到目前为止，所有的答案不是考虑了太少的程序集就是考虑了太多的程序集。您只需检查引用包含该接口的程序集的程序集。这最大限度地减少了不必要地运行静态构造函数的数量，并节省了大量的时间，并且在第三方程序集的情况下可能会产生意想不到的副作用。

public static class ReflectionUtils
{
    public static bool DoesTypeSupportInterface(Type type, Type inter)
    {
        if (inter.IsAssignableFrom(type))
            return true;
        if (type.GetInterfaces().Any(i => i.IsGenericType && i.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == inter))
            return true;
        return false;
    }

    public static IEnumerable<Assembly> GetReferencingAssemblies(Assembly assembly)
    {
        return AppDomain
            .CurrentDomain
            .GetAssemblies().Where(asm => asm.GetReferencedAssemblies().Any(asmName => AssemblyName.ReferenceMatchesDefinition(asmName, assembly.GetName())));
    }

    public static IEnumerable<Type> TypesImplementingInterface(Type desiredType)
    {
        var assembliesToSearch = new Assembly[] { desiredType.Assembly }
            .Concat(GetReferencingAssemblies(desiredType.Assembly));
        return assembliesToSearch.SelectMany(assembly => assembly.GetTypes())
            .Where(type => DoesTypeSupportInterface(type, desiredType));
    }

    public static IEnumerable<Type> NonAbstractTypesImplementingInterface(Type desiredType)
    {
        return TypesImplementingInterface(desiredType).Where(t => !t.IsAbstract);
    }
}

编辑:我刚刚看到了编辑，澄清了最初的问题是为了减少迭代/代码，这作为一个练习是很好的，但在实际情况下，你会想要最快的实现，不管底层LINQ看起来有多酷。

下面是我的Utils方法，用于遍历加载的类型。它处理常规类和接口，如果您正在自己的/第三方代码库中寻找实现，那么excludeSystemTypes选项将极大地加快速度。

public static List<Type> GetSubclassesOf(this Type type, bool excludeSystemTypes) {
    List<Type> list = new List<Type>();
    IEnumerator enumerator = Thread.GetDomain().GetAssemblies().GetEnumerator();
    while (enumerator.MoveNext()) {
        try {
            Type[] types = ((Assembly) enumerator.Current).GetTypes();
            if (!excludeSystemTypes || (excludeSystemTypes && !((Assembly) enumerator.Current).FullName.StartsWith("System."))) {
                IEnumerator enumerator2 = types.GetEnumerator();
                while (enumerator2.MoveNext()) {
                    Type current = (Type) enumerator2.Current;
                    if (type.IsInterface) {
                        if (current.GetInterface(type.FullName) != null) {
                            list.Add(current);
                        }
                    } else if (current.IsSubclassOf(type)) {
                        list.Add(current);
                    }
                }
            }
        } catch {
        }
    }
    return list;
}

我承认，这并不漂亮。

我的是c# 3.0:)

var type = typeof(IMyInterface);
var types = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()
    .SelectMany(s => s.GetTypes())
    .Where(p => type.IsAssignableFrom(p));

基本上，最少的迭代次数总是:

loop assemblies  
 loop types  
  see if implemented.

我在linq-code中得到了异常，所以我这样做(没有复杂的扩展):

private static IList<Type> loadAllImplementingTypes(Type[] interfaces)
{
    IList<Type> implementingTypes = new List<Type>();

    // find all types
    foreach (var interfaceType in interfaces)
        foreach (var currentAsm in AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies())
            try
            {
                foreach (var currentType in currentAsm.GetTypes())
                    if (interfaceType.IsAssignableFrom(currentType) && currentType.IsClass && !currentType.IsAbstract)
                        implementingTypes.Add(currentType);
            }
            catch { }

    return implementingTypes;
}

遍历所有加载的程序集，遍历它们的所有类型，并检查它们是否实现了接口。

喜欢的东西:

Type ti = typeof(IYourInterface);
foreach (Assembly asm in AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()) {
    foreach (Type t in asm.GetTypes()) {
        if (ti.IsAssignableFrom(t)) {
            // here's your type in t
        }
    }
}

到目前为止，所有的答案不是考虑了太少的程序集就是考虑了太多的程序集。您只需检查引用包含该接口的程序集的程序集。这最大限度地减少了不必要地运行静态构造函数的数量，并节省了大量的时间，并且在第三方程序集的情况下可能会产生意想不到的副作用。

public static class ReflectionUtils
{
    public static bool DoesTypeSupportInterface(Type type, Type inter)
    {
        if (inter.IsAssignableFrom(type))
            return true;
        if (type.GetInterfaces().Any(i => i.IsGenericType && i.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == inter))
            return true;
        return false;
    }

    public static IEnumerable<Assembly> GetReferencingAssemblies(Assembly assembly)
    {
        return AppDomain
            .CurrentDomain
            .GetAssemblies().Where(asm => asm.GetReferencedAssemblies().Any(asmName => AssemblyName.ReferenceMatchesDefinition(asmName, assembly.GetName())));
    }

    public static IEnumerable<Type> TypesImplementingInterface(Type desiredType)
    {
        var assembliesToSearch = new Assembly[] { desiredType.Assembly }
            .Concat(GetReferencingAssemblies(desiredType.Assembly));
        return assembliesToSearch.SelectMany(assembly => assembly.GetTypes())
            .Where(type => DoesTypeSupportInterface(type, desiredType));
    }

    public static IEnumerable<Type> NonAbstractTypesImplementingInterface(Type desiredType)
    {
        return TypesImplementingInterface(desiredType).Where(t => !t.IsAbstract);
    }
}