有没有一种简单的方法来确定一个点是否在三角形内?是2D的,不是3D的。
当前回答
由andreasdr和Perro Azul发布的重心方法的c#版本。我添加了一个检查,当s和t有相反的符号(而且都不为零)时,放弃面积计算,因为潜在地避免三分之一的乘法成本似乎是合理的。
public static bool PointInTriangle(Point p, Point p0, Point p1, Point p2)
{
var s = (p0.X - p2.X) * (p.Y - p2.Y) - (p0.Y - p2.Y) * (p.X - p2.X);
var t = (p1.X - p0.X) * (p.Y - p0.Y) - (p1.Y - p0.Y) * (p.X - p0.X);
if ((s < 0) != (t < 0) && s != 0 && t != 0)
return false;
var d = (p2.X - p1.X) * (p.Y - p1.Y) - (p2.Y - p1.Y) * (p.X - p1.X);
return d == 0 || (d < 0) == (s + t <= 0);
}
2021年更新:这个版本正确处理任意一个缠绕方向(顺时针和逆时针)指定的三角形。请注意,对于恰好位于三角形边缘上的点,本页上的一些其他答案会给出不一致的结果,这取决于三角形三个点的排列顺序。这些点被认为是“在”三角形中,这段代码正确地返回true,而不管缠绕方向如何。
其他回答
其中一个最简单的方法来检查是否由三角形的顶点组成的面积 (x1,y1) (x2,y2) (x3,y3)是否为正。
面积可由公式计算:
1/2 [x1(y2–y3) + x2(y3–y1) + x3(y1–y2)]
或者python代码可以写成:
def triangleornot(p1,p2,p3):
return (1/ 2) [p1[0](p2[1]–p3[1]) + p2[0] (p3[1]–p1[1]) + p3[0] (p1[0]–p2[0])]
下面是一个python解决方案,它是高效的,文档化的,包含三个单元测试。它具有专业级的质量,并且可以以模块的形式放入您的项目中。
import unittest
###############################################################################
def point_in_triangle(point, triangle):
"""Returns True if the point is inside the triangle
and returns False if it falls outside.
- The argument *point* is a tuple with two elements
containing the X,Y coordinates respectively.
- The argument *triangle* is a tuple with three elements each
element consisting of a tuple of X,Y coordinates.
It works like this:
Walk clockwise or counterclockwise around the triangle
and project the point onto the segment we are crossing
by using the dot product.
Finally, check that the vector created is on the same side
for each of the triangle's segments.
"""
# Unpack arguments
x, y = point
ax, ay = triangle[0]
bx, by = triangle[1]
cx, cy = triangle[2]
# Segment A to B
side_1 = (x - bx) * (ay - by) - (ax - bx) * (y - by)
# Segment B to C
side_2 = (x - cx) * (by - cy) - (bx - cx) * (y - cy)
# Segment C to A
side_3 = (x - ax) * (cy - ay) - (cx - ax) * (y - ay)
# All the signs must be positive or all negative
return (side_1 < 0.0) == (side_2 < 0.0) == (side_3 < 0.0)
###############################################################################
class TestPointInTriangle(unittest.TestCase):
triangle = ((22 , 8),
(12 , 55),
(7 , 19))
def test_inside(self):
point = (15, 20)
self.assertTrue(point_in_triangle(point, self.triangle))
def test_outside(self):
point = (1, 7)
self.assertFalse(point_in_triangle(point, self.triangle))
def test_border_case(self):
"""If the point is exactly on one of the triangle's edges,
we consider it is inside."""
point = (7, 19)
self.assertTrue(point_in_triangle(point, self.triangle))
###############################################################################
if __name__ == "__main__":
suite = unittest.defaultTestLoader.loadTestsFromTestCase(TestPointInTriangle)
unittest.TextTestRunner().run(suite)
上面的算法有一个额外的可选图形测试,以确认其有效性:
import random
from matplotlib import pyplot
from triangle_test import point_in_triangle
###############################################################################
# The area #
size_x = 64
size_y = 64
# The triangle #
triangle = ((22 , 8),
(12 , 55),
(7 , 19))
# Number of random points #
count_points = 10000
# Prepare the figure #
figure = pyplot.figure()
axes = figure.add_subplot(111, aspect='equal')
axes.set_title("Test the 'point_in_triangle' function")
axes.set_xlim(0, size_x)
axes.set_ylim(0, size_y)
# Plot the triangle #
from matplotlib.patches import Polygon
axes.add_patch(Polygon(triangle, linewidth=1, edgecolor='k', facecolor='none'))
# Plot the points #
for i in range(count_points):
x = random.uniform(0, size_x)
y = random.uniform(0, size_y)
if point_in_triangle((x,y), triangle): pyplot.plot(x, y, '.g')
else: pyplot.plot(x, y, '.b')
# Save it #
figure.savefig("point_in_triangle.pdf")
制作以下图表:
由andreasdr和Perro Azul发布的重心方法的c#版本。我添加了一个检查,当s和t有相反的符号(而且都不为零)时,放弃面积计算,因为潜在地避免三分之一的乘法成本似乎是合理的。
public static bool PointInTriangle(Point p, Point p0, Point p1, Point p2)
{
var s = (p0.X - p2.X) * (p.Y - p2.Y) - (p0.Y - p2.Y) * (p.X - p2.X);
var t = (p1.X - p0.X) * (p.Y - p0.Y) - (p1.Y - p0.Y) * (p.X - p0.X);
if ((s < 0) != (t < 0) && s != 0 && t != 0)
return false;
var d = (p2.X - p1.X) * (p.Y - p1.Y) - (p2.Y - p1.Y) * (p.X - p1.X);
return d == 0 || (d < 0) == (s + t <= 0);
}
2021年更新:这个版本正确处理任意一个缠绕方向(顺时针和逆时针)指定的三角形。请注意,对于恰好位于三角形边缘上的点,本页上的一些其他答案会给出不一致的结果,这取决于三角形三个点的排列顺序。这些点被认为是“在”三角形中,这段代码正确地返回true,而不管缠绕方向如何。
bool point2Dtriangle(double e,double f, double a,double b,double c, double g,double h,double i, double v, double w){
/* inputs: e=point.x, f=point.y
a=triangle.Ax, b=triangle.Bx, c=triangle.Cx
g=triangle.Ay, h=triangle.By, i=triangle.Cy */
v = 1 - (f * (b - c) + h * (c - e) + i * (e - b)) / (g * (b - c) + h * (c - a) + i * (a - b));
w = (f * (a - b) + g * (b - e) + h * (e - a)) / (g * (b - c) + h * (c - a) + i * (a - b));
if (*v > -0.0 && *v < 1.0000001 && *w > -0.0 && *w < *v) return true;//is inside
else return false;//is outside
return 0;
}
从质心转换而来的几乎完美的笛卡尔坐标 在*v (x)和*w (y)双精度内导出。 在每种情况下,两个导出双精度对象前面都应该有一个*字符,可能是*v和*w 代码也可以用于四边形的另一个三角形。 特此签名只写三角形abc从顺时针abcd的四边形。
A---B
|..\\.o|
|....\\.|
D---C
o点在ABC三角形内 对于带有第二个三角形的测试,将此函数称为CDA方向,*v=1-*v后的结果应正确;* w = 1 - * w;为了四合院
通过使用重心坐标的解析解(由Andreas Brinck指出)和:
不是把乘法分布在括号里的项上 通过存储相同的项来避免多次计算 还原比较(如coproc和Thomas Eding所指出的)
可以最小化“昂贵”操作的数量:
function ptInTriangle(p, p0, p1, p2) {
var dX = p.x-p2.x;
var dY = p.y-p2.y;
var dX21 = p2.x-p1.x;
var dY12 = p1.y-p2.y;
var D = dY12*(p0.x-p2.x) + dX21*(p0.y-p2.y);
var s = dY12*dX + dX21*dY;
var t = (p2.y-p0.y)*dX + (p0.x-p2.x)*dY;
if (D<0) return s<=0 && t<=0 && s+t>=D;
return s>=0 && t>=0 && s+t<=D;
}
代码可以粘贴在Perro Azul jsfiddle中,或者通过点击下面的“运行代码片段”来尝试
var ctx = $("canvas")[0].getContext("2d"); var W = 500; var H = 500; var point = { x: W / 2, y: H / 2 }; var triangle = randomTriangle(); $("canvas").click(function(evt) { point.x = evt.pageX - $(this).offset().left; point.y = evt.pageY - $(this).offset().top; test(); }); $("canvas").dblclick(function(evt) { triangle = randomTriangle(); test(); }); test(); function test() { var result = ptInTriangle(point, triangle.a, triangle.b, triangle.c); var info = "point = (" + point.x + "," + point.y + ")\n"; info += "triangle.a = (" + triangle.a.x + "," + triangle.a.y + ")\n"; info += "triangle.b = (" + triangle.b.x + "," + triangle.b.y + ")\n"; info += "triangle.c = (" + triangle.c.x + "," + triangle.c.y + ")\n"; info += "result = " + (result ? "true" : "false"); $("#result").text(info); render(); } function ptInTriangle(p, p0, p1, p2) { var A = 1/2 * (-p1.y * p2.x + p0.y * (-p1.x + p2.x) + p0.x * (p1.y - p2.y) + p1.x * p2.y); var sign = A < 0 ? -1 : 1; var s = (p0.y * p2.x - p0.x * p2.y + (p2.y - p0.y) * p.x + (p0.x - p2.x) * p.y) * sign; var t = (p0.x * p1.y - p0.y * p1.x + (p0.y - p1.y) * p.x + (p1.x - p0.x) * p.y) * sign; return s > 0 && t > 0 && (s + t) < 2 * A * sign; } function render() { ctx.fillStyle = "#CCC"; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 500, 500); drawTriangle(triangle.a, triangle.b, triangle.c); drawPoint(point); } function drawTriangle(p0, p1, p2) { ctx.fillStyle = "#999"; ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(p0.x, p0.y); ctx.lineTo(p1.x, p1.y); ctx.lineTo(p2.x, p2.y); ctx.closePath(); ctx.fill(); ctx.fillStyle = "#000"; ctx.font = "12px monospace"; ctx.fillText("1", p0.x, p0.y); ctx.fillText("2", p1.x, p1.y); ctx.fillText("3", p2.x, p2.y); } function drawPoint(p) { ctx.fillStyle = "#F00"; ctx.beginPath(); ctx.arc(p.x, p.y, 5, 0, 2 * Math.PI); ctx.fill(); } function rand(min, max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min + 1)) + min; } function randomTriangle() { return { a: { x: rand(0, W), y: rand(0, H) }, b: { x: rand(0, W), y: rand(0, H) }, c: { x: rand(0, W), y: rand(0, H) } }; } <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <pre>Click: place the point. Double click: random triangle.</pre> <pre id="result"></pre> <canvas width="500" height="500"></canvas>
导致:
变量“召回”:30 可变存储:7 补充:4 减法:8 乘法:6 部门:没有 比较:4
这与Kornel Kisielewicz解决方案(25次召回,1次存储,15次减法,6次乘法,5次比较)相比非常好,如果需要顺时针/逆时针检测(它本身需要6次召回,1次加法,2次减法,2次乘法和1次比较,使用解析解行列式,如rhgb所指出的),可能会更好。