I've been working with a small group of people on a coding project for fun. It's an organized and fairly cohesive group. The people I work with all have various skill sets related to programming, but some of them use older or outright wrong methods, such as excessive global variables, poor naming conventions, and other things. While things work, the implementation is poor. What's a good way to politely ask or introduce them to use better methodology, without it coming across as questioning (or insulting) their experience and/or education?


当前回答

代码标准的想法是一个很好的想法。

但考虑一下不要说什么,尤其是因为这是为了好玩,而且大概是和你的朋友。这只是代码……

其他回答

以一种非对抗性的方式提出一个更好的选择。

“嘿,我觉得这个方法也可以。你们怎么看?”[用手势表示屏幕上的代码明显更好]

我穿上长袍,打开一罐苏格拉底方法。

苏格拉底方法以古希腊哲学家苏格拉底的名字命名,是一种哲学探究的形式,提问者探究他人立场的含义,以激发理性思考和阐明思想。这种辩证方法经常涉及到一种对立的讨论,在这种讨论中,一种观点的辩护与另一种观点相对抗;一个参与者可能会导致另一个人在某种程度上自相矛盾,加强询问者自己的观点。

这完全取决于你写作的文化。在一个自由软件项目中,你告诉他们他们写的代码不好,并给出积极的建议、改进方法和反馈。你也可以给他们的代码发送一个补丁。

一封友好的电子邮件也不会有什么坏处。

Privately inquire about some of the "bad" code segments with an eye toward the possibility that it is actually reasonable code, (no matter how predisposed you may be), or that there are perhaps extenuating circumstances. If you are still convinced that the code is just plain bad -- and that the source actually is this person -- just go away. One of several things may happen: 1) the person notices and takes some corrective action, 2) the person does nothing (is oblivious, or doesn't care as much as you do).

如果#2发生了,或者从你的角度来看,#1并没有带来足够的改进,并且它正在损害项目,并且/或对你造成了足够的影响,那么可能是时候在团队中开始建立/执行标准了。这需要管理层的支持,但只有从基层做起才最有效。

祝你好运。我能感受到你的痛苦,兄弟。

没有人喜欢听别人说他们的工作很糟糕,但任何理智的人都会欢迎指导和避免不必要工作的方法。

有一种教学流派甚至说,你不应该指出错误,而应该专注于做对的事情。例如,与其指出难以理解的代码不好,不如指出他们的代码特别容易阅读的地方。在第一种情况下,你会引导其他人像蹩脚程序员一样思考和行动。在后一种情况下,你会像一个熟练的专业人士一样思考。