如果你想使用功能强大的高级工具，而不是自己构建一切，那么阅读本课程的项目和阅读材料是一个很好的选择。这是一门语言课程，由Java解析器引擎ANTLR的作者编写。你可以从Pragmatic Programmers网站上获得这门课程的PDF版本。

The course goes over the standard compiler compiler stuff that you'd see elsewhere: parsing, types and type checking, polymorphism, symbol tables, and code generation. Pretty much the only thing that isn't covered is optimizations. The final project is a program that compiles a subset of C. Because you use tools like ANTLR and LLVM, it's feasible to write the entire compiler in a single day (I have an existence proof of this, though I do mean ~24 hours). It's heavy on practical engineering using modern tools, a bit lighter on theory.

顺便说一下，LLVM非常棒。在许多情况下，你可能会编译到汇编，你最好编译到LLVM的中间表示。它是更高级别的、跨平台的，LLVM非常擅长从中生成优化的程序集。

龙之书绝对是关于“构建编译器”的书，但是如果您的语言不像当前这一代语言那么复杂，那么您可能想看看设计模式中的解释器模式。

书中的示例设计了一种类似正则表达式的语言，并且经过了深思熟虑，但正如书中所述，它有助于思考整个过程，但实际上只在小型语言上有效。然而，用这种模式为一种小型语言编写解释器要快得多，而不必学习所有不同类型的解析器，yacc和lex等等……

看看下面这本书。作者是ANTLR的创建者。

语言实现模式:创建您自己的领域特定语言和通用编程语言。

抱歉，这是西班牙文，但这是阿根廷一门名为“Compiladores e Intérpretes”(编译器和口译员)的课程的参考书目。

这门课程从形式化语言理论到编译器构造，这些是你至少构建一个简单的编译器所需要的主题:

Compilers Design in C. Allen I. Holub Prentice-Hall. 1990. Compiladores. Teoría y Construcción. Sanchís Llorca, F.J. , Galán Pascual, C. Editorial Paraninfo. 1988. Compiler Construction. Niklaus Wirth Addison-Wesley. 1996. Lenguajes, Gramáticas y Autómatas. Un enfoque práctico. Pedro Isasi Viñuela, Paloma Martínez Fernández, Daniel Borrajo Millán. Addison-Wesley Iberoamericana (España). 1997. The art of compiler design. Theory and practice. Thomas Pittman, James Peters. Prentice-Hall. 1992. Object-Oriented Compiler Construction. Jim Holmes. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 1995 Compiladores. Conceptos Fundamentales. B. Teufel, S. Schmidt, T. Teufel. Addison-Wesley Iberoamericana. 1995. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. John E. Hopcroft. Jeffref D. Ullman. Addison-Wesley. 1979. Introduction to formal languages. György E. Révész. Mc Graw Hill. 1983. Parsing Techniques. A Practical Guide. Dick Grune, Ceriel Jacobs. Impreso por los autores. 1995 http://www.cs.vu.nl/~dick/PTAPG.html Yacc: Yet Another Compiler-Compiler. Stephen C. Johnson Computing Science Technical Report Nº 32, 1975. Bell Laboratories. Murray Hill, New Jersey. Lex: A Lexical Analyzer Generator. M. E. Lesk, E. Schmidt. Computing Science Technical Report Nº 39, 1975. Bell Laboratories. Murray Hill, New Jersey. lex & yacc. John R. Levine, Tony Mason, Doug Brown. O’Reilly & Associates. 1995. Elements of the theory of computation. Harry R. Lewis, Christos H. Papadimitriou. Segunda Edición. Prentice Hall. 1998. Un Algoritmo Eficiente para la Construcción del Grafo de Dependencia de Control. Salvador V. Cavadini. Trabajo Final de Grado para obtener el Título de Ingeniero en Computación. Facultad de Matemática Aplicada. U.C.S.E. 2001.

最快的方法是读两本书:

JP Bennett的1990版《编译技术介绍，使用ANSI C, LeX和YaCC的第一课程》-示例代码，解析理论和设计的完美平衡-它包含了一个用C, LeX和YaCC编写的简单语法的完整编译器

龙书(旧版本)-主要是一个详细的参考功能没有涵盖在前一本书

I think Modern Compiler Implementation in ML is the best introductory compiler writing text. There's a Java version and a C version too, either of which might be more accessible given your languages background. The book packs a lot of useful basic material (scanning and parsing, semantic analysis, activation records, instruction selection, RISC and x86 native code generation) and various "advanced" topics (compiling OO and functional languages, polymorphism, garbage collection, optimization and single static assignment form) into relatively little space (~500 pages).

我更喜欢《现代编译器实现》而不是《Dragon》，因为《现代编译器实现》对该领域的调查较少——相反，它确实涵盖了编写一个严肃、体面的编译器所需的所有主题。在你读完这本书之后，如果你需要的话，你就可以直接深入研究论文了。

I must confess I have a serious soft spot for Niklaus Wirth's Compiler Construction. It is available online as a PDF. I find Wirth's programming aesthetic simply beautiful, however some people find his style too minimal (for example Wirth favors recursive descent parsers, but most CS courses focus on parser generator tools; Wirth's language designs are fairly conservative.) Compiler Construction is a very succinct distillation of Wirth's basic ideas, so whether you like his style or not or not, I highly recommend reading this book.