有没有一种简单的方法来确定一个点是否在三角形内?是2D的，不是3D的。
当前回答
我在JavaScript中改编的高性能代码(文章如下):
function pointInTriangle (p, p0, p1, p2) {
return (((p1.y - p0.y) * (p.x - p0.x) - (p1.x - p0.x) * (p.y - p0.y)) | ((p2.y - p1.y) * (p.x - p1.x) - (p2.x - p1.x) * (p.y - p1.y)) | ((p0.y - p2.y) * (p.x - p2.x) - (p0.x - p2.x) * (p.y - p2.y))) >= 0;
}
pointInTriangle(p, p0, p1, p2) -用于逆时针方向的三角形 pointInTriangle(p, p0, p1, p2) -用于顺时针三角形
在jsFiddle(包括性能测试)中，在一个单独的函数中也有缠绕检查。或按下面的“运行代码片段”
var ctx = $("canvas")[0].getContext("2d"); var W = 500; var H = 500; var point = { x: W / 2, y: H / 2 }; var triangle = randomTriangle(); $("canvas").click(function(evt) { point.x = evt.pageX - $(this).offset().left; point.y = evt.pageY - $(this).offset().top; test(); }); $("canvas").dblclick(function(evt) { triangle = randomTriangle(); test(); }); document.querySelector('#performance').addEventListener('click', _testPerformance); test(); function test() { var result = checkClockwise(triangle.a, triangle.b, triangle.c) ? pointInTriangle(point, triangle.a, triangle.c, triangle.b) : pointInTriangle(point, triangle.a, triangle.b, triangle.c); var info = "point = (" + point.x + "," + point.y + ")\n"; info += "triangle.a = (" + triangle.a.x + "," + triangle.a.y + ")\n"; info += "triangle.b = (" + triangle.b.x + "," + triangle.b.y + ")\n"; info += "triangle.c = (" + triangle.c.x + "," + triangle.c.y + ")\n"; info += "result = " + (result ? "true" : "false"); $("#result").text(info); render(); } function _testPerformance () { var px = [], py = [], p0x = [], p0y = [], p1x = [], p1y = [], p2x = [], p2y = [], p = [], p0 = [], p1 = [], p2 = []; for(var i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) { p[i] = {x: Math.random() * 100, y: Math.random() * 100}; p0[i] = {x: Math.random() * 100, y: Math.random() * 100}; p1[i] = {x: Math.random() * 100, y: Math.random() * 100}; p2[i] = {x: Math.random() * 100, y: Math.random() * 100}; } console.time('optimal: pointInTriangle'); for(var i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) { pointInTriangle(p[i], p0[i], p1[i], p2[i]); } console.timeEnd('optimal: pointInTriangle'); console.time('original: ptInTriangle'); for(var i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) { ptInTriangle(p[i], p0[i], p1[i], p2[i]); } console.timeEnd('original: ptInTriangle'); } function pointInTriangle (p, p0, p1, p2) { return (((p1.y - p0.y) * (p.x - p0.x) - (p1.x - p0.x) * (p.y - p0.y)) | ((p2.y - p1.y) * (p.x - p1.x) - (p2.x - p1.x) * (p.y - p1.y)) | ((p0.y - p2.y) * (p.x - p2.x) - (p0.x - p2.x) * (p.y - p2.y))) >= 0; } function ptInTriangle(p, p0, p1, p2) { var s = (p0.y * p2.x - p0.x * p2.y + (p2.y - p0.y) * p.x + (p0.x - p2.x) * p.y); var t = (p0.x * p1.y - p0.y * p1.x + (p0.y - p1.y) * p.x + (p1.x - p0.x) * p.y); if (s <= 0 || t <= 0) return false; var A = (-p1.y * p2.x + p0.y * (-p1.x + p2.x) + p0.x * (p1.y - p2.y) + p1.x * p2.y); return (s + t) < A; } function render() { ctx.fillStyle = "#CCC"; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 500, 500); drawTriangle(triangle.a, triangle.b, triangle.c); drawPoint(point); } function checkClockwise(p0, p1, p2) { var A = (-p1.y * p2.x + p0.y * (-p1.x + p2.x) + p0.x * (p1.y - p2.y) + p1.x * p2.y); return A > 0; } function drawTriangle(p0, p1, p2) { ctx.fillStyle = "#999"; ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(p0.x, p0.y); ctx.lineTo(p1.x, p1.y); ctx.lineTo(p2.x, p2.y); ctx.closePath(); ctx.fill(); ctx.fillStyle = "#000"; ctx.font = "12px monospace"; ctx.fillText("1", p0.x, p0.y); ctx.fillText("2", p1.x, p1.y); ctx.fillText("3", p2.x, p2.y); } function drawPoint(p) { ctx.fillStyle = "#F00"; ctx.beginPath(); ctx.arc(p.x, p.y, 5, 0, 2 * Math.PI); ctx.fill(); } function rand(min, max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min + 1)) + min; } function randomTriangle() { return { a: { x: rand(0, W), y: rand(0, H) }, b: { x: rand(0, W), y: rand(0, H) }, c: { x: rand(0, W), y: rand(0, H) } }; } <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <button id="performance">Run performance test (open console)</button> <pre>Click: place the point. Double click: random triangle.</pre> <pre id="result"></pre> <canvas width="500" height="500"></canvas>
受此启发: http://www.phatcode.net/articles.php?id=459
其他回答
If you know the co-ordinates of the three vertices and the co-ordinates of the specific point, then you can get the area of the complete triangle. Afterwards, calculate the area of the three triangle segments (one point being the point given and the other two being any two vertices of the triangle). Thus, you will get the area of the three triangle segments. If the sum of these areas are equal to the total area (that you got previously), then, the point should be inside the triangle. Otherwise, the point is not inside the triangle. This should work. If there are any issues, let me know. Thank you.
由andreasdr和Perro Azul发布的重心方法的c#版本。我添加了一个检查，当s和t有相反的符号(而且都不为零)时，放弃面积计算，因为潜在地避免三分之一的乘法成本似乎是合理的。
public static bool PointInTriangle(Point p, Point p0, Point p1, Point p2)
{
var s = (p0.X - p2.X) * (p.Y - p2.Y) - (p0.Y - p2.Y) * (p.X - p2.X);
var t = (p1.X - p0.X) * (p.Y - p0.Y) - (p1.Y - p0.Y) * (p.X - p0.X);
if ((s < 0) != (t < 0) && s != 0 && t != 0)
return false;
var d = (p2.X - p1.X) * (p.Y - p1.Y) - (p2.Y - p1.Y) * (p.X - p1.X);
return d == 0 || (d < 0) == (s + t <= 0);
}
2021年更新:这个版本正确处理任意一个缠绕方向(顺时针和逆时针)指定的三角形。请注意，对于恰好位于三角形边缘上的点，本页上的一些其他答案会给出不一致的结果，这取决于三角形三个点的排列顺序。这些点被认为是“在”三角形中，这段代码正确地返回true，而不管缠绕方向如何。
下面是一个python解决方案，它是高效的，文档化的，包含三个单元测试。它具有专业级的质量，并且可以以模块的形式放入您的项目中。
import unittest
###############################################################################
def point_in_triangle(point, triangle):
"""Returns True if the point is inside the triangle
and returns False if it falls outside.
- The argument *point* is a tuple with two elements
containing the X,Y coordinates respectively.
- The argument *triangle* is a tuple with three elements each
element consisting of a tuple of X,Y coordinates.
It works like this:
Walk clockwise or counterclockwise around the triangle
and project the point onto the segment we are crossing
by using the dot product.
Finally, check that the vector created is on the same side
for each of the triangle's segments.
"""
# Unpack arguments
x, y = point
ax, ay = triangle[0]
bx, by = triangle[1]
cx, cy = triangle[2]
# Segment A to B
side_1 = (x - bx) * (ay - by) - (ax - bx) * (y - by)
# Segment B to C
side_2 = (x - cx) * (by - cy) - (bx - cx) * (y - cy)
# Segment C to A
side_3 = (x - ax) * (cy - ay) - (cx - ax) * (y - ay)
# All the signs must be positive or all negative
return (side_1 < 0.0) == (side_2 < 0.0) == (side_3 < 0.0)
###############################################################################
class TestPointInTriangle(unittest.TestCase):
triangle = ((22 , 8),
(12 , 55),
(7 , 19))
def test_inside(self):
point = (15, 20)
self.assertTrue(point_in_triangle(point, self.triangle))
def test_outside(self):
point = (1, 7)
self.assertFalse(point_in_triangle(point, self.triangle))
def test_border_case(self):
"""If the point is exactly on one of the triangle's edges,
we consider it is inside."""
point = (7, 19)
self.assertTrue(point_in_triangle(point, self.triangle))
###############################################################################
if __name__ == "__main__":
suite = unittest.defaultTestLoader.loadTestsFromTestCase(TestPointInTriangle)
unittest.TextTestRunner().run(suite)
上面的算法有一个额外的可选图形测试，以确认其有效性:
import random
from matplotlib import pyplot
from triangle_test import point_in_triangle
###############################################################################
# The area #
size_x = 64
size_y = 64
# The triangle #
triangle = ((22 , 8),
(12 , 55),
(7 , 19))
# Number of random points #
count_points = 10000
# Prepare the figure #
figure = pyplot.figure()
axes = figure.add_subplot(111, aspect='equal')
axes.set_title("Test the 'point_in_triangle' function")
axes.set_xlim(0, size_x)
axes.set_ylim(0, size_y)
# Plot the triangle #
from matplotlib.patches import Polygon
axes.add_patch(Polygon(triangle, linewidth=1, edgecolor='k', facecolor='none'))
# Plot the points #
for i in range(count_points):
x = random.uniform(0, size_x)
y = random.uniform(0, size_y)
if point_in_triangle((x,y), triangle): pyplot.plot(x, y, '.g')
else: pyplot.plot(x, y, '.b')
# Save it #
figure.savefig("point_in_triangle.pdf")
制作以下图表:
我在最后一次尝试谷歌和找到这个页面之前写了这段代码，所以我想我应该分享它。它基本上是Kisielewicz答案的优化版本。我也研究了重心法，但从维基百科的文章来看，我很难看出它是如何更有效的(我猜有一些更深层次的等价性)。不管怎样，这个算法的优点是不用除法;一个潜在的问题是边缘检测的行为取决于方向。
bool intpoint_inside_trigon(intPoint s, intPoint a, intPoint b, intPoint c)
{
int as_x = s.x - a.x;
int as_y = s.y - a.y;
bool s_ab = (b.x - a.x) * as_y - (b.y - a.y) * as_x > 0;
if ((c.x - a.x) * as_y - (c.y - a.y) * as_x > 0 == s_ab)
return false;
if ((c.x - b.x) * (s.y - b.y) - (c.y - b.y)*(s.x - b.x) > 0 != s_ab)
return false;
return true;
}
换句话说，思想是这样的:点s是在直线AB和直线AC的左边还是右边?如果是真的，它就不可能在里面。如果为假，则至少在“锥”内满足条件。现在，因为我们知道三角形(三角形)内的一个点必须与BC(以及CA)在AB的同一侧，我们检查它们是否不同。如果有，s就不可能在里面，否则s一定在里面。
计算中的一些关键字是线半平面和行列式(2x2叉乘)。也许一个更有教学意义的方法是将它看作是一个在AB、BC和CA的同一侧(左或右)的点。然而，上面的方法似乎更适合进行一些优化。
我只是想用一些简单的向量数学来解释安德里亚斯给出的重心坐标解，它会更容易理解。
区域A定义为s * v02 + t * v01给出的任意向量，条件s >= 0, t >= 0。如果三角形v0 v1 v2内的任意一点，它一定在区域A内。
如果进一步限制s, t属于[0,1]。得到包含s * v02 + t * v01的所有向量的区域B，条件s, t属于[0,1]。值得注意的是，区域B的下部是三角形v0, v1, v2的镜像。问题来了，我们是否可以给定一定的s和t条件，来进一步排除区域B的低部分。
假设我们给出一个值s, t在[0,1]内变化。在下图中，点p位于v1v2的边缘。s * v02 + t * v01的所有向量沿着虚线通过简单向量和得到。在v1v2和虚线交点p处，我们有:
（1-S）|V0v2|/ |v0v2|= tp|v0v1|/ |v0v1|
得到1 - s = tp，然后1 = s + tp。如果任意t > tp，即1 < s + t where在双虚线上，则该向量在三角形外，任意t <= tp，即1 >= s + t where在单虚线上，则该向量在三角形内。
如果我们给出[0,1]中的任意s，对应的t必须满足1 >= s + t，对于三角形内的向量。
最后我们得到v = s * v02 +t * v01, v在三角形内，条件s, t, s+t属于[0,1]。然后翻译到点，我们有
P - p0 = s * (p1 - p0) + t * (p2 - p0)， and s, t, s + t in [0,1]
和Andreas解方程组的解是一样的 P = p0 + s * (p1 - p0) + t * (p2 - p0)，带s, t, s + t属于[0,1]。
