ECMAScript 6 引入了许可声明。
我听说它被描述为一个当地变量,但我仍然不确定它是如何行为不同于 var 关键词。
什么是差异?什么时候应该被允许使用而不是 var?
ECMAScript 6 引入了许可声明。
我听说它被描述为一个当地变量,但我仍然不确定它是如何行为不同于 var 关键词。
什么是差异?什么时候应该被允许使用而不是 var?
当前回答
以下两个功能可以显示差异:
function varTest() {
var x = 31;
if (true) {
var x = 71; // Same variable!
console.log(x); // 71
}
console.log(x); // 71
}
function letTest() {
let x = 31;
if (true) {
let x = 71; // Different variable
console.log(x); // 71
}
console.log(x); // 31
}
其他回答
下面是两者之间的区别的例子:
正如你可以看到的那样, var j 变量仍然在 loop 范围之外有一个值(区块范围),但 let i 变量在 loop 范围之外是不确定的。
“使用严格”; console.log(“var:”); for (var j = 0; j < 2; j++) { console.log(j); } console.log(j); console.log(“let:”); for (let i = 0; i < 2; i++) { console.log(i); } console.log(i);
var 是全球范围(可容量)的变量。
Let and const 是区块范围。
测试JS
{ let l = 'let'; const c = 'const'; var v = 'var'; v2 = 'var 2'; } console.log(v, this.v); console.log(v2, this.v2); console.log(l); // ReferenceError: l 未定义 console.log(c); // ReferenceError: c 未定义
使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here
function loop(arr) {
// i IS known here, but undefined
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
};
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS known here, and has a value
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
};
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
}
loop([1,2,3,4]);
for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here
};
for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS known here, and has a value
};
loop([1,2,3,4]);
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here
今天使用安全吗?
有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。
事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:
此分類上一篇
如何跟踪浏览器支持
让它很有趣,因为它允许我们做这样的事情:
(() => {
var count = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
console.log(count++);
}
}
}
})();
其次,有数以数以数。
在哪里
(() => {
var count = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
console.log(count++);
}
}
}
})();
只有数数(0,1 )。
答案缺少一点:
{
let a = 123;
};
console.log(a); // ReferenceError: a is not defined