如果需要比较复杂的对象，则需要在Distinct()方法中传递一个compararer对象。

private void GetDistinctItemList(List<MyListItem> _listWithDuplicates)
{
    //It might be a good idea to create MyListItemComparer 
    //elsewhere and cache it for performance.
    List<MyListItem> _listWithoutDuplicates = _listWithDuplicates.Distinct(new MyListItemComparer()).ToList();
        
    //Choose the line below instead, if you have a situation where there is a chance to change the list while Distinct() is running.
    //ToArray() is used to solve "Collection was modified; enumeration operation may not execute" error.
    //List<MyListItem> _listWithoutDuplicates = _listWithDuplicates.ToArray().Distinct(new MyListItemComparer()).ToList();

    return _listWithoutDuplicates;
}

假设你有另外两个类，比如:

public class MyListItemComparer : IEqualityComparer<MyListItem>
{
    public bool Equals(MyListItem x, MyListItem y)
    {
        return x != null 
               && y != null 
               && x.A == y.A 
               && x.B.Equals(y.B); 
               && x.C.ToString().Equals(y.C.ToString());
    }

    public int GetHashCode(MyListItem codeh)
    {
        return codeh.GetHashCode();
    }
}

And:

public class MyListItem
{
    public int A { get; }
    public string B { get; }
    public MyEnum C { get; }

    public MyListItem(int a, string b, MyEnum c)
    {
        A = a;
        B = b;
        C = c;
    }
}

使用Linq的Union方法。

注意:这个解决方案不需要了解Linq，只需要知道它存在。

Code

首先将以下内容添加到类文件的顶部:

using System.Linq;

现在，你可以使用下面的方法从一个名为obj1的对象中删除重复项:

obj1 = obj1.Union(obj1).ToList();

注意:将obj1重命名为对象的名称。

它是如何工作的

Union命令列出两个源对象的每个条目中的一个。由于obj1都是源对象，这将把obj1减少为每个条目中的一个。 ToList()返回一个新的List。这是必要的，因为像Union这样的Linq命令将结果返回为IEnumerable结果，而不是修改原来的List或返回一个新的List。

扩展方法可能是一种不错的方式……就像这样:

public static List<T> Deduplicate<T>(this List<T> listToDeduplicate)
{
    return listToDeduplicate.Distinct().ToList();
}

然后像这样调用，例如:

List<int> myFilteredList = unfilteredList.Deduplicate();

所有的答案要么复制列表，要么创建一个新列表，要么使用慢函数，要么就是慢得令人痛苦。

据我所知，这是我所知道的最快和最便宜的方法(同时，还得到了一个非常有经验的实时物理优化程序员的支持)。

// Duplicates will be noticed after a sort O(nLogn)
list.Sort();

// Store the current and last items. Current item declaration is not really needed, and probably optimized by the compiler, but in case it's not...
int lastItem = -1;
int currItem = -1;

int size = list.Count;

// Store the index pointing to the last item we want to keep in the list
int last = size - 1;

// Travel the items from last to first O(n)
for (int i = last; i >= 0; --i)
{
    currItem = list[i];

    // If this item was the same as the previous one, we don't want it
    if (currItem == lastItem)
    {
        // Overwrite last in current place. It is a swap but we don't need the last
       list[i] = list[last];

        // Reduce the last index, we don't want that one anymore
        last--;
    }

    // A new item, we store it and continue
    else
        lastItem = currItem;
}

// We now have an unsorted list with the duplicates at the end.

// Remove the last items just once
list.RemoveRange(last + 1, size - last - 1);

// Sort again O(n logn)
list.Sort();

最终成本为:

nlogn + n + nlogn = n + 2nlogn = O(nlogn)非常漂亮。

关于RemoveRange注意事项: 由于我们不能设置列表的计数并避免使用Remove函数，我不知道这个操作的确切速度，但我猜这是最快的方法。

如果需要比较复杂的对象，则需要在Distinct()方法中传递一个compararer对象。

private void GetDistinctItemList(List<MyListItem> _listWithDuplicates)
{
    //It might be a good idea to create MyListItemComparer 
    //elsewhere and cache it for performance.
    List<MyListItem> _listWithoutDuplicates = _listWithDuplicates.Distinct(new MyListItemComparer()).ToList();
        
    //Choose the line below instead, if you have a situation where there is a chance to change the list while Distinct() is running.
    //ToArray() is used to solve "Collection was modified; enumeration operation may not execute" error.
    //List<MyListItem> _listWithoutDuplicates = _listWithDuplicates.ToArray().Distinct(new MyListItemComparer()).ToList();

    return _listWithoutDuplicates;
}

假设你有另外两个类，比如:

public class MyListItemComparer : IEqualityComparer<MyListItem>
{
    public bool Equals(MyListItem x, MyListItem y)
    {
        return x != null 
               && y != null 
               && x.A == y.A 
               && x.B.Equals(y.B); 
               && x.C.ToString().Equals(y.C.ToString());
    }

    public int GetHashCode(MyListItem codeh)
    {
        return codeh.GetHashCode();
    }
}

And:

public class MyListItem
{
    public int A { get; }
    public string B { get; }
    public MyEnum C { get; }

    public MyListItem(int a, string b, MyEnum c)
    {
        A = a;
        B = b;
        C = c;
    }
}

这里有一个简单的解决方案，不需要任何难读的LINQ或任何列表的预先排序。

   private static void CheckForDuplicateItems(List<string> items)
    {
        if (items == null ||
            items.Count == 0)
            return;

        for (int outerIndex = 0; outerIndex < items.Count; outerIndex++)
        {
            for (int innerIndex = 0; innerIndex < items.Count; innerIndex++)
            {
                if (innerIndex == outerIndex) continue;
                if (items[outerIndex].Equals(items[innerIndex]))
                {
                    // Duplicate Found
                }
            }
        }
    }