函数运行() { var foo = “Foo”; let bar = “Bar”; console.log(foo, bar); // Foo Bar { var Moo = “Mooo” let baz = “Bazz”; console.log(moo, baz); // Mooo Bazz } console.log(moo); // Mooo console.log(baz); // ReferenceError } run();

為什麼讓關鍵字被引入到語言是功能範圍是混亂的原因,是JavaScript的主要錯誤來源之一。

创建全球对象财产

在最高层次上,让我们不同于VAR,不会在全球对象上创造任何财产:

var foo = “Foo”; // 全球推翻的Let bar = “Bar”; // 不允许全球推翻的console.log(window.foo); // Foo console.log(window.bar); // undefined

“var”是函数分解,而“let”是区块分解。

您可以在函数中的任何地方使用变量,然后在函数中的任何地方使用变量,然后在函数中的任何地方使用变量。

或者你可以只是使用 Var 整个时间,因为你很不可能在一个函数内部发生范围冲突,然后你不需要跟踪你定义为允许或变量的变量。

有些人建议使用让所有时间,但这不是我的偏好,因为在许多其他编程语言的本地变量是功能的破坏,如果你使用其他,那么你可能会发现它更容易思考这个模式整个时间,而不是在使用JavaScript时更换。

使用Let

允许的关键词将变量声明连接到它所包含的任何区块的范围(通常是 {.. } 对),换句话说,允许随意窃取任何区块的范围为其变量声明。

让变量无法在窗口对象中访问,因为它们无法在全球范围内访问。

function a(){
    { // this is the Max Scope for let variable
        let x = 12;
    }
    console.log(x);
}
a(); // Uncaught ReferenceError: x is not defined

当使用VAR

在 ES5 中, var 和 variables 具有函数中的曲线,这意味着在函数内有效,而不是函数本身之外。

function a(){ // this is the Max Scope for var variable
    { 
        var x = 12;
    }
    console.log(x);
}
a(); // 12

如果你想知道更多,继续阅读下面

最著名的面试问题之一的范围也可能足以准确使用下列;

使用Let

for (let i = 0; i < 10 ; i++) {
    setTimeout(
        function a() {
            console.log(i); //print 0 to 9, that is literally AWW!!!
        }, 
        100 * i);
}

当使用VAR

for (var i = 0; i < 10 ; i++) {
    setTimeout(
        function a() {
            console.log(i); //print 10 times 10
        }, 
        100 * i);
}

这是因为在使用VAR时,对于每个曲线 iteration,变量被分解并共享副本。

此分類上一篇: <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <p> 點擊每個數字將登錄到主機:</p> <div id="div1">1</div> <div id="div2">2</div> <div id="div3">3</div> <div id="div4">4</div> <div id="div5">5</div>

每个单点处理器都会提到相同的对象,因为只有一个对象对象持有6个,所以你每次点击获得6个。

一个通用工作是将此插入一个匿名功能,并将它作为一个论点。 这种问题现在也可以通过使用,而不是在下面的代码中显示的变化来避免。

让它很有趣,因为它允许我们做这样的事情:

(() => {
    var count = 0;

    for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
        for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
            for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
                console.log(count++);
            }
        }
    }
})();

其次,有数以数以数。

在哪里

(() => {
    var count = 0;

    for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
        for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
            for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
                console.log(count++);
            }
        }
    }
})();

只有数数(0,1 )。

使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here

function loop(arr) {
    // i IS known here, but undefined
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS NOT known here
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS known here, and has a value
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here
}

loop([1,2,3,4]);

for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS NOT known here
};

for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS known here, and has a value
};

loop([1,2,3,4]);

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here

今天使用安全吗?

有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。

事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:

此分類上一篇

如何跟踪浏览器支持