我简单地添加了一个dupe检查如下:

 private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {
        string sTabName = Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension(e.Name);
        string sLastLine = ReadLastLine(e.FullPath);
        if(sLastLine != _dupeCheck)
        {
            TabPage tp = tcLogs.TabPages[sTabName];
            TextBox tbLog = (TextBox)tp.Controls[0] as TextBox;

            tbLog.Invoke(new Action(() => tbLog.AppendText(sLastLine + Environment.NewLine)));
            tbLog.Invoke(new Action(() => tbLog.SelectionStart = tbLog.Text.Length));
            tbLog.Invoke(new Action(() => tbLog.ScrollToCaret()));
            _dupeCheck = sLastLine;
        }
    }

    public static String ReadLastLine(string path)
    {
        return ReadLastLine(path, Encoding.Default, "\n");
    }

    public static String ReadLastLine(string path, Encoding encoding, string newline)
    {
        int charsize = encoding.GetByteCount("\n");
        byte[] buffer = encoding.GetBytes(newline);
        using (FileStream stream = new FileStream(path, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.ReadWrite))
        {
            long endpos = stream.Length / charsize;
            for (long pos = charsize; pos < endpos; pos += charsize)
            {
                stream.Seek(-pos, SeekOrigin.End);
                stream.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
                if (encoding.GetString(buffer) == newline)
                {
                    buffer = new byte[stream.Length - stream.Position];
                    stream.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
                    return encoding.GetString(buffer);
                }
            }
        }
        return null;
    }

    [DllImport("user32.dll", CharSet = CharSet.Auto)]
    private static extern int SendMessage(IntPtr hWnd, int wMsg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam);

    private const int WM_VSCROLL = 0x115;
    private const int SB_BOTTOM = 7;

    /// <summary>
    /// Scrolls the vertical scroll bar of a multi-line text box to the bottom.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="tb">The text box to scroll</param>
    public static void ScrollToBottom(TextBox tb)
    {
        SendMessage(tb.Handle, WM_VSCROLL, (IntPtr)SB_BOTTOM, IntPtr.Zero);
    }

主要原因是 第一个事件的最后一次访问时间是当前时间(文件写入或更改时间)。 第二个事件是文件最初的最后一次访问时间。 我在代码下解决。

        var lastRead = DateTime.MinValue;

        Watcher = new FileSystemWatcher(...)
        {
            NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.FileName | NotifyFilters.LastWrite,
            Filter = "*.dll",
            IncludeSubdirectories = false,
        };
        Watcher.Changed += (senderObject, ea) =>
        {
            var now = DateTime.Now;
            var lastWriteTime = File.GetLastWriteTime(ea.FullPath);

            if (now == lastWriteTime)
            {
                return;
            }

            if (lastWriteTime != lastRead)
            {
                // do something...
                lastRead = lastWriteTime;
            }
        };

        Watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;

以下是我的方法:

// Consider having a List<String> named _changedFiles

private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
    lock (_changedFiles)
    {
        if (_changedFiles.Contains(e.FullPath))
        {
            return;
        }
        _changedFiles.Add(e.FullPath);
    }

    // do your stuff

    System.Timers.Timer timer = new Timer(1000) { AutoReset = false };
    timer.Elapsed += (timerElapsedSender, timerElapsedArgs) =>
    {
        lock (_changedFiles)
        {
            _changedFiles.Remove(e.FullPath);
        }
    };
   timer.Start();
}

这是我在一个项目中用来解决这个问题的解决方案，在该项目中，我将文件作为附件发送到邮件中。 它可以很容易地避免两次触发事件，即使是一个较小的定时器间隔，但在我的情况下，1000是可以的，因为我更喜欢错过一些变化，而不是每秒用> 1条消息淹没邮箱。 至少在同时更改多个文件的情况下，它可以正常工作。

Another solution I've thought of would be to replace the list with a dictionary mapping files to their respective MD5, so you wouldn't have to choose an arbitrary interval since you wouldn't have to delete the entry but update its value, and cancel your stuff if it hasn't changed. It has the downside of having a Dictionary growing in memory as files are monitored and eating more and more memory, but I've read somewhere that the amount of files monitored depends on the FSW's internal buffer, so maybe not that critical. Dunno how MD5 computing time would affect your code's performances either, careful =\

我认为解决这个问题的最佳方案是使用响应式扩展 当你将事件转换为可观察对象时，你可以添加Throttling(..)(最初称为Debounce(..))

这里是示例代码

        var templatesWatcher = new FileSystemWatcher(settingsSnapshot.Value.TemplatesDirectory)
        {
            NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastWrite,
            IncludeSubdirectories = true
        };

        templatesWatcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;

        Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventHandler, FileSystemEventArgs>(
                addHandler => templatesWatcher.Changed += addHandler,
                removeHandler => templatesWatcher.Changed -= removeHandler)
            .Throttle(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5))
            .Subscribe(args =>
            {
                _logger.LogInformation($"Template file {args.EventArgs.Name} has changed");
                //TODO do something
            });

好吧，这是我如何只引发一个事件的解决方案:

FileSystemWatcheк watcher = new FileSystemWatcher();

//'path' - path to the file that has been modified.
watcher.Changed += (s, e) => FileChanged(path);

这里是FileChanged实现

//count is our counter to triger when we can raise and when not.
private int count = 0;
private void FileChanged(string path)
{
   if (count % 2 == 0)
     {
       //code here
     }

     count ++;
}

我花了大量时间使用FileSystemWatcher，这里的一些方法将不起作用。我真的很喜欢禁用事件的方法，但不幸的是，它不工作，如果有>1文件被丢弃，第二个文件将错过大多数，如果不是所有的时间。 所以我使用以下方法:

private void EventCallback(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
    var fileName = e.FullPath;

    if (!File.Exists(fileName))
    {
        // We've dealt with the file, this is just supressing further events.
        return;
    }

    // File exists, so move it to a working directory. 
    File.Move(fileName, [working directory]);

    // Kick-off whatever processing is required.
}