从nullptr:一个类型安全和明确的空指针:

新的c++ 09 nullptr关键字指定了一个右值常量，用作通用空指针字面量，取代了有bug且弱类型的字面量0和臭名昭著的null宏。因此，Nullptr结束了30多年来的尴尬、歧义和错误。下面几节介绍nullptr功能，并展示它如何补救NULL和0的问题。

其他参考资料:

WikiBooks，带有示例代码。 Stack Overflow:在c++中，指针使用NULL还是0(零)? 模板 谷歌组:comp.lang.c++。有节制的编译器讨论

让我首先给您一个简单的nullptr_t的实现

struct nullptr_t 
{
    void operator&() const = delete;  // Can't take address of nullptr

    template<class T>
    inline operator T*() const { return 0; }

    template<class C, class T>
    inline operator T C::*() const { return 0; }
};

nullptr_t nullptr;

nullptr是返回类型解析器习惯用法的一个微妙示例，它根据分配给实例的类型自动推导出正确类型的空指针。

int *ptr = nullptr;                // OK
void (C::*method_ptr)() = nullptr; // OK

如上所述，当nullptr被赋值给整数指针时，将创建模板化转换函数的int类型实例化。方法指针也是一样。 通过这种方式利用模板功能，我们实际上每次都创建了适当类型的空指针，这是一个新的类型赋值。 因为nullptr是一个值为0的整型字面值，你不能使用它的地址，这是我们通过删除&操作符实现的。

为什么我们首先需要nullptr ?

你可以看到传统的NULL有一些问题，如下:

1️⃣隐式转换

char *str = NULL; // Implicit conversion from void * to char *
int i = NULL;     // OK, but `i` is not pointer type

2️⃣函数调用歧义

void func(int) {}
void func(int*){}
void func(bool){}

func(NULL);     // Which one to call?

编译会产生以下错误:

error: call to 'func' is ambiguous
    func(NULL);
    ^~~~
note: candidate function void func(bool){}
                              ^
note: candidate function void func(int*){}
                              ^
note: candidate function void func(int){}
                              ^
1 error generated.
compiler exit status 1

3️⃣构造函数重载

struct String
{
    String(uint32_t)    {   /* size of string */    }
    String(const char*) {       /* string */        }
};

String s1( NULL );
String s2( 5 );

在这种情况下，需要显式强制转换(即String s((char*)0))。

0 used to be the only integer value that could be used as a cast-free initializer for pointers: you can not initialize pointers with other integer values without a cast. You can consider 0 as a consexpr singleton syntactically similar to an integer literal. It can initiate any pointer or integer. But surprisingly, you'll find that it has no distinct type: it is an int. So how come 0 can initialize pointers and 1 cannot? A practical answer was we need a means of defining pointer null value and direct implicit conversion of int to a pointer is error-prone. Thus 0 became a real freak weirdo beast out of the prehistoric era. nullptr was proposed to be a real singleton constexpr representation of null value to initialize pointers. It can not be used to directly initialize integers and eliminates ambiguities involved with defining NULL in terms of 0. nullptr could be defined as a library using std syntax but semantically looked to be a missing core component. NULL is now deprecated in favor of nullptr, unless some library decides to define it as nullptr.

为什么在c++ 11中使用nullptr ?是什么?为什么NULL是不充分的?

c++专家Alex Allain在这里说得很好(我用粗体加了重点):

...imagine you have the following two function declarations: void func(int n); void func(char *s); func( NULL ); // guess which function gets called? Although it looks like the second function will be called--you are, after all, passing in what seems to be a pointer--it's really the first function that will be called! The trouble is that because NULL is 0, and 0 is an integer, the first version of func will be called instead. This is the kind of thing that, yes, doesn't happen all the time, but when it does happen, is extremely frustrating and confusing. If you didn't know the details of what is going on, it might well look like a compiler bug. A language feature that looks like a compiler bug is, well, not something you want. Enter nullptr. In C++11, nullptr is a new keyword that can (and should!) be used to represent NULL pointers; in other words, wherever you were writing NULL before, you should use nullptr instead. It's no more clear to you, the programmer, (everyone knows what NULL means), but it's more explicit to the compiler, which will no longer see 0s everywhere being used to have special meaning when used as a pointer.

Allain在文章结尾写道:

不管这些——c++ 11的经验法则是，只要在过去使用NULL，就开始使用nullptr。

(我的话):

最后，不要忘记nullptr是一个对象——一个类。它可以在任何之前使用NULL的地方使用，但如果你因为某种原因需要它的类型，它的类型可以用decltype(nullptr)提取，或者直接描述为std::nullptr_t，这只是一个decltype(nullptr)的类型定义，如下所示:

定义在头<cstddef>:

See:

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/nullptr_t 和https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/header/cstddef

namespace std
{
typedef decltype(nullptr) nullptr_t; // (since C++11)
// OR (same thing, but using the C++ keyword `using` instead of the C and C++ 
// keyword `typedef`):
using nullptr_t = decltype(nullptr); // (since C++11)
} // namespace std

引用:

c++ 11中更好的类型- nullptr，枚举类(强类型枚举)和cstdint https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/decltype https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/nullptr_t https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/header/cstddef https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/keyword/using https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/keyword/typedef

Nullptr不能赋值给整型类型，比如int型，只能赋值给指针类型;内置指针类型，如int *ptr或智能指针，如std::shared_ptr<T>

我相信这是一个重要的区别，因为NULL仍然可以被赋给整型和指针，因为NULL是一个扩展到0的宏，可以作为int的初始值以及指针。

其他语言有保留词，它们是类型的实例。例如，Python:

>>> None = 5
  File "<stdin>", line 1
SyntaxError: assignment to None
>>> type(None)
<type 'NoneType'>

这实际上是一个相当接近的比较，因为None通常用于尚未初始化的东西，但与此同时，像None == 0这样的比较是假的。

另一方面，在普通C中，NULL == 0将返回真IIRC，因为NULL只是一个返回0的宏，这总是一个无效地址(AFAIK)。