多年来，我一直在使用这个函数来美化我的重载:

function overload(){
  const fs = arguments, fallback = fs[fs.length - 1];
  return function(){
    const f = fs[arguments.length] || (arguments.length >= fs.length ? fallback : null);
    return f.apply(this, arguments);
  }
}

型:

function curry1(f){
  return curry2(f, f.length);
}

function curry2(f, minimum){
  return function(...applied){
    if (applied.length >= minimum) {
      return f.apply(this, applied);
    } else {
      return curry2(function(...args){
        return f.apply(this, applied.concat(args));
      }, minimum - applied.length);
    }
  }
}

export const curry = overload(null, curry1, curry2);

看看jQuery的off方法:

  function off( types, selector, fn ) {
    var handleObj, type;
    if ( types && types.preventDefault && types.handleObj ) {

        // ( event )  dispatched jQuery.Event
        handleObj = types.handleObj;
        jQuery( types.delegateTarget ).off(
            handleObj.namespace ?
                handleObj.origType + "." + handleObj.namespace :
                handleObj.origType,
            handleObj.selector,
            handleObj.handler
        );
        return this;
    }
    if ( typeof types === "object" ) {

        // ( types-object [, selector] )
        for ( type in types ) {
            this.off( type, selector, types[ type ] );
        }
        return this;
    }
    if ( selector === false || typeof selector === "function" ) {

        // ( types [, fn] )
        fn = selector;
        selector = undefined;
    }
    if ( fn === false ) {
        fn = returnFalse;
    }
    return this.each( function() {
        jQuery.event.remove( this, types, fn, selector );
    } );
  }

许多重载函数在优化性能时几乎不可读。你必须破译函数的头部。这可能比使用我提供的重载函数更快;但是，从人的角度来看，它在识别调用了哪个重载方面要慢一些。

我喜欢@AntouanK的方法。我经常发现自己提供了一个具有不同数量参数和不同类型的函数。有时他们不服从命令。我用来映射查找参数类型:

findUDPServers: function(socketProperties, success, error) {
    var fqnMap = [];

    fqnMap['undefined'] = fqnMap['function'] = function(success, error) {
        var socketProperties = {name:'HELLO_SERVER'};

        this.searchServers(socketProperties, success, error);
    };

    fqnMap['object'] = function(socketProperties, success, error) {
        var _socketProperties = _.merge({name:'HELLO_SERVER'}, socketProperties || {});

        this.searchServers(_socketProperties, success, error);
    };

    fqnMap[typeof arguments[0]].apply(this, arguments);
}

#转发模式=> JS重载的最佳实践 转到另一个函数，它的名字是由第3和第4点构建的:

使用参数数量 检查参数类型

window['foo_'+arguments.length+'_'+Array.from(arguments).map((arg)=>typeof arg).join('_')](...arguments)

#应用于您的案例:

 function foo(...args){
          return window['foo_' + args.length+'_'+Array.from(args).map((arg)=>typeof arg).join('_')](...args);

  }
   //------Assuming that `x` , `y` and `z` are String when calling `foo` . 
  
  /**-- for :  foo(x)*/
  function foo_1_string(){
  }
  /**-- for : foo(x,y,z) ---*/
  function foo_3_string_string_string(){
      
  }

#其他复杂样本:

      function foo(...args){
          return window['foo_'+args.length+'_'+Array.from(args).map((arg)=>typeof arg).join('_')](...args);
       }

        /** one argument & this argument is string */
      function foo_1_string(){

      }
       //------------
       /** one argument & this argument is object */
      function foo_1_object(){

      }
      //----------
      /** two arguments & those arguments are both string */
      function foo_2_string_string(){

      }
       //--------
      /** Three arguments & those arguments are : id(number),name(string), callback(function) */
      function foo_3_number_string_function(){
                let args=arguments;
                  new Person(args[0],args[1]).onReady(args[3]);
      }
     
       //--- And so on ....   

最好的方法取决于函数和参数。你的每个选择在不同的情况下都是一个好主意。我通常按照以下顺序尝试这些方法，直到其中一个有效为止:

Using optional arguments like y = y || 'default'. This is convenient if you can do it, but it may not always work practically, e.g. when 0/null/undefined would be a valid argument. Using number of arguments. Similar to the last option but may work when #1 doesn't work. Checking types of arguments. This can work in some cases where the number of arguments is the same. If you can't reliably determine the types, you may need to use different names. Using different names in the first place. You may need to do this if the other options won't work, aren't practical, or for consistency with other related functions.

看看这个。它很酷。 http://ejohn.org/blog/javascript-method-overloading/ 技巧Javascript，让你做这样的调用:

var users = new Users();
users.find(); // Finds all
users.find("John"); // Finds users by name
users.find("John", "Resig"); // Finds users by first and last name

有两种方法可以更好地解决这个问题:

如果您希望保留很大的灵活性，则传递一个字典(关联数组) 将一个对象作为参数，并使用基于原型的继承来增加灵活性。