我已经尝试实现上述Jason所描述的算法;不幸的是，虽然在调试数学工作，我发现许多情况下，它不起作用。

例如，考虑点A(10,10) B(20,20) C(10,1) D(1,10) h=。5然而，通过检查可以清楚地看到，这些部分彼此一点也不接近。

将其绘制成图可以清楚地看出，0 < h < 1条件仅表明如果存在截距点，则截距点将位于CD上，而不告诉我们该点是否位于AB上。 为了确保有一个交叉点，你必须对变量g进行对称计算，拦截的要求是: 0 < g < 1 AND 0 < h < 1

我尝试了很多方法，然后我决定自己写。就是这样:

bool IsBetween (float x, float b1, float b2)
{
   return ( ((x >= (b1 - 0.1f)) && 
        (x <= (b2 + 0.1f))) || 
        ((x >= (b2 - 0.1f)) &&
        (x <= (b1 + 0.1f))));
}

bool IsSegmentsColliding(   POINTFLOAT lineA,
                POINTFLOAT lineB,
                POINTFLOAT line2A,
                POINTFLOAT line2B)
{
    float deltaX1 = lineB.x - lineA.x;
    float deltaX2 = line2B.x - line2A.x;
    float deltaY1 = lineB.y - lineA.y;
    float deltaY2 = line2B.y - line2A.y;

    if (abs(deltaX1) < 0.01f && 
        abs(deltaX2) < 0.01f) // Both are vertical lines
        return false;
    if (abs((deltaY1 / deltaX1) -
        (deltaY2 / deltaX2)) < 0.001f) // Two parallel line
        return false;

    float xCol = (  (   (deltaX1 * deltaX2) * 
                        (line2A.y - lineA.y)) - 
                    (line2A.x * deltaY2 * deltaX1) + 
                    (lineA.x * deltaY1 * deltaX2)) / 
                 ((deltaY1 * deltaX2) - (deltaY2 * deltaX1));
    float yCol = 0;
    if (deltaX1 < 0.01f) // L1 is a vertical line
        yCol = ((xCol * deltaY2) + 
                (line2A.y * deltaX2) - 
                (line2A.x * deltaY2)) / deltaX2;
    else // L1 is acceptable
        yCol = ((xCol * deltaY1) +
                (lineA.y * deltaX1) -
                (lineA.x * deltaY1)) / deltaX1;

    bool isCol =    IsBetween(xCol, lineA.x, lineB.x) &&
            IsBetween(yCol, lineA.y, lineB.y) &&
            IsBetween(xCol, line2A.x, line2B.x) &&
            IsBetween(yCol, line2A.y, line2B.y);
    return isCol;
}

根据这两个公式:(由直线方程和其他公式简化而来)

下面是一个基本的c#线段实现，并有相应的交点检测代码。它需要一个名为Vector2f的2D向量/点结构，不过你可以用任何其他具有X/Y属性的类型替换它。如果更适合你的需要，你也可以用double替换float。

这段代码用于我的. net物理库Boing。

public struct LineSegment2f
{
    public Vector2f From { get; }
    public Vector2f To { get; }

    public LineSegment2f(Vector2f @from, Vector2f to)
    {
        From = @from;
        To = to;
    }

    public Vector2f Delta => new Vector2f(To.X - From.X, To.Y - From.Y);

    /// <summary>
    /// Attempt to intersect two line segments.
    /// </summary>
    /// <remarks>
    /// Even if the line segments do not intersect, <paramref name="t"/> and <paramref name="u"/> will be set.
    /// If the lines are parallel, <paramref name="t"/> and <paramref name="u"/> are set to <see cref="float.NaN"/>.
    /// </remarks>
    /// <param name="other">The line to attempt intersection of this line with.</param>
    /// <param name="intersectionPoint">The point of intersection if within the line segments, or empty..</param>
    /// <param name="t">The distance along this line at which intersection would occur, or NaN if lines are collinear/parallel.</param>
    /// <param name="u">The distance along the other line at which intersection would occur, or NaN if lines are collinear/parallel.</param>
    /// <returns><c>true</c> if the line segments intersect, otherwise <c>false</c>.</returns>
    public bool TryIntersect(LineSegment2f other, out Vector2f intersectionPoint, out float t, out float u)
    {
        var p = From;
        var q = other.From;
        var r = Delta;
        var s = other.Delta;

        // t = (q − p) × s / (r × s)
        // u = (q − p) × r / (r × s)

        var denom = Fake2DCross(r, s);

        if (denom == 0)
        {
            // lines are collinear or parallel
            t = float.NaN;
            u = float.NaN;
            intersectionPoint = default(Vector2f);
            return false;
        }

        var tNumer = Fake2DCross(q - p, s);
        var uNumer = Fake2DCross(q - p, r);

        t = tNumer / denom;
        u = uNumer / denom;

        if (t < 0 || t > 1 || u < 0 || u > 1)
        {
            // line segments do not intersect within their ranges
            intersectionPoint = default(Vector2f);
            return false;
        }

        intersectionPoint = p + r * t;
        return true;
    }

    private static float Fake2DCross(Vector2f a, Vector2f b)
    {
        return a.X * b.Y - a.Y * b.X;
    }
}

人们似乎对Gavin的答案很感兴趣，cortijon在评论中提出了一个javascript版本，iMalc提供了一个计算量略少的版本。一些人指出了各种代码建议的缺点，另一些人则评论了一些代码建议的效率。

iMalc通过Gavin的答案提供的算法是我目前在一个javascript项目中使用的算法，我只是想在这里提供一个清理过的版本，如果它可以帮助到任何人的话。

// Some variables for reuse, others may do this differently
var p0x, p1x, p2x, p3x, ix,
    p0y, p1y, p2y, p3y, iy,
    collisionDetected;

// do stuff, call other functions, set endpoints...

// note: for my purpose I use |t| < |d| as opposed to
// |t| <= |d| which is equivalent to 0 <= t < 1 rather than
// 0 <= t <= 1 as in Gavin's answer - results may vary

var lineSegmentIntersection = function(){
    var d, dx1, dx2, dx3, dy1, dy2, dy3, s, t;

    dx1 = p1x - p0x;      dy1 = p1y - p0y;
    dx2 = p3x - p2x;      dy2 = p3y - p2y;
    dx3 = p0x - p2x;      dy3 = p0y - p2y;

    collisionDetected = 0;

    d = dx1 * dy2 - dx2 * dy1;

    if(d !== 0){
        s = dx1 * dy3 - dx3 * dy1;
        if((s <= 0 && d < 0 && s >= d) || (s >= 0 && d > 0 && s <= d)){
            t = dx2 * dy3 - dx3 * dy2;
            if((t <= 0 && d < 0 && t > d) || (t >= 0 && d > 0 && t < d)){
                t = t / d;
                collisionDetected = 1;
                ix = p0x + t * dx1;
                iy = p0y + t * dy1;
            }
        }
    }
};

曾经在这里被接受的答案是不正确的(它已经被不接受了，所以万岁!)它不能正确地消除所有非交点。简单地说，它可能有效，但也可能失败，特别是在0和1被认为对h有效的情况下。

考虑以下情况:

直线(4,1)-(5,1)和(0,0)-(0,2)

这两条垂线显然不重叠。

= (4,1) B =(5、1) C = (0, 0) D = (0, 2) E = (1) - (4,1) = (1,0) F = (0, 2) - (0, 0) = (0, 2) P = (0, 1) h =((4,1) -(0, 0))点(0,1)/((0,2)点(0,1))= 0

根据上面的答案，这两条线段在端点处相遇(值为0和1)。该端点为:

(0, 0) + (0, 2) * 0 = (0, 0)

So, apparently the two line segments meet at (0,0), which is on line CD, but not on line AB. So what is going wrong? The answer is that the values of 0 and 1 are not valid and only sometimes HAPPEN to correctly predict endpoint intersection. When the extension of one line (but not the other) would meet the line segment, the algorithm predicts an intersection of line segments, but this is not correct. I imagine that by testing starting with AB vs CD and then also testing with CD vs AB, this problem would be eliminated. Only if both fall between 0 and 1 inclusively can they be said to intersect.

如果你必须预测端点，我建议使用向量叉乘法。

-Dan

基于@Gareth Rees的回答，Python版本:

import numpy as np

def np_perp( a ) :
    b = np.empty_like(a)
    b[0] = a[1]
    b[1] = -a[0]
    return b

def np_cross_product(a, b):
    return np.dot(a, np_perp(b))

def np_seg_intersect(a, b, considerCollinearOverlapAsIntersect = False):
    # https://stackoverflow.com/questions/563198/how-do-you-detect-where-two-line-segments-intersect/565282#565282
    # http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/862988/Find-the-intersection-point-of-two-line-segments
    r = a[1] - a[0]
    s = b[1] - b[0]
    v = b[0] - a[0]
    num = np_cross_product(v, r)
    denom = np_cross_product(r, s)
    # If r x s = 0 and (q - p) x r = 0, then the two lines are collinear.
    if np.isclose(denom, 0) and np.isclose(num, 0):
        # 1. If either  0 <= (q - p) * r <= r * r or 0 <= (p - q) * s <= * s
        # then the two lines are overlapping,
        if(considerCollinearOverlapAsIntersect):
            vDotR = np.dot(v, r)
            aDotS = np.dot(-v, s)
            if (0 <= vDotR  and vDotR <= np.dot(r,r)) or (0 <= aDotS  and aDotS <= np.dot(s,s)):
                return True
        # 2. If neither 0 <= (q - p) * r = r * r nor 0 <= (p - q) * s <= s * s
        # then the two lines are collinear but disjoint.
        # No need to implement this expression, as it follows from the expression above.
        return None
    if np.isclose(denom, 0) and not np.isclose(num, 0):
        # Parallel and non intersecting
        return None
    u = num / denom
    t = np_cross_product(v, s) / denom
    if u >= 0 and u <= 1 and t >= 0 and t <= 1:
        res = b[0] + (s*u)
        return res
    # Otherwise, the two line segments are not parallel but do not intersect.
    return None