我有一个应用程序,我正在寻找一个文本文件,如果对文件做了任何更改,我使用OnChanged事件处理程序来处理事件。我正在使用NotifyFilters。LastWriteTime,但是事件仍然被触发两次。这是代码。

public void Initialize()
{
   FileSystemWatcher _fileWatcher = new FileSystemWatcher();
  _fileWatcher.Path = "C:\\Folder";
  _fileWatcher.NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastWrite;
  _fileWatcher.Filter = "Version.txt";
  _fileWatcher.Changed += new FileSystemEventHandler(OnChanged);
  _fileWatcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
}

private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
   .......
}

在我的情况下,OnChanged被调用两次,当我改变文本文件version.txt并保存它。


当前回答

我简单地添加了一个dupe检查如下:

 private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {
        string sTabName = Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension(e.Name);
        string sLastLine = ReadLastLine(e.FullPath);
        if(sLastLine != _dupeCheck)
        {
            TabPage tp = tcLogs.TabPages[sTabName];
            TextBox tbLog = (TextBox)tp.Controls[0] as TextBox;

            tbLog.Invoke(new Action(() => tbLog.AppendText(sLastLine + Environment.NewLine)));
            tbLog.Invoke(new Action(() => tbLog.SelectionStart = tbLog.Text.Length));
            tbLog.Invoke(new Action(() => tbLog.ScrollToCaret()));
            _dupeCheck = sLastLine;
        }
    }

    public static String ReadLastLine(string path)
    {
        return ReadLastLine(path, Encoding.Default, "\n");
    }

    public static String ReadLastLine(string path, Encoding encoding, string newline)
    {
        int charsize = encoding.GetByteCount("\n");
        byte[] buffer = encoding.GetBytes(newline);
        using (FileStream stream = new FileStream(path, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.ReadWrite))
        {
            long endpos = stream.Length / charsize;
            for (long pos = charsize; pos < endpos; pos += charsize)
            {
                stream.Seek(-pos, SeekOrigin.End);
                stream.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
                if (encoding.GetString(buffer) == newline)
                {
                    buffer = new byte[stream.Length - stream.Position];
                    stream.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
                    return encoding.GetString(buffer);
                }
            }
        }
        return null;
    }

    [DllImport("user32.dll", CharSet = CharSet.Auto)]
    private static extern int SendMessage(IntPtr hWnd, int wMsg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam);

    private const int WM_VSCROLL = 0x115;
    private const int SB_BOTTOM = 7;

    /// <summary>
    /// Scrolls the vertical scroll bar of a multi-line text box to the bottom.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="tb">The text box to scroll</param>
    public static void ScrollToBottom(TextBox tb)
    {
        SendMessage(tb.Handle, WM_VSCROLL, (IntPtr)SB_BOTTOM, IntPtr.Zero);
    }

其他回答

很多答案都令人震惊,真的。 这里有一些代码从我的XanderUI控件库修复这个问题。

private void OnChanged(object sender, FilesystemEventArgs e)
{
    if (FSWatcher.IncludeSubdirectories == true)
    {
        if (File.Exists(e.FullPath)) { DO YOUR FILE CHANGE STUFF HERE... }
    }
    else DO YOUR DIRECTORY CHANGE STUFF HERE...
}

解决方案实际上取决于用例。您是否在注意不更改的新文件,或每隔一段时间更改一次的文件或经常更改的文件?在我的情况下,它的变化不太频繁,我不想错过任何这些变化。

但是我也不想在写入过程尚未完成写入的地方发生更改事件。

在我的情况下,我注意到6 (6 !!)onchange事件写一个125字符的txt文件。

我的解决方案是民意调查和改变事件的混合,民意调查经常被消极地看待。正常轮询比较慢,比如每10秒一次,以防FileSystemWatcher (FSW)“错过”一个事件。轮询立即响应FSW更改事件。

关键是在FSW。更改事件时,轮询速度加快,例如每100毫秒,并等待直到文件稳定。因此我们有了“两阶段轮询”:阶段1比较慢,但在FSW文件更改事件时立即响应。第二阶段是快速的,等待一个稳定的文件。

如果FSW检测到多个文件更改,每个事件都会加速轮询循环,并有效地启动一个新的短等待周期。只有在轮询循环检测到上次写入时文件没有进一步的变化之后,它才假定文件是稳定的,并且您的代码可以处理更改后的文件。

我选择了10秒和100毫秒的超时,但是您的用例可能需要不同的超时值。

这里是轮询,其中AppConfig。fiIO是要注意的FileInfo:

private readonly EventWaitHandle ewhTimeout = new AutoResetEvent(false);

private void TwoPhasedPolling()
{
    bool WaitForChange = true; //false: wait until stable
    DateTime LastWriteTime = DateTime.MinValue;
    while (true)
    {
        // wait for next poll (timeout), or FSW event
        bool GotOne = ewhTimeout.WaitOne(WaitForChange ? 10 * 1000 : 100);
        if (GotOne)
        {
            // WaitOne interrupted: end of Phase1: FSW detected file change
            WaitForChange = false;
        }
        else
        {
            // WaitOne timed out: Phase2: check file write time for change
            if (AppConfig.fiIO.LastWriteTime > LastWriteTime)
            {
                LastWriteTime = AppConfig.fiIO.LastWriteTime;
            }
            else
            {
                // End of Phase2: file has changed and is stable
                WaitForChange = true;
                // action on changed file
                ... your code here ...
            }}}}

private void fileSystemWatcher1_Changed(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
    ewhTimeout.Set();
}

NB:是的,我也不喜欢}}}},但它使列表更短,这样你就不必滚动了:-)

我的场景是,我有一个虚拟机,其中有一个Linux服务器。我正在Windows主机上开发文件。当我在主机上的一个文件夹中更改某些内容时,我希望所有的更改都被上传,并通过Ftp同步到虚拟服务器上。这是我如何消除重复更改事件当我写入一个文件(这标志着包含文件要修改的文件夹):

private Hashtable fileWriteTime = new Hashtable();

private void fsw_sync_Changed(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
    string path = e.FullPath.ToString();
    string currentLastWriteTime = File.GetLastWriteTime( e.FullPath ).ToString();

    // if there is no path info stored yet
    // or stored path has different time of write then the one now is inspected
    if ( !fileWriteTime.ContainsKey(path) ||
         fileWriteTime[path].ToString() != currentLastWriteTime
    )
    {
        //then we do the main thing
        log( "A CHANGE has occured with " + path );

        //lastly we update the last write time in the hashtable
        fileWriteTime[path] = currentLastWriteTime;
    }
}

我主要创建一个哈希表来存储文件写时间信息。然后,如果哈希表有被修改的文件路径,并且它的时间值与当前通知的文件更改相同,那么我就知道它是事件的副本,并忽略它。

主要是为了未来的我:)

我用Rx写了一个包装器:

 public class WatcherWrapper : IDisposable
{
    private readonly FileSystemWatcher _fileWatcher;
    private readonly Subject<FileSystemEventArgs> _infoSubject;
    private Subject<FileSystemEventArgs> _eventSubject;

    public WatcherWrapper(string path, string nameFilter = "*.*", NotifyFilters? notifyFilters = null)
    {
        _fileWatcher = new FileSystemWatcher(path, nameFilter);

        if (notifyFilters != null)
        {
            _fileWatcher.NotifyFilter = notifyFilters.Value;
        }

        _infoSubject = new Subject<FileSystemEventArgs>();
        _eventSubject = new Subject<FileSystemEventArgs>();

        Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventArgs>(_fileWatcher, "Changed").Select(e => e.EventArgs)
            .Subscribe(_infoSubject.OnNext);
        Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventArgs>(_fileWatcher, "Created").Select(e => e.EventArgs)
            .Subscribe(_infoSubject.OnNext);
        Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventArgs>(_fileWatcher, "Deleted").Select(e => e.EventArgs)
            .Subscribe(_infoSubject.OnNext);
        Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventArgs>(_fileWatcher, "Renamed").Select(e => e.EventArgs)
            .Subscribe(_infoSubject.OnNext);

        // this takes care of double events and still works with changing the name of the same file after a while
        _infoSubject.Buffer(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(20))
            .Select(x => x.GroupBy(z => z.FullPath).Select(z => z.LastOrDefault()).Subscribe(
                infos =>
                {
                    if (infos != null)
                        foreach (var info in infos)
                        {
                            {
                                _eventSubject.OnNext(info);
                            }
                        }
                });

        _fileWatcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
    }

    public IObservable<FileSystemEventArgs> FileEvents => _eventSubject;


    public void Dispose()
    {
        _fileWatcher?.Dispose();
        _eventSubject.Dispose();
        _infoSubject.Dispose();
    }
}

用法:

var watcher = new WatcherWrapper(_path, "*.info");
// all more complicated and scenario specific filtering of events can be done here    
watcher.FileEvents.Where(x => x.ChangeType != WatcherChangeTypes.Deleted).Subscribe(x => //do stuff)

一个可能的“黑客”是使用响应式扩展来限制事件,例如:

var watcher = new FileSystemWatcher("./");

Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventArgs>(watcher, "Changed")
            .Throttle(new TimeSpan(500000))
            .Subscribe(HandleChangeEvent);

watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;

在本例中,我将设置为50ms,在我的系统上这就足够了,但更高的值应该更安全。(就像我说的,这仍然是一个“hack”)。