多年来，我一直在使用这个函数来美化我的重载:

function overload(){
  const fs = arguments, fallback = fs[fs.length - 1];
  return function(){
    const f = fs[arguments.length] || (arguments.length >= fs.length ? fallback : null);
    return f.apply(this, arguments);
  }
}

型:

function curry1(f){
  return curry2(f, f.length);
}

function curry2(f, minimum){
  return function(...applied){
    if (applied.length >= minimum) {
      return f.apply(this, applied);
    } else {
      return curry2(function(...args){
        return f.apply(this, applied.concat(args));
      }, minimum - applied.length);
    }
  }
}

export const curry = overload(null, curry1, curry2);

看看jQuery的off方法:

  function off( types, selector, fn ) {
    var handleObj, type;
    if ( types && types.preventDefault && types.handleObj ) {

        // ( event )  dispatched jQuery.Event
        handleObj = types.handleObj;
        jQuery( types.delegateTarget ).off(
            handleObj.namespace ?
                handleObj.origType + "." + handleObj.namespace :
                handleObj.origType,
            handleObj.selector,
            handleObj.handler
        );
        return this;
    }
    if ( typeof types === "object" ) {

        // ( types-object [, selector] )
        for ( type in types ) {
            this.off( type, selector, types[ type ] );
        }
        return this;
    }
    if ( selector === false || typeof selector === "function" ) {

        // ( types [, fn] )
        fn = selector;
        selector = undefined;
    }
    if ( fn === false ) {
        fn = returnFalse;
    }
    return this.each( function() {
        jQuery.event.remove( this, types, fn, selector );
    } );
  }

许多重载函数在优化性能时几乎不可读。你必须破译函数的头部。这可能比使用我提供的重载函数更快;但是，从人的角度来看，它在识别调用了哪个重载方面要慢一些。

看看这个。它很酷。 http://ejohn.org/blog/javascript-method-overloading/ 技巧Javascript，让你做这样的调用:

var users = new Users();
users.find(); // Finds all
users.find("John"); // Finds users by name
users.find("John", "Resig"); // Finds users by first and last name

我们用over.js来解决这个问题是一种非常优雅的方式。你可以:

var obj = {

  /**
   * Says something in the console.
   *
   * say(msg) - Says something once.
   * say(msg, times) - Says something many times.
   */
  say: Over(
    function(msg$string){
      console.info(msg$string);
    },
    function(msg$string, times$number){
      for (var i = 0; i < times$number; i++) this.say(msg$string);
    }
  )

};

正确答案是JAVASCRIPT中没有重载。

检查/切换内部的功能不是过载。

超载的概念: 在某些编程语言中，函数重载或方法重载是用不同的实现创建多个同名方法的能力。对重载函数的调用将运行该函数的特定实现，适用于调用的上下文，允许一个函数调用根据上下文执行不同的任务。

例如，doTask()和doTask(object O)是重载方法。要调用后者，必须将对象作为参数传递，而前者不需要参数，并且使用空参数字段调用。一个常见的错误是将默认值赋给第二个方法中的对象，这将导致一个模糊的调用错误，因为编译器不知道使用两个方法中的哪一个。

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_overloading

所有建议的实现都很棒，但说实话，JavaScript没有原生实现。

我想分享一个类似重载方法的有用示例。

function Clear(control)
{
  var o = typeof control !== "undefined" ? control : document.body;
  var children = o.childNodes;
  while (o.childNodes.length > 0)
    o.removeChild(o.firstChild);
}

用法: 明确的();//清除所有文件

明确(myDiv);//清除myDiv引用的面板

我经常这样做:

C#:

public string CatStrings(string p1)                  {return p1;}
public string CatStrings(string p1, int p2)          {return p1+p2.ToString();}
public string CatStrings(string p1, int p2, bool p3) {return p1+p2.ToString()+p3.ToString();}

CatStrings("one");        // result = one
CatStrings("one",2);      // result = one2
CatStrings("one",2,true); // result = one2true

JavaScript相当于:

function CatStrings(p1, p2, p3)
{
  var s = p1;
  if(typeof p2 !== "undefined") {s += p2;}
  if(typeof p3 !== "undefined") {s += p3;}
  return s;
};

CatStrings("one");        // result = one
CatStrings("one",2);      // result = one2
CatStrings("one",2,true); // result = one2true

This particular example is actually more elegant in javascript than C#. Parameters which are not specified are 'undefined' in javascript, which evaluates to false in an if statement. However, the function definition does not convey the information that p2 and p3 are optional. If you need a lot of overloading, jQuery has decided to use an object as the parameter, for example, jQuery.ajax(options). I agree with them that this is the most powerful and clearly documentable approach to overloading, but I rarely need more than one or two quick optional parameters.

编辑:根据Ian的建议更改IF测试