这个解决方案适用于我的生产应用程序:

环境:

VB。Net Framework 4.5.2

手动设置对象属性:NotifyFilter = Size

然后使用下面的代码:

Public Class main
    Dim CalledOnce = False
    Private Sub FileSystemWatcher1_Changed(sender As Object, e As IO.FileSystemEventArgs) Handles FileSystemWatcher1.Changed
            If (CalledOnce = False) Then
                CalledOnce = True
                If (e.ChangeType = 4) Then
                    ' Do task...
                CalledOnce = False
            End If
        End Sub
End Sub

恐怕这是FileSystemWatcher类的一个众所周知的错误/特性。这是来自类的文档:

You may notice in certain situations that a single creation event generates multiple Created events that are handled by your component. For example, if you use a FileSystemWatcher component to monitor the creation of new files in a directory, and then test it by using Notepad to create a file, you may see two Created events generated even though only a single file was created. This is because Notepad performs multiple file system actions during the writing process. Notepad writes to the disk in batches that create the content of the file and then the file attributes. Other applications may perform in the same manner. Because FileSystemWatcher monitors the operating system activities, all events that these applications fire will be picked up.

现在这段文本是关于Created事件的，但同样的事情也适用于其他文件事件。在一些应用程序中，您可能能够通过使用NotifyFilter属性来解决这个问题，但我的经验是，有时您还必须进行一些手动重复过滤(hacks)。

前段时间我书签了一个页面，里面有一些FileSystemWatcher技巧。你可能会想去看看。

我简单地添加了一个dupe检查如下:

 private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {
        string sTabName = Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension(e.Name);
        string sLastLine = ReadLastLine(e.FullPath);
        if(sLastLine != _dupeCheck)
        {
            TabPage tp = tcLogs.TabPages[sTabName];
            TextBox tbLog = (TextBox)tp.Controls[0] as TextBox;

            tbLog.Invoke(new Action(() => tbLog.AppendText(sLastLine + Environment.NewLine)));
            tbLog.Invoke(new Action(() => tbLog.SelectionStart = tbLog.Text.Length));
            tbLog.Invoke(new Action(() => tbLog.ScrollToCaret()));
            _dupeCheck = sLastLine;
        }
    }

    public static String ReadLastLine(string path)
    {
        return ReadLastLine(path, Encoding.Default, "\n");
    }

    public static String ReadLastLine(string path, Encoding encoding, string newline)
    {
        int charsize = encoding.GetByteCount("\n");
        byte[] buffer = encoding.GetBytes(newline);
        using (FileStream stream = new FileStream(path, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.ReadWrite))
        {
            long endpos = stream.Length / charsize;
            for (long pos = charsize; pos < endpos; pos += charsize)
            {
                stream.Seek(-pos, SeekOrigin.End);
                stream.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
                if (encoding.GetString(buffer) == newline)
                {
                    buffer = new byte[stream.Length - stream.Position];
                    stream.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
                    return encoding.GetString(buffer);
                }
            }
        }
        return null;
    }

    [DllImport("user32.dll", CharSet = CharSet.Auto)]
    private static extern int SendMessage(IntPtr hWnd, int wMsg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam);

    private const int WM_VSCROLL = 0x115;
    private const int SB_BOTTOM = 7;

    /// <summary>
    /// Scrolls the vertical scroll bar of a multi-line text box to the bottom.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="tb">The text box to scroll</param>
    public static void ScrollToBottom(TextBox tb)
    {
        SendMessage(tb.Handle, WM_VSCROLL, (IntPtr)SB_BOTTOM, IntPtr.Zero);
    }

这已经很晚了，但我最近遇到了这个问题，然后我想发表我的一点贡献。

首先，许多建议的解决方案都适用于单个更新的文件，而我需要在较短的时间内(几十毫秒)收到关于2-3个更改文件的通知，而重复时间相对较长(几十秒到几分钟)。

早期建议的最有趣的链接之一是FileSystemWatcher is a Bit Broken。然而，所提出的解决方案只是部分工作，正如同一作者在。net MemoryCache Expiration Demystified的不稳定行为中指出的那样，即使在20秒后也会发出通知。

然后我所做的是基于类似的原则设计一个愚蠢的替代解决方案，没有MemoryCache。

基本上，它创建了一个List<>的项目，其中有一个Key，它是文件的完整路径和一个过期计时器。如果另一个事件再次触发该更改，则在列表中找到该元素，计时器将更新为新的过期时间。 根据经验，过期时间足够长，足以在单个OnStableChange通知中收集多个事件，而不会太长，以至于感觉没有响应。

当你实例化Whatever时，你也将它链接到一个目录和一个非常基本的外部回调。

没有什么是真正优化的，我只是在几行中寻找一个解决方案。

我把它发表在这里

对我来说，这样你就可以在另一个应用程序上验证 某个更聪明、更有经验的人可以改进它，并帮助我了解它的不足之处

    internal class Whatever
    {
        private FileSystemWatcher? watcher = null;

        public delegate void DelegateFileChange(string path);
        public DelegateFileChange? onChange;

        private const int CacheTimeMilliseconds = 200;

        private class ChangeItem
        {
            public delegate void DelegateChangeItem(string key);
            public string Key { get; set; } = "";
            public System.Timers.Timer Expiration = new();
            public DelegateChangeItem? SignalChanged = null;
        }
        private class ChangeCache
        {
            private readonly List<ChangeItem> _changes = new();

            public void Set(string key, int milliSecs, ChangeItem.DelegateChangeItem? signal = null)
            {
                lock (_changes)
                {
                    ChangeItem? existing = _changes.Find(item => item.Key == key);
                    if (existing != null)
                    {
                        existing.Expiration.Interval = milliSecs;
                        existing.SignalChanged = signal;
                    }
                    else
                    {
                        ChangeItem change = new()
                        {
                            Key = key,
                            SignalChanged = signal
                        };
                        change.Expiration.Interval = milliSecs;
                        change.Expiration.AutoReset = false;
                        change.Expiration.Elapsed += delegate { Change_Elapsed(key); };
                        change.Expiration.Enabled = true;
                        _changes.Add(change);
                    }
                }
            }

            private void Change_Elapsed(string key)
            {
                lock (_changes)
                {
                    ChangeItem? existing = _changes.Find(item => item.Key == key);
                    existing?.SignalChanged?.Invoke(key);
                    _changes.RemoveAll(item => item.Key == key);
                }
            }
        }

        private ChangeCache changeCache = new();

        public bool Link(string directory, DelegateFileChange? fileChange = null)
        {
            bool result = false;

            try
            {
                if (Directory.Exists(directory))
                {
                    watcher = new FileSystemWatcher(directory);
                    watcher.NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastWrite;
                    watcher.Changed += Watcher_Changed;

                    onChange = fileChange;

                    watcher.Filter = "*.*";
                    watcher.IncludeSubdirectories = true;
                    watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;

                    result = true;
                }
            }
            catch (Exception)
            {
            }

            return result;
        }

        private void OnStableChange(string path)
        {
            if (File.Exists(path))
            {
                onChange?.Invoke(path);
            }
        }

        public void Watcher_Changed(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
        {
            changeCache.Set(e.FullPath, CacheTimeMilliseconds, OnStableChange);
        }
    }

我必须结合以上文章中的几个想法，并添加文件锁定检查，让它为我工作:

FileSystemWatcher fileSystemWatcher;

private void DirectoryWatcher_Start()
{
    FileSystemWatcher fileSystemWatcher = new FileSystemWatcher
    {
        Path = @"c:\mypath",
        NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastWrite,
        Filter = "*.*",
        EnableRaisingEvents = true
    };

    fileSystemWatcher.Changed += new FileSystemEventHandler(DirectoryWatcher_OnChanged);
}

private static void WaitUntilFileIsUnlocked(String fullPath, Action<String> callback, FileAccess fileAccess = FileAccess.Read, Int32 timeoutMS = 10000)
{
    Int32 waitMS = 250;
    Int32 currentMS = 0;
    FileInfo file = new FileInfo(fullPath);
    FileStream stream = null;
    do
    {
        try
        {
            stream = file.Open(FileMode.Open, fileAccess, FileShare.None);
            stream.Close();
            callback(fullPath);
            return;
        }
        catch (IOException)
        {
        }
        finally
        {
            if (stream != null)
                stream.Dispose();
        }
        Thread.Sleep(waitMS);
        currentMS += waitMS;
    } while (currentMS < timeoutMS);
}    

private static Dictionary<String, DateTime> DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache = new Dictionary<String, DateTime>();

private void DirectoryWatcher_OnChanged(Object source, FileSystemEventArgs ev)
{
    try
    {
        lock (DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache)
        {
            DateTime lastWriteTime = File.GetLastWriteTime(ev.FullPath);
            if (DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache.ContainsKey(ev.FullPath))
            {
                if (DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache[ev.FullPath].AddMilliseconds(500) >= lastWriteTime)
                    return;     // file was already handled
            }

            DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache[ev.FullPath] = lastWriteTime;
        }

        Task.Run(() => WaitUntilFileIsUnlocked(ev.FullPath, fullPath =>
        {
            // do the job with fullPath...
        }));

    }
    catch (Exception e)
    {
        // handle exception
    }
}

一个可能的“黑客”是使用响应式扩展来限制事件，例如:

var watcher = new FileSystemWatcher("./");

Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventArgs>(watcher, "Changed")
            .Throttle(new TimeSpan(500000))
            .Subscribe(HandleChangeEvent);

watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;

在本例中，我将设置为50ms，在我的系统上这就足够了，但更高的值应该更安全。(就像我说的，这仍然是一个“hack”)。