是否有一个聪明的(即优化)方法重命名一个关键在javascript对象?

一种非优化的方式是:

o[ new_key ] = o[ old_key ];
delete o[ old_key ];

当前回答

const clone = (obj) => Object.assign({}, obj);

const renameKey = (object, key, newKey) => {

    const clonedObj = clone(object);
  
    const targetKey = clonedObj[key];
  
  
  
    delete clonedObj[key];
  
    clonedObj[newKey] = targetKey;
  
    return clonedObj;
     };

  let contact = {radiant: 11, dire: 22};





contact = renameKey(contact, 'radiant', 'aplha');

contact = renameKey(contact, 'dire', 'omega');



console.log(contact); // { aplha: 11, omega: 22 };

其他回答

我会这样做:

function renameKeys(dict, keyMap) {
  return _.reduce(dict, function(newDict, val, oldKey) {
    var newKey = keyMap[oldKey] || oldKey
    newDict[newKey] = val 
    return newDict
  }, {})
}

我只想用ES6(ES2015)的方式!

我们需要跟上时代!

const old_obj = { k1: `111`, k2: `222`, k3: `333` }; console.log(`old_obj =\n`, old_obj); // {k1: "111", k2: "222", k3: "333"} /** * @author xgqfrms * @description ES6 ...spread & Destructuring Assignment */ const { k1: kA, k2: kB, k3: kC, } = {...old_obj} console.log(`kA = ${kA},`, `kB = ${kB},`, `kC = ${kC}\n`); // kA = 111, kB = 222, kC = 333 const new_obj = Object.assign( {}, { kA, kB, kC } ); console.log(`new_obj =\n`, new_obj); // {kA: "111", kB: "222", kC: "333"}

在您最喜欢的编辑器中尝试一下

const obj = {1: 'a', 2: 'b', 3: 'c'}

const OLD_KEY = 1
const NEW_KEY = 10

const { [OLD_KEY]: replaceByKey, ...rest } = obj
const new_obj = {
  ...rest,
  [NEW_KEY]: replaceByKey
}

如果有人需要重命名属性列表:

function renameKeys(obj, newKeys) {
  const keyValues = Object.keys(obj).map(key => {
    const newKey = newKeys[key] || key;
    return { [newKey]: obj[key] };
  });
  return Object.assign({}, ...keyValues);
}

用法:

const obj = { a: "1", b: "2" };
const newKeys = { a: "A", c: "C" };
const renamedObj = renameKeys(obj, newKeys);
console.log(renamedObj);
// {A:"1", b:"2"}

在我看来,你的方法是最优化的。但你最终会得到重新排序的密钥。新创建的密钥将附加在末尾。我知道你不应该依赖键的顺序,但如果你需要保存它,你将需要遍历所有键并一个接一个地构造新对象,在这个过程中替换有问题的键。

是这样的:

var new_o={};
for (var i in o)
{
   if (i==old_key) new_o[new_key]=o[old_key];
   else new_o[i]=o[i];
}
o=new_o;