ECMAScript 6 引入了许可声明。
我听说它被描述为一个当地变量,但我仍然不确定它是如何行为不同于 var 关键词。
什么是差异?什么时候应该被允许使用而不是 var?
ECMAScript 6 引入了许可声明。
我听说它被描述为一个当地变量,但我仍然不确定它是如何行为不同于 var 关键词。
什么是差异?什么时候应该被允许使用而不是 var?
当前回答
此分類上一篇: <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <p> 點擊每個數字將登錄到主機:</p> <div id="div1">1</div> <div id="div2">2</div> <div id="div3">3</div> <div id="div4">4</div> <div id="div5">5</div>
每个单点处理器都会提到相同的对象,因为只有一个对象对象持有6个,所以你每次点击获得6个。
一个通用工作是将此插入一个匿名功能,并将它作为一个论点。 这种问题现在也可以通过使用,而不是在下面的代码中显示的变化来避免。
其他回答
我想将这些关键词链接到执行背景,因为执行背景在这一切中都很重要。执行背景有两个阶段:创作阶段和执行阶段。
在创建阶段的执行背景, var, let 和 const 将仍然存储其变量在记忆中与未确定的值在该执行背景的变量环境中. 差异在执行阶段. 如果您使用参考一个变量定义为 var 之前它被分配一个值,它将只是不确定的。
function a(){
b;
let b;
}
a();
> Uncaught ReferenceError: b is not defined
让它很有趣,因为它允许我们做这样的事情:
(() => {
var count = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
console.log(count++);
}
}
}
})();
其次,有数以数以数。
在哪里
(() => {
var count = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
console.log(count++);
}
}
}
})();
只有数数(0,1 )。
这篇文章清楚地定义了 var, let 和 const 的区别。
const 是一个信号,识别器不会被重新分配. 让我们,这是一个信号,变量可以被重新分配, 例如,一个字符在一个旋转, 或一个值交换在一个算法. 它也信号,变量将只在区块它是定义的, 这并不总是整个内容函数. var 现在是最弱的信号可用,当你定义一个变量在 JavaScript。
https://medium.com/javascript-scene/javascript-es6-var-let-or-const-ba58b8dcde75#.esmkpbg9b
使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here
function loop(arr) {
// i IS known here, but undefined
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
};
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS known here, and has a value
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
};
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
}
loop([1,2,3,4]);
for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here
};
for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS known here, and has a value
};
loop([1,2,3,4]);
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here
今天使用安全吗?
有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。
事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:
此分類上一篇
如何跟踪浏览器支持
我刚刚遇到了一个使用案例,我不得不使用Var over让介绍新的变量。
我想创建一个新的变量,具有动态变量名称。
let variableName = 'a';
eval("let " + variableName + '= 10;');
console.log(a); // this doesn't work
var variableName = 'a';
eval("var " + variableName + '= 10;');
console.log(a); // this works
上面的代码不起作用,因为 eval 引入一个新的代码区块. 使用 var 的声明将声明这个代码区块之外的变量,因为 var 声明函数范围内的变量。
另一方面,让我们在区块范围内宣布一个变量,因此,一个变量仅在 eval 区块中可见。