在我的一次采访中，我被要求解释接口类和抽象类之间的区别。
以下是我的回答:
Methods of a Java interface are implicitly abstract
and cannot have implementations. A Java abstract class can have
instance methods that implements a default behaviour.
Variables declared in a Java interface are by default final. An
abstract class may contain non-final variables.
Members of a Java interface are public by default. A Java abstract
class can have the usual flavours of class members like private,
protected, etc.
A Java interface should be implemented using keyword “implements”; A
Java abstract class should be extended using keyword “extends”.
An interface can extend another Java interface only, an abstract class
can extend another Java class and implement multiple Java interfaces.
A Java class can implement multiple interfaces but it can extend only
one abstract class.
然而，面试官并不满意，他告诉我这种描述代表了“书本知识”。
他让我给出一个更实际的回答，用实际的例子解释我什么时候会选择抽象类而不是接口。
我哪里错了?
我先给大家举个例子:
public interface LoginAuth{
public String encryptPassword(String pass);
public void checkDBforUser();
}
假设您的应用程序中有3个数据库。然后，该数据库的每个实现都需要定义上述2个方法:
public class DBMySQL implements LoginAuth{
// Needs to implement both methods
}
public class DBOracle implements LoginAuth{
// Needs to implement both methods
}
public class DBAbc implements LoginAuth{
// Needs to implement both methods
}
但是，如果encryptPassword()不依赖于数据库，并且对每个类都是相同的呢?那么上面的方法就不是一个好的方法。
相反，考虑以下方法:
public abstract class LoginAuth{
public String encryptPassword(String pass){
// Implement the same default behavior here
// that is shared by all subclasses.
}
// Each subclass needs to provide their own implementation of this only:
public abstract void checkDBforUser();
}
现在，在每个子类中，我们只需要实现一个方法——依赖于数据库的方法。
我相信面试官想要了解的可能是界面和实现之间的区别。
代码模块的接口——不是Java接口，更通用的说法是“接口”——基本上是与使用该接口的客户端代码之间的契约。
代码模块的实现是使模块工作的内部代码。通常，您可以以多种不同的方式实现特定的接口，甚至可以在客户机代码不知道更改的情况下更改实现。
A Java interface should only be used as an interface in the above generic sense, to define how the class behaves for the benefit of client code using the class, without specifying any implementation. Thus, an interface includes method signatures - the names, return types, and argument lists - for methods expected to be called by client code, and in principle should have plenty of Javadoc for each method describing what that method does. The most compelling reason for using an interface is if you plan to have multiple different implementations of the interface, perhaps selecting an implementation depending on deployment configuration.
A Java abstract class, in contrast, provides a partial implementation of the class, rather than having a primary purpose of specifying an interface. It should be used when multiple classes share code, but when the subclasses are also expected to provide part of the implementation. This permits the shared code to appear in only one place - the abstract class - while making it clear that parts of the implementation are not present in the abstract class and are expected to be provided by subclasses.
