给定以下代码(不起作用):

while True:
    # Snip: print out current state
    while True:
        ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
        if ok.lower() == "y": break 2 # This doesn't work :(
        if ok.lower() == "n": break

    # Do more processing with menus and stuff

有办法解决这个问题吗?还是我必须先检查一次,跳出输入循环,然后再检查一次,如果用户满意,再跳出外部循环?


当前回答

我来这里的原因是我有一个外循环和一个内循环,像这样:

for x in array:
  for y in dont_use_these_values:
    if x.value==y:
      array.remove(x)  # fixed, was array.pop(x) in my original answer
      continue

  do some other stuff with x

正如你所看到的,它不会去下一个x,而是去下一个y。

我发现解决这个问题的简单方法是遍历数组两次:

for x in array:
  for y in dont_use_these_values:
    if x.value==y:
      array.remove(x)  # fixed, was array.pop(x) in my original answer
      continue

for x in array:
  do some other stuff with x

我知道这是OP问题的一个具体案例,但我发布它是希望它能帮助人们以不同的方式思考他们的问题,同时保持事情简单。

其他回答

由于这个问题已经成为进入特定循环的标准问题,我想用Exception给出我的答案。

虽然在多循环构造中不存在名为“循环中断”的标签,但我们可以使用用户定义异常来中断到我们选择的特定循环。考虑下面的例子,让我们在6进制编号系统中打印所有最多4位的数字:

class BreakLoop(Exception):
    def __init__(self, counter):
        Exception.__init__(self, 'Exception 1')
        self.counter = counter

for counter1 in range(6):   # Make it 1000
    try:
        thousand = counter1 * 1000
        for counter2 in range(6):  # Make it 100
            try:
                hundred = counter2 * 100
                for counter3 in range(6): # Make it 10
                    try:
                        ten = counter3 * 10
                        for counter4 in range(6):
                            try:
                                unit = counter4
                                value = thousand + hundred + ten + unit
                                if unit == 4 :
                                    raise BreakLoop(4) # Don't break from loop
                                if ten == 30: 
                                    raise BreakLoop(3) # Break into loop 3
                                if hundred == 500:
                                    raise BreakLoop(2) # Break into loop 2
                                if thousand == 2000:
                                    raise BreakLoop(1) # Break into loop 1

                                print('{:04d}'.format(value))
                            except BreakLoop as bl:
                                if bl.counter != 4:
                                    raise bl
                    except BreakLoop as bl:
                        if bl.counter != 3:
                            raise bl
            except BreakLoop as bl:
                if bl.counter != 2:
                    raise bl
    except BreakLoop as bl:
        pass

当我们打印输出时,我们永远不会得到任何单位位是4的值。在这种情况下,在同一个循环中引发BreakLoop(4)并捕获时,我们不会中断任何循环。类似地,当十位有3时,我们使用BreakLoop(3)进入第三个循环。当百位是5时,我们使用BreakLoop(2)进入第二个循环,当千位是2时,我们使用BreakLoop(1)进入第一个循环。

简而言之,在内部循环中引发异常(内置或用户定义),并在循环中从您想恢复控件的位置捕获它。如果想从所有循环中中断,可以在所有循环之外捕获异常。(我没有举例说明)。

PEP 3136建议标记中断/继续。Guido拒绝了它,因为“需要这个功能的复杂代码非常罕见”。不过,PEP确实提到了一些变通方法(比如异常技术),而Guido认为在大多数情况下,使用return进行重构会更简单。

以下是一个非常简短的版本: 创建名为break_out_nested.py的文件

import itertools
import sys

it = sys.modules[__name__] # this allows us to share variables with break_out_nested.py when we import it 


def bol(*args):
    condi = args[-1] # the condition function
    i = args[:-1] # all iterables 
    for p in itertools.product(*i): # itertools.product creates the nested loop
        if condi(): # if the condition is True, we return 
            return
        yield p # if not, we yield the result 

现在你只需要几行就可以打破嵌套的循环(数据来自Rafiq的例子)

from break_out_nested import it, bol # import what we have just created

# you need to create new variables as attributes of it,
# because break_out_nested has only access to these variables
it.i, it.j, it.k = 1, 1, 1
# the break condition
def cond(): return it.i % 3 == 0 and it.j % 3 == 0 and it.k % 3 == 0

# The condition will be checked in each loop 
for it.i, it.j, it.k in bol(range(1, 6, 1), range(1, 11, 2, ), range(1, 21, 4), cond):
    print(it.i, it.j, it.k)

更多的例子:

def cond(): return it.i + it.j + it.k == 777

it.i, it.j, it.k = 0, 0, 0
for it.i, it.j, it.k in bol(range(100), range(1000), range(10000), cond):
    print(it.i, it.j, it.k)




def cond(): return it.i + it.j + it.k >= 100000

it.i, it.j, it.k = 0, 0, 0
# you dont have to use it.i, it.j, it.k as the loop variables, you can
# use anything you want, but you have to update the variables somewhere
for i, j, k in bol(range(100), range(1000), range(10000), cond):
    it.i, it.j, it.k = i * 10, j * 100, k * 100
    print(it.i, it.j, it.k)

在Python中有一个隐藏的技巧…Else结构,可以用来模拟双中断,而不需要太多的代码更改/添加。本质上,如果while条件为false,则触发else块。任何异常、continue或break都不会触发else块。有关更多信息,请参阅对“Python while语句上的Else子句”或Python while上的doc (v2.7)的回答。

while True:
    #snip: print out current state
    ok = ""
    while ok != "y" and ok != "n":
        ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
        if ok == "n" or ok == "N":
            break    # Breaks out of inner loop, skipping else

    else:
        break        # Breaks out of outer loop

    #do more processing with menus and stuff

唯一的缺点是需要将双中断条件移到while条件中(或添加一个标志变量)。对于for循环也存在这种变化,其中else块在循环完成后被触发。

下面是一个似乎可以工作的实现:

break_ = False
for i in range(10):
    if break_:
        break
    for j in range(10):
        if j == 3:
            break_ = True
            break
        else:
            print(i, j)

唯一的缺点是你必须在循环之前定义break_。