not permitted.
-}

otherProducts [] = []
otherProducts [x] = [1]
otherProducts [x,y] = [y,x]
otherProducts a = foldl' (++) [] $ zipWith (\s p -> map (*p) s) solvedSubsets subsetOtherProducts
    where 
      n = length a

      -- Subset size. Require that 1 < s < n.
      s = ceiling $ sqrt $ fromIntegral n

      solvedSubsets = map otherProducts subsets
      subsetOtherProducts = otherProducts $ map product subsets

      subsets = reverse $ loop a []
          where loop [] acc = acc
                loop a acc = loop (drop s a) ((take s a):acc)

鬼鬼祟祟地绕过“不划分”规则:

sum = 0.0
for i in range(a):
  sum += log(a[i])

for i in range(a):
  output[i] = exp(sum - log(a[i]))

还有一个O(N^(3/2))非最优解。不过，这很有趣。

首先预处理大小为N^0.5的每个部分乘法(这在O(N)时间复杂度中完成)。然后，计算每个数字的其他值的倍数可以在2*O(N^0.5)时间内完成(为什么?因为您只需要将其他((N^0.5) - 1)数字的最后一个元素相乘，并将结果与属于当前数字组的((N^0.5) - 1)数字相乘。对每一个数都这样做，可以得到O(N^(3/2))时间。

例子:

4, 6, 7, 2, 3, 1, 9, 5, 8

部分结果: 4*6*7 = 168 2*3*1 = 6 9*5*8 = 360

要计算3的值，需要将其他组的值乘以168*360，然后乘以2*1。

根据Billz的回答——抱歉我不能评论，但这里是一个正确处理列表中重复项的scala版本，可能是O(n):

val list1 = List(1, 7, 3, 3, 4, 4)
val view = list1.view.zipWithIndex map { x => list1.view.patch(x._2, Nil, 1).reduceLeft(_*_)}
view.force

返回:

List(1008, 144, 336, 336, 252, 252)

下面是一个使用c#的函数式示例:

            Func<long>[] backwards = new Func<long>[input.Length];
            Func<long>[] forwards = new Func<long>[input.Length];

            for (int i = 0; i < input.Length; ++i)
            {
                var localIndex = i;
                backwards[i] = () => (localIndex > 0 ? backwards[localIndex - 1]() : 1) * input[localIndex];
                forwards[i] = () => (localIndex < input.Length - 1 ? forwards[localIndex + 1]() : 1) * input[localIndex];
            }

            var output = new long[input.Length];
            for (int i = 0; i < input.Length; ++i)
            {
                if (0 == i)
                {
                    output[i] = forwards[i + 1]();
                }
                else if (input.Length - 1 == i)
                {
                    output[i] = backwards[i - 1]();
                }
                else
                {
                    output[i] = forwards[i + 1]() * backwards[i - 1]();
                }
            }

我不完全确定这是O(n)，因为所创建的Funcs是半递归的，但我的测试似乎表明它在时间上是O(n)。