ECMAScript 6 引入了许可声明。
我听说它被描述为一个当地变量,但我仍然不确定它是如何行为不同于 var 关键词。
什么是差异?什么时候应该被允许使用而不是 var?
ECMAScript 6 引入了许可声明。
我听说它被描述为一个当地变量,但我仍然不确定它是如何行为不同于 var 关键词。
什么是差异?什么时候应该被允许使用而不是 var?
当前回答
我刚刚遇到了一个使用案例,我不得不使用Var over让介绍新的变量。
我想创建一个新的变量,具有动态变量名称。
let variableName = 'a';
eval("let " + variableName + '= 10;');
console.log(a); // this doesn't work
var variableName = 'a';
eval("var " + variableName + '= 10;');
console.log(a); // this works
上面的代码不起作用,因为 eval 引入一个新的代码区块. 使用 var 的声明将声明这个代码区块之外的变量,因为 var 声明函数范围内的变量。
另一方面,让我们在区块范围内宣布一个变量,因此,一个变量仅在 eval 区块中可见。
其他回答
正如我目前正在试图深入了解JavaScript,我将分享我的简短研究,其中包含一些已经讨论的伟大作品,以及一些其他细节,从不同的角度。
理解VAR和LAT之间的差异可以更容易,如果我们理解函数和区块范围之间的差异。
让我们来看看以下案例:
(function timer() {
for(var i = 0; i <= 5; i++) {
setTimeout(function notime() { console.log(i); }, i * 1000);
}
})();
Stack VariableEnvironment //one VariablEnvironment for timer();
// when the timer is out - the value will be the same for each iteration
5. [setTimeout, i] [i=5]
4. [setTimeout, i]
3. [setTimeout, i]
2. [setTimeout, i]
1. [setTimeout, i]
0. [setTimeout, i]
####################
(function timer() {
for (let i = 0; i <= 5; i++) {
setTimeout(function notime() { console.log(i); }, i * 1000);
}
})();
Stack LexicalEnvironment - each iteration has a new lexical environment
5. [setTimeout, i] [i=5]
LexicalEnvironment
4. [setTimeout, i] [i=4]
LexicalEnvironment
3. [setTimeout, i] [i=3]
LexicalEnvironment
2. [setTimeout, i] [i=2]
LexicalEnvironment
1. [setTimeout, i] [i=1]
LexicalEnvironment
0. [setTimeout, i] [i=0]
当按时()被称为执行内容时,将创建一个内容,该内容将包含每个字符串的变量环境和所有相应的语法环境。
更简单的例子
功能范围
function test() {
for(var z = 0; z < 69; z++) {
//todo
}
//z is visible outside the loop
}
区块范围
function test() {
for(let z = 0; z < 69; z++) {
//todo
}
//z is not defined :(
}
简而言之,Let和Var之间的区别在于Var是功能分解,Let是区块分解。
我刚刚遇到了一个使用案例,我不得不使用Var over让介绍新的变量。
我想创建一个新的变量,具有动态变量名称。
let variableName = 'a';
eval("let " + variableName + '= 10;');
console.log(a); // this doesn't work
var variableName = 'a';
eval("var " + variableName + '= 10;');
console.log(a); // this works
上面的代码不起作用,因为 eval 引入一个新的代码区块. 使用 var 的声明将声明这个代码区块之外的变量,因为 var 声明函数范围内的变量。
另一方面,让我们在区块范围内宣布一个变量,因此,一个变量仅在 eval 区块中可见。
让它很有趣,因为它允许我们做这样的事情:
(() => {
var count = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
console.log(count++);
}
}
}
})();
其次,有数以数以数。
在哪里
(() => {
var count = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
console.log(count++);
}
}
}
})();
只有数数(0,1 )。
使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here
function loop(arr) {
// i IS known here, but undefined
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
};
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS known here, and has a value
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
};
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
}
loop([1,2,3,4]);
for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here
};
for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS known here, and has a value
};
loop([1,2,3,4]);
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here
今天使用安全吗?
有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。
事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:
此分類上一篇
如何跟踪浏览器支持
现在我认为有更好的转换变量到一个区块的声明使用允许:
function printnums()
{
// i is not accessible here
for(let i = 0; i <10; i+=)
{
console.log(i);
}
// i is not accessible here
// j is accessible here
for(var j = 0; j <10; j++)
{
console.log(j);
}
// j is accessible here
}
我认为人们会开始使用Let Here之后,以便他们在JavaScript中与其他语言、Java、C#等类似的分解。
没有对JavaScript的漏洞的明确理解的人早就犯了错误。
Hoisting 不支持使用Let。
在此方法中,在JavaScript中存在的错误正在被删除。
提到ES6在深度:让它更好地理解。