ECMAScript 6 引入了许可声明。
我听说它被描述为一个当地变量,但我仍然不确定它是如何行为不同于 var 关键词。
什么是差异?什么时候应该被允许使用而不是 var?
ECMAScript 6 引入了许可声明。
我听说它被描述为一个当地变量,但我仍然不确定它是如何行为不同于 var 关键词。
什么是差异?什么时候应该被允许使用而不是 var?
当前回答
下面是让关键词的解释,有几个例子。
主要区别在于,一个变量的范围是整个关闭功能。
此图在维基百科上显示哪些浏览器支持JavaScript 1.7.
请注意,只有 Mozilla 和 Chrome 浏览器支持它. IE、Safari 和其他可能不支持它。
其他回答
如果我正确地阅读规格,那么幸运的是,也可以被利用,以避免自我呼吁的功能,用于模拟私人成员 - 一个流行的设计模式,减少代码的可读性,复杂的漏洞,没有添加真正的代码保护或其他好处 - 除了可能满足某人的欲望,以便停止使用它。
var SomeConstructor;
{
let privateScope = {};
SomeConstructor = function SomeConstructor () {
this.someProperty = "foo";
privateScope.hiddenProperty = "bar";
}
SomeConstructor.prototype.showPublic = function () {
console.log(this.someProperty); // foo
}
SomeConstructor.prototype.showPrivate = function () {
console.log(privateScope.hiddenProperty); // bar
}
}
var myInstance = new SomeConstructor();
myInstance.showPublic();
myInstance.showPrivate();
console.log(privateScope.hiddenProperty); // error
查看“私人界面模拟”
一些黑客与Let:
1。
let statistics = [16, 170, 10];
let [age, height, grade] = statistics;
console.log(height)
二。
let x = 120,
y = 12;
[x, y] = [y, x];
console.log(`x: ${x} y: ${y}`);
3、
let node = {
type: "Identifier",
name: "foo"
};
let { type, name, value } = node;
console.log(type); // "Identifier"
console.log(name); // "foo"
console.log(value); // undefined
let node = {
type: "Identifier"
};
let { type: localType, name: localName = "bar" } = node;
console.log(localType); // "Identifier"
console.log(localName); // "bar"
Getter 和 Setter 與 Let:
let jar = {
numberOfCookies: 10,
get cookies() {
return this.numberOfCookies;
},
set cookies(value) {
this.numberOfCookies = value;
}
};
console.log(jar.cookies)
jar.cookies = 7;
console.log(jar.cookies)
使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here
function loop(arr) {
// i IS known here, but undefined
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
};
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS known here, and has a value
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
};
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
}
loop([1,2,3,4]);
for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here
};
for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS known here, and has a value
};
loop([1,2,3,4]);
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here
今天使用安全吗?
有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。
事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:
此分類上一篇
如何跟踪浏览器支持
在2015年之前,使用 var 关键字是宣布 JavaScript 变量的唯一方式。
在 ES6 (JavaScript 版本) 之后,它允许 2 个新的关键字 let & const。
let = 可以重新分配 const = 不能重新分配 const ( const 源于常态,短形的“const” )
例子:
假设,宣布一个国家名称 / 你的母亲名称, const 是最合适的这里. 因为有更少的机会改变一个国家名称或你的母亲名称很快或晚些时候. 你的年龄,体重,工资,自行车的速度和更多类似于这些类型的数据,经常改变或需要重新分配。
答案缺少一点:
{
let a = 123;
};
console.log(a); // ReferenceError: a is not defined