ECMAScript 6 引入了许可声明。

我听说它被描述为一个当地变量,但我仍然不确定它是如何行为不同于 var 关键词。

什么是差异?什么时候应该被允许使用而不是 var?


当前回答

下面是让关键词的解释,有几个例子。

主要区别在于,一个变量的范围是整个关闭功能。

此图在维基百科上显示哪些浏览器支持JavaScript 1.7.

请注意,只有 Mozilla 和 Chrome 浏览器支持它. IE、Safari 和其他可能不支持它。

其他回答

让它很有趣,因为它允许我们做这样的事情:

(() => {
    var count = 0;

    for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
        for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
            for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
                console.log(count++);
            }
        }
    }
})();

其次,有数以数以数。

在哪里

(() => {
    var count = 0;

    for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
        for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
            for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
                console.log(count++);
            }
        }
    }
})();

只有数数(0,1 )。

在 MDN 中查看此链接

let x = 1;

if (x === 1) {
let x = 2;

console.log(x);
// expected output: 2
}

console.log(x);
// expected output: 1

下面表明“让我们”和“存在”在范围内是如何不同的:

let gfoo = 123;
if (true) {
    let gfoo = 456;
}
console.log(gfoo); // 123

var hfoo = 123;
if (true) {
    var hfoo = 456;
}
console.log(hfoo); // 456

gfoo,定义为 let 最初是在全球范围内,当我们宣布 gfoo 再次在如果条款的范围改变,当一个新的值被分配到变量在该范围内,它不会影响全球范围。

虽然 hfoo,由 var 定义,起初在全球范围内,但再次当我们在 if 条款内宣布它时,它考虑到全球范围 hfoo,尽管 var 已再次被用来宣布它。

如上所述:

差异是分解. var 被分解到最接近的函数区块,然后被分解到最接近的封锁区块,这可能比函数区块小。

例子1:

在我的两个例子中,我有一个功能 myfunc. myfunc 包含一个变量 myvar 等于 10. 在我的第一个例子中,我检查 myvar 等于 10 (myvar==10). 如果是的话,我 agian 宣布一个变量 myvar (现在我有两个 myvar 变量) 使用 var 关键词并将其分配到一个新的值(20)。

此分類上一篇

例2:在我的第二個例子中,而不是在我的條件區域中使用 var 關鍵字,我宣告 myvar 使用 let 關鍵字. 現在,當我呼叫 myfunc 我得到兩個不同的出口: myvar = 20 和 myvar = 10.

因此,差异很简单,即它的范围。

使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here

function loop(arr) {
    // i IS known here, but undefined
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS NOT known here
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS known here, and has a value
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here
}

loop([1,2,3,4]);

for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS NOT known here
};

for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS known here, and has a value
};

loop([1,2,3,4]);

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here


今天使用安全吗?

有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。

事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:

此分類上一篇


如何跟踪浏览器支持