相反, var 可以像下面那样粘贴。 { console.log(cc); // undefined. 由于粘贴 var cc = 23; } { console.log(bb); // ReferenceError: bb 没有定义 let bb = 23; } 事实上, Per @Bergi, 两者都是粘贴。

函数运行() { var foo = “Foo”; let bar = “Bar”; console.log(foo, bar); // Foo Bar { var Moo = “Mooo” let baz = “Bazz”; console.log(moo, baz); // Mooo Bazz } console.log(moo); // Mooo console.log(baz); // ReferenceError } run();

為什麼讓關鍵字被引入到語言是功能範圍是混亂的原因,是JavaScript的主要錯誤來源之一。

创建全球对象财产

在最高层次上,让我们不同于VAR,不会在全球对象上创造任何财产:

var foo = “Foo”; // 全球推翻的Let bar = “Bar”; // 不允许全球推翻的console.log(window.foo); // Foo console.log(window.bar); // undefined

显然,至少在Visual Studio 2015中,TypeScript 1.5,“var”允许一个区块中的相同变量名称的多个声明,而“Let”不。

这不会导致编译错误:

var x = 1;
var x = 2;

这将是:

let x = 1;
let x = 2;

ECMAScript 6 添加了另一个关键字来宣布变量,而不是“放下”。

“Let”和“Let”在“var”上引入的主要目标是,而不是传统的词汇,区块点点点点点点点点点点点点点点点点点点点点点点点点。

差异在于与每一个声明的变量范围。

让变量仅在其最接近的封锁区({... })中可见。让变量仅在变量被宣布后发生的代码线上可用。让变量不被随后的变量或变量重新宣布。让变量不被全球变量添加到全球窗口对象中。让变量易于使用与封锁(它们不会导致赛车条件)。

{
    let x = 1;
}
console.log(`x is ${x}`);  // ReferenceError during parsing: "x is not defined".

{
    x = x + 1;  // ReferenceError during parsing: "x is not defined".
    let x;
    console.log(`x is ${x}`);  // Never runs.
}

没有重新宣言:下列代码表明,被允许宣言的变量不能随后重新宣言:

let x = 1;
let x = 2;  // SyntaxError: Identifier 'x' has already been declared

var button = "I cause accidents because my name is too common.";
let link = "Though my name is common, I am harder to access from other JS files.";
console.log(link);  // OK
console.log(window.link);  // undefined (GOOD!)
console.log(window.button);  // OK

5. 易于使用与关闭: 与 var 表示的变量与关闭内部的关闭工作不太好. 这里是一个简单的旋转,结果的值序列,变量 i 有在不同的时间点:

for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
    console.log(`i is ${i}`), 125/*ms*/);
}

具体而言,这些输出:

i is 0
i is 1
i is 2
i is 3
i is 4

在JavaScript中,我们经常使用变量比它们创建时更晚的时间。当我们通过延迟输出以关闭转移到设置Timeout时:

for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
    setTimeout(_ => console.log(`i is ${i}`), 125/*ms*/);
}

for (var i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
    setTimeout(_ => console.log(`i is ${i}`), 125/*ms*/);
}

i is 5
i is 5
i is 5
i is 5
i is 5

使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here

function loop(arr) {
    // i IS known here, but undefined
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS NOT known here
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS known here, and has a value
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here
}

loop([1,2,3,4]);

for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS NOT known here
};

for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS known here, and has a value
};

loop([1,2,3,4]);

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here

今天使用安全吗?

有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。

事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:

此分類上一篇

如何跟踪浏览器支持