是的……我们的数据库是在ERwin中设计的，每个版本的ddl是自动生成的。ERwin文件保存在我们的源代码控制系统中(实际上，我们的工程文档也是如此)。

这对我来说也一直是一个很大的烦恼——似乎对开发数据库进行快速更改，保存它(忘记保存更改脚本)太容易了，然后你就卡在那里了。您可以撤消刚才所做的并重新做它以创建更改脚本，当然，如果您愿意的话，也可以从头开始编写它，尽管这将花费大量的时间来编写脚本。

A tool that I have used in the past that has helped with this some is SQL Delta. It will show you the differences between two databases (SQL server/Oracle I believe) and generate all the change scripts necessary to migrate A->B. Another nice thing it does is show all the differences between database content between the production (or test) DB and your development DB. Since more and more apps store configuration and state that is crucial to their execution in database tables, it can be a real pain to have change scripts that remove, add, and alter the proper rows. SQL Delta shows the rows in the database just like they would look in a Diff tool - changed, added, deleted.

一个很好的工具。以下是链接: http://www.sqldelta.com/

“简短版本:将您的生产数据库转储到git存储库中，以实现即时备份解决方案。”

是的……我们的数据库是在ERwin中设计的，每个版本的ddl是自动生成的。ERwin文件保存在我们的源代码控制系统中(实际上，我们的工程文档也是如此)。

我们使用复制和集群来管理数据库以及备份。我们使用Serena来管理SQL脚本和配置实现。在进行配置更改之前，我们将执行备份，作为更改管理流程的一部分。此备份满足我们的回滚需求。

我认为这完全取决于规模。您是在谈论需要离线备份和灾难恢复的企业应用程序吗?一个运行会计应用程序的小工作组?还是两者之间的任何地方?

The most successful scheme I've ever used on a project has combined backups and differential SQL files. Basically we would take a backup of our db after every release and do an SQL dump so that we could create a blank schema from scratch if we needed to as well. Then anytime you needed to make a change to the DB you would add an alter scrip to the sql directory under version control. We would always prefix a sequence number or date to the file name so the first change would be something like 01_add_created_on_column.sql, and the next script would be 02_added_customers_index. Our CI machine would check for these and run them sequentially on a fresh copy of the db that had been restored from the backup.

我们还准备了一些脚本，开发人员可以用一个命令将本地db重新初始化到当前版本。