这篇文章清楚地定义了 var, let 和 const 的区别。

const 是一个信号,识别器不会被重新分配. 让我们,这是一个信号,变量可以被重新分配, 例如,一个字符在一个旋转, 或一个值交换在一个算法. 它也信号,变量将只在区块它是定义的, 这并不总是整个内容函数. var 现在是最弱的信号可用,当你定义一个变量在 JavaScript。

https://medium.com/javascript-scene/javascript-es6-var-let-or-const-ba58b8dcde75#.esmkpbg9b

以下两个功能可以显示差异:

function varTest() {
    var x = 31;
    if (true) {
        var x = 71;  // Same variable!
        console.log(x);  // 71
    }
    console.log(x);  // 71
}

function letTest() {
    let x = 31;
    if (true) {
        let x = 71;  // Different variable
        console.log(x);  // 71
    }
    console.log(x);  // 31
}

现在我认为有更好的转换变量到一个区块的声明使用允许:

function printnums()
{
    // i is not accessible here
    for(let i = 0; i <10; i+=)
    {
       console.log(i);
    }
    // i is not accessible here

    // j is accessible here
    for(var j = 0; j <10; j++)
    {
       console.log(j);
    }
    // j is accessible here
}

我认为人们会开始使用Let Here之后,以便他们在JavaScript中与其他语言、Java、C#等类似的分解。

没有对JavaScript的漏洞的明确理解的人早就犯了错误。

Hoisting 不支持使用Let。

在此方法中,在JavaScript中存在的错误正在被删除。

提到ES6在深度:让它更好地理解。

如上所述:

差异是分解. var 被分解到最接近的函数区块,然后被分解到最接近的封锁区块,这可能比函数区块小。

例子1:

在我的两个例子中,我有一个功能 myfunc. myfunc 包含一个变量 myvar 等于 10. 在我的第一个例子中,我检查 myvar 等于 10 (myvar==10). 如果是的话,我 agian 宣布一个变量 myvar (现在我有两个 myvar 变量) 使用 var 关键词并将其分配到一个新的值(20)。

此分類上一篇

例2:在我的第二個例子中,而不是在我的條件區域中使用 var 關鍵字,我宣告 myvar 使用 let 關鍵字. 現在,當我呼叫 myfunc 我得到兩個不同的出口: myvar = 20 和 myvar = 10.

因此,差异很简单,即它的范围。

在 MDN 中查看此链接

let x = 1;

if (x === 1) {
let x = 2;

console.log(x);
// expected output: 2
}

console.log(x);
// expected output: 1

使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here

function loop(arr) {
    // i IS known here, but undefined
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS NOT known here
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS known here, and has a value
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here
}

loop([1,2,3,4]);

for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS NOT known here
};

for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS known here, and has a value
};

loop([1,2,3,4]);

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here

今天使用安全吗?

有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。

事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:

此分類上一篇

如何跟踪浏览器支持