使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here

function loop(arr) {
    // i IS known here, but undefined
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS NOT known here
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS known here, and has a value
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here
}

loop([1,2,3,4]);

for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS NOT known here
};

for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS known here, and has a value
};

loop([1,2,3,4]);

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here

今天使用安全吗?

有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。

事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:

此分類上一篇

如何跟踪浏览器支持

// An array of adder functions.
var adderFunctions = [];

for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
  // We want the function at index i to add the index to its argument.
  adderFunctions[i] = function(x) {
    // What is i bound to here?
    return x + i;
  };
}

var add12 = adderFunctions[12];

// Uh oh. The function is bound to i in the outer scope, which is currently 1000.
console.log(add12(8) === 20); // => false
console.log(add12(8) === 1008); // => true
console.log(i); // => 1000

// It gets worse.
i = -8;
console.log(add12(8) === 0); // => true

上面的过程不会产生所需的函数序列,因为我的范围超越了每个函数创建的区块的 iteration。 相反,在环节结束时,每个函数的 i 关闭指在环节结束时的 i 值(1000)为每个在 adder 中的匿名函数。

// Let's try this again.
// NOTE: We're using another ES6 keyword, const, for values that won't
// be reassigned. const and let have similar scoping behavior.
const adderFunctions = [];

for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
  // NOTE: We're using the newer arrow function syntax this time, but 
  // using the "function(x) { ..." syntax from the previous example 
  // here would not change the behavior shown.
  adderFunctions[i] = x => x + i;
}

const add12 = adderFunctions[12];

// Yay! The behavior is as expected. 
console.log(add12(8) === 20); // => true

// i's scope doesn't extend outside the for loop.
console.log(i); // => ReferenceError: i is not defined

每个函数现在保留在函数创建时的 i 的值,并且 adderFunctions 按照预期行事。

现在,图像将两种行为混合在一起,你可能会看到为什么不建议在同一脚本中混合更新的Let和 const。

const doubleAdderFunctions = [];

for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
    const j = i;
    doubleAdderFunctions[i] = x => x + i + j;
}

const add18 = doubleAdderFunctions[9];
const add24 = doubleAdderFunctions[12];

// It's not fun debugging situations like this, especially when the
// code is more complex than in this example.
console.log(add18(24) === 42); // => false
console.log(add24(18) === 42); // => false
console.log(add18(24) === add24(18)); // => false
console.log(add18(24) === 2018); // => false
console.log(add24(18) === 2018); // => false
console.log(add18(24) === 1033); // => true
console.log(add24(18) === 1030); // => true

不要让这件事发生在你身上,使用灯具。

正如我目前正在试图深入了解JavaScript,我将分享我的简短研究,其中包含一些已经讨论的伟大作品,以及一些其他细节,从不同的角度。

理解VAR和LAT之间的差异可以更容易,如果我们理解函数和区块范围之间的差异。

让我们来看看以下案例:

(function timer() {
    for(var i = 0; i <= 5; i++) {
        setTimeout(function notime() { console.log(i); }, i * 1000);
    }
})();


   Stack            VariableEnvironment //one VariablEnvironment for timer();
                                       // when the timer is out - the value will be the same for each iteration
5. [setTimeout, i]  [i=5] 
4. [setTimeout, i]  
3. [setTimeout, i]
2. [setTimeout, i]
1. [setTimeout, i]
0. [setTimeout, i]

####################    

(function timer() {
    for (let i = 0; i <= 5; i++) {
        setTimeout(function notime() { console.log(i); }, i * 1000);
    }
})();

   Stack           LexicalEnvironment - each iteration has a new lexical environment
5. [setTimeout, i]  [i=5]       
                      LexicalEnvironment 
4. [setTimeout, i]    [i=4]     
                        LexicalEnvironment 
3. [setTimeout, i]      [i=3]       
                         LexicalEnvironment 
2. [setTimeout, i]       [i=2]
                           LexicalEnvironment 
1. [setTimeout, i]         [i=1]
                             LexicalEnvironment 
0. [setTimeout, i]           [i=0]

当按时()被称为执行内容时,将创建一个内容,该内容将包含每个字符串的变量环境和所有相应的语法环境。

更简单的例子

功能范围

function test() {
    for(var z = 0; z < 69; z++) {
        //todo
    }
    //z is visible outside the loop
}

区块范围

function test() {
    for(let z = 0; z < 69; z++) {
        //todo
    }
    //z is not defined :(
}

简而言之,Let和Var之间的区别在于Var是功能分解,Let是区块分解。

如上所述:

差异是分解. var 被分解到最接近的函数区块,然后被分解到最接近的封锁区块,这可能比函数区块小。

例子1:

在我的两个例子中,我有一个功能 myfunc. myfunc 包含一个变量 myvar 等于 10. 在我的第一个例子中,我检查 myvar 等于 10 (myvar==10). 如果是的话,我 agian 宣布一个变量 myvar (现在我有两个 myvar 变量) 使用 var 关键词并将其分配到一个新的值(20)。

此分類上一篇

例2:在我的第二個例子中,而不是在我的條件區域中使用 var 關鍵字,我宣告 myvar 使用 let 關鍵字. 現在,當我呼叫 myfunc 我得到兩個不同的出口: myvar = 20 和 myvar = 10.

因此,差异很简单,即它的范围。

显然,至少在Visual Studio 2015中,TypeScript 1.5,“var”允许一个区块中的相同变量名称的多个声明,而“Let”不。

这不会导致编译错误:

var x = 1;
var x = 2;

这将是:

let x = 1;
let x = 2;

msg = “Hello World” 函数 doWork() { // msg 将是可用的,因为它被定义在这个开幕式上! 让朋友 = 0; console.log(msg); // 与 VAR 虽然: for (var iCount2 = 0; iCount2 < 5; iCount2++) {} // iCount2 将在这个开幕式后可用! console.log(iCount2); for (let iCount1 = 0; iCount1 < 5; iCount1++) {} // iCount1 将没有