试试这个，效果很好

  private static readonly FileSystemWatcher Watcher = new FileSystemWatcher();
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Watching....");

        Watcher.Path = @"D:\Temp\Watcher";
        Watcher.Changed += OnChanged;
        Watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
        Console.ReadKey();
    }

    static void OnChanged(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {
        try
        {
            Watcher.Changed -= OnChanged;
            Watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = false;
            Console.WriteLine($"File Changed. Name: {e.Name}");
        }
        catch (Exception exception)
        {
            Console.WriteLine(exception);
        }
        finally
        {
            Watcher.Changed += OnChanged;
            Watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
        }
    }

恐怕这是FileSystemWatcher类的一个众所周知的错误/特性。这是来自类的文档:

You may notice in certain situations that a single creation event generates multiple Created events that are handled by your component. For example, if you use a FileSystemWatcher component to monitor the creation of new files in a directory, and then test it by using Notepad to create a file, you may see two Created events generated even though only a single file was created. This is because Notepad performs multiple file system actions during the writing process. Notepad writes to the disk in batches that create the content of the file and then the file attributes. Other applications may perform in the same manner. Because FileSystemWatcher monitors the operating system activities, all events that these applications fire will be picked up.

现在这段文本是关于Created事件的，但同样的事情也适用于其他文件事件。在一些应用程序中，您可能能够通过使用NotifyFilter属性来解决这个问题，但我的经验是，有时您还必须进行一些手动重复过滤(hacks)。

前段时间我书签了一个页面，里面有一些FileSystemWatcher技巧。你可能会想去看看。

试试下面的代码:

class WatchPlotDirectory
{
    bool let = false;
    FileSystemWatcher watcher;
    string path = "C:/Users/jamie/OneDrive/Pictures/Screenshots";

    public WatchPlotDirectory()
    {
        watcher = new FileSystemWatcher();
        watcher.Path = path;
        watcher.NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastAccess | NotifyFilters.LastWrite
                               | NotifyFilters.FileName | NotifyFilters.DirectoryName;
        watcher.Filter = "*.*";
        watcher.Changed += new FileSystemEventHandler(OnChanged);
        watcher.Renamed += new RenamedEventHandler(OnRenamed);
        watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
    }



    void OnChanged(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {
        if (let==false) {
            string mgs = string.Format("File {0} | {1}",
                                       e.FullPath, e.ChangeType);
            Console.WriteLine("onchange: " + mgs);
            let = true;
        }

        else
        {
            let = false;
        }


    }

    void OnRenamed(object sender, RenamedEventArgs e)
    {
        string log = string.Format("{0} | Renamed from {1}",
                                   e.FullPath, e.OldName);
        Console.WriteLine("onrenamed: " + log);

    }

    public void setPath(string path)
    {
        this.path = path;
    }
}

您可以尝试打开它进行写入，如果成功，则可以假设其他应用程序已经处理了该文件。

private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
    try
    {
        using (var fs = File.OpenWrite(e.FullPath))
        {
        }
        //do your stuff
    }
    catch (Exception)
    {
        //no write access, other app not done
    }
}

仅仅打开它以供写入似乎不会引发已更改的事件。所以应该是安全的。

一直在寻找答案，但我想到了一个肮脏的解决方案。因为我的事件触发了两次，所以第二个动作什么也不做。

       $count = 1
       $action = { 
            if($count -eq 1){                  
                #DO SOMETHING
                $count = 2 
            }else{
                $count = 1
            }
        }  

一个可能的“黑客”是使用响应式扩展来限制事件，例如:

var watcher = new FileSystemWatcher("./");

Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventArgs>(watcher, "Changed")
            .Throttle(new TimeSpan(500000))
            .Subscribe(HandleChangeEvent);

watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;

在本例中，我将设置为50ms，在我的系统上这就足够了，但更高的值应该更安全。(就像我说的，这仍然是一个“hack”)。