“var”是函数分解,而“let”是区块分解。

您可以在函数中的任何地方使用变量,然后在函数中的任何地方使用变量,然后在函数中的任何地方使用变量。

或者你可以只是使用 Var 整个时间,因为你很不可能在一个函数内部发生范围冲突,然后你不需要跟踪你定义为允许或变量的变量。

有些人建议使用让所有时间,但这不是我的偏好,因为在许多其他编程语言的本地变量是功能的破坏,如果你使用其他,那么你可能会发现它更容易思考这个模式整个时间,而不是在使用JavaScript时更换。

// An array of adder functions.
var adderFunctions = [];

for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
  // We want the function at index i to add the index to its argument.
  adderFunctions[i] = function(x) {
    // What is i bound to here?
    return x + i;
  };
}

var add12 = adderFunctions[12];

// Uh oh. The function is bound to i in the outer scope, which is currently 1000.
console.log(add12(8) === 20); // => false
console.log(add12(8) === 1008); // => true
console.log(i); // => 1000

// It gets worse.
i = -8;
console.log(add12(8) === 0); // => true

上面的过程不会产生所需的函数序列,因为我的范围超越了每个函数创建的区块的 iteration。 相反,在环节结束时,每个函数的 i 关闭指在环节结束时的 i 值(1000)为每个在 adder 中的匿名函数。

// Let's try this again.
// NOTE: We're using another ES6 keyword, const, for values that won't
// be reassigned. const and let have similar scoping behavior.
const adderFunctions = [];

for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
  // NOTE: We're using the newer arrow function syntax this time, but 
  // using the "function(x) { ..." syntax from the previous example 
  // here would not change the behavior shown.
  adderFunctions[i] = x => x + i;
}

const add12 = adderFunctions[12];

// Yay! The behavior is as expected. 
console.log(add12(8) === 20); // => true

// i's scope doesn't extend outside the for loop.
console.log(i); // => ReferenceError: i is not defined

每个函数现在保留在函数创建时的 i 的值,并且 adderFunctions 按照预期行事。

现在,图像将两种行为混合在一起,你可能会看到为什么不建议在同一脚本中混合更新的Let和 const。

const doubleAdderFunctions = [];

for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
    const j = i;
    doubleAdderFunctions[i] = x => x + i + j;
}

const add18 = doubleAdderFunctions[9];
const add24 = doubleAdderFunctions[12];

// It's not fun debugging situations like this, especially when the
// code is more complex than in this example.
console.log(add18(24) === 42); // => false
console.log(add24(18) === 42); // => false
console.log(add18(24) === add24(18)); // => false
console.log(add18(24) === 2018); // => false
console.log(add24(18) === 2018); // => false
console.log(add18(24) === 1033); // => true
console.log(add24(18) === 1030); // => true

不要让这件事发生在你身上,使用灯具。

相反, var 可以像下面那样粘贴。 { console.log(cc); // undefined. 由于粘贴 var cc = 23; } { console.log(bb); // ReferenceError: bb 没有定义 let bb = 23; } 事实上, Per @Bergi, 两者都是粘贴。

函数 VS 区块范围:

与 var 和 let 的主要区别是,与 var 宣言的变量是函数分解的,而与 let 宣言的函数是区块分解的。

function testVar () {
  if(true) {
    var foo = 'foo';
  }

  console.log(foo);
}

testVar();  
// logs 'foo'


function testLet () {
  if(true) {
    let bar = 'bar';
  }

  console.log(bar);
}

testLet(); 
// reference error
// bar is scoped to the block of the if statement 

当第一个函数测试Var 被称为变量 foo 时,与 var 声明,仍然在 if 声明之外可用。

与Let的变量:

当第二个函数测试Let被称为变量栏,用Let表示,仅可在 if 声明中访问,因为用Let表示的变量是区块分开的(其中一个区块是曲线条之间的代码,例如,如果{},为{},函数{})。

请不要让变量变量:

变量与不要被抓住:

console.log(letVar);

let letVar = 10;
// referenceError, the variable doesn't get hoisted

与 var do 相容的变量:

console.log(varVar);

var varVar = 10;
// logs undefined, the variable gets hoisted

var bar = 5;
let foo  = 10;

console.log(bar); // logs 5
console.log(foo); // logs 10

console.log(window.bar);  
// logs 5, variable added to window object

console.log(window.foo);
// logs undefined, variable not added to window object

“var”是函数分解,而“let”是区块分解。

您可以在函数中的任何地方使用变量,然后在函数中的任何地方使用变量,然后在函数中的任何地方使用变量。

或者你可以只是使用 Var 整个时间,因为你很不可能在一个函数内部发生范围冲突,然后你不需要跟踪你定义为允许或变量的变量。

有些人建议使用让所有时间,但这不是我的偏好,因为在许多其他编程语言的本地变量是功能的破坏,如果你使用其他,那么你可能会发现它更容易思考这个模式整个时间,而不是在使用JavaScript时更换。

使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here

function loop(arr) {
    // i IS known here, but undefined
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS NOT known here
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS known here, and has a value
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here
}

loop([1,2,3,4]);

for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS NOT known here
};

for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS known here, and has a value
};

loop([1,2,3,4]);

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here

今天使用安全吗?

有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。

事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:

此分類上一篇

如何跟踪浏览器支持