ECMAScript 6 引入了许可声明。

我听说它被描述为一个当地变量,但我仍然不确定它是如何行为不同于 var 关键词。

什么是差异?什么时候应该被允许使用而不是 var?


当前回答

我刚刚遇到了一个使用案例,我不得不使用Var over让介绍新的变量。

我想创建一个新的变量,具有动态变量名称。

let variableName = 'a';
eval("let " + variableName + '= 10;');
console.log(a);   // this doesn't work
var variableName = 'a';
eval("var " + variableName + '= 10;');
console.log(a);   // this works

上面的代码不起作用,因为 eval 引入一个新的代码区块. 使用 var 的声明将声明这个代码区块之外的变量,因为 var 声明函数范围内的变量。

另一方面,让我们在区块范围内宣布一个变量,因此,一个变量仅在 eval 区块中可见。

其他回答

一些黑客与Let:

1。

    let statistics = [16, 170, 10];
    let [age, height, grade] = statistics;

    console.log(height)

二。

    let x = 120,
    y = 12;
    [x, y] = [y, x];
    console.log(`x: ${x} y: ${y}`);

3、

    let node = {
                   type: "Identifier",
                   name: "foo"
               };

    let { type, name, value } = node;

    console.log(type);      // "Identifier"
    console.log(name);      // "foo"
    console.log(value);     // undefined

    let node = {
        type: "Identifier"
    };

    let { type: localType, name: localName = "bar" } = node;

    console.log(localType);     // "Identifier"
    console.log(localName);     // "bar"

Getter 和 Setter 與 Let:

let jar = {
    numberOfCookies: 10,
    get cookies() {
        return this.numberOfCookies;
    },
    set cookies(value) {
        this.numberOfCookies = value;
    }
};

console.log(jar.cookies)
jar.cookies = 7;

console.log(jar.cookies)

下面是让关键词的解释,有几个例子。

主要区别在于,一个变量的范围是整个关闭功能。

此图在维基百科上显示哪些浏览器支持JavaScript 1.7.

请注意,只有 Mozilla 和 Chrome 浏览器支持它. IE、Safari 和其他可能不支持它。

使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here

function loop(arr) {
    // i IS known here, but undefined
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS NOT known here
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS known here, and has a value
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here
}

loop([1,2,3,4]);

for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS NOT known here
};

for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS known here, and has a value
};

loop([1,2,3,4]);

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here


今天使用安全吗?

有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。

事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:

此分類上一篇


如何跟踪浏览器支持


答答答答答答答答答答答答答答答答答

var 变量是全球性的,基本上可以到达到任何地方,而让变量不是全球性的,只有直到一个关闭的偏见杀死它们。

请参见下面的我的例子,并注意狮子(Let)变量如何在两个 console.logs 中以不同的方式行事;它在第二个 console.log 中变得无效。

var cat = "cat";
let dog = "dog";

var animals = () => {
    var giraffe = "giraffe";
    let lion = "lion";

    console.log(cat);  //will print 'cat'.
    console.log(dog);  //will print 'dog', because dog was declared outside this function (like var cat).

    console.log(giraffe); //will print 'giraffe'.
    console.log(lion); //will print 'lion', as lion is within scope.
}

console.log(giraffe); //will print 'giraffe', as giraffe is a global variable (var).
console.log(lion); //will print UNDEFINED, as lion is a 'let' variable and is now out of scope.

现在我认为有更好的转换变量到一个区块的声明使用允许:

function printnums()
{
    // i is not accessible here
    for(let i = 0; i <10; i+=)
    {
       console.log(i);
    }
    // i is not accessible here

    // j is accessible here
    for(var j = 0; j <10; j++)
    {
       console.log(j);
    }
    // j is accessible here
}

我认为人们会开始使用Let Here之后,以便他们在JavaScript中与其他语言、Java、C#等类似的分解。

没有对JavaScript的漏洞的明确理解的人早就犯了错误。

Hoisting 不支持使用Let。

在此方法中,在JavaScript中存在的错误正在被删除。

提到ES6在深度:让它更好地理解。