给定以下代码(不起作用):

while True:
    # Snip: print out current state
    while True:
        ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
        if ok.lower() == "y": break 2 # This doesn't work :(
        if ok.lower() == "n": break

    # Do more processing with menus and stuff

有办法解决这个问题吗?还是我必须先检查一次,跳出输入循环,然后再检查一次,如果用户满意,再跳出外部循环?


当前回答

尽量减少对OP的问题的改变,我只是在打破第一个for循环之前添加了一个标志,并检查外部循环上的标志,看看我们是否需要再次刹车。

break_2 = False
while True:
    # Snip: print out current state
    if break_2: break
    while True:
        ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
        if ok.lower() == "y": break_2 = True
        if break_2: break
        if ok.lower() == "n": break
    # Do more processing with menus and stuff

其他回答

如果您只需要在复杂的for循环巢中测试边缘情况,则可以抛出1/0来引发异常。我保证不会告诉任何人。当您希望快速测试深度嵌套的for循环的单个迭代,并且不想跟踪大量break语句或注释掉大量代码时,这种方法非常方便。

是的,您可以将它包装在函数中并使用return,但在某些上下文中,这可能会非常麻烦。

入门级程序员的例子:

for i in first_iter:
    for j in second_iter:
        for k in third_iter:
            print(i_want_to_run_this_once_and_stop_executing(i,j,k))
            1/0
        code_that_takes_a_long_time()
    expensive_code()

在执行大量数据预处理的大型jupyter笔记本脚本中,这尤其方便。

首先,普通的逻辑是有用的。

如果由于某种原因,终止条件无法确定,例外是一个后备计划。

class GetOutOfLoop( Exception ):
    pass

try:
    done= False
    while not done:
        isok= False
        while not (done or isok):
            ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
            if ok in ("y", "Y") or ok in ("n", "N") : 
                done= True # probably better
                raise GetOutOfLoop
        # other stuff
except GetOutOfLoop:
    pass

对于这个特定的示例,可能不需要异常。

另一方面,在字符模式应用程序中,我们经常有“Y”、“N”和“Q”选项。对于"Q"选项,我们要立即退出。这是比较特殊的。

使用numpy.ndindex可以简单地将多个循环转换为单个、可破坏的循环

for i in range(n):
  for j in range(n):
    val = x[i, j]
    break # still inside the outer loop!

for i, j in np.ndindex(n, n):
  val = x[i, j]
  break # you left the only loop there was!

您确实需要索引到对象中,而不是显式地遍历值,但至少在简单的情况下,它似乎比大多数答案所建议的要简单大约2-20倍。

以下是一个非常简短的版本: 创建名为break_out_nested.py的文件

import itertools
import sys

it = sys.modules[__name__] # this allows us to share variables with break_out_nested.py when we import it 


def bol(*args):
    condi = args[-1] # the condition function
    i = args[:-1] # all iterables 
    for p in itertools.product(*i): # itertools.product creates the nested loop
        if condi(): # if the condition is True, we return 
            return
        yield p # if not, we yield the result 

现在你只需要几行就可以打破嵌套的循环(数据来自Rafiq的例子)

from break_out_nested import it, bol # import what we have just created

# you need to create new variables as attributes of it,
# because break_out_nested has only access to these variables
it.i, it.j, it.k = 1, 1, 1
# the break condition
def cond(): return it.i % 3 == 0 and it.j % 3 == 0 and it.k % 3 == 0

# The condition will be checked in each loop 
for it.i, it.j, it.k in bol(range(1, 6, 1), range(1, 11, 2, ), range(1, 21, 4), cond):
    print(it.i, it.j, it.k)

更多的例子:

def cond(): return it.i + it.j + it.k == 777

it.i, it.j, it.k = 0, 0, 0
for it.i, it.j, it.k in bol(range(100), range(1000), range(10000), cond):
    print(it.i, it.j, it.k)




def cond(): return it.i + it.j + it.k >= 100000

it.i, it.j, it.k = 0, 0, 0
# you dont have to use it.i, it.j, it.k as the loop variables, you can
# use anything you want, but you have to update the variables somewhere
for i, j, k in bol(range(100), range(1000), range(10000), cond):
    it.i, it.j, it.k = i * 10, j * 100, k * 100
    print(it.i, it.j, it.k)

我想提醒你,Python中的函数可以在代码中间创建,并且可以透明地访问周围的变量以进行读取,也可以通过非局部或全局声明进行写入。

所以你可以使用一个函数作为“易碎的控制结构”,定义一个你想要返回的地方:

def is_prime(number):

    foo = bar = number

    def return_here():
        nonlocal foo, bar
        init_bar = bar
        while foo > 0:
            bar = init_bar
            while bar >= foo:
                if foo*bar == number:
                    return
                bar -= 1
            foo -= 1

    return_here()

    if foo == 1:
        print(number, 'is prime')
    else:
        print(number, '=', bar, '*', foo)

>>> is_prime(67)
67 is prime
>>> is_prime(117)
117 = 13 * 9
>>> is_prime(16)
16 = 4 * 4