有了一个点列表,我如何确定它们是否是顺时针顺序的?
例如:
point[0] = (5,0)
point[1] = (6,4)
point[2] = (4,5)
point[3] = (1,5)
point[4] = (1,0)
会说它是逆时针的(对某些人来说是逆时针的)
有了一个点列表,我如何确定它们是否是顺时针顺序的?
例如:
point[0] = (5,0)
point[1] = (6,4)
point[2] = (4,5)
point[3] = (1,5)
point[4] = (1,0)
会说它是逆时针的(对某些人来说是逆时针的)
当前回答
对于那些不想“重新发明轮子”的人,我认为值得一提的是,这个检查是在一个名为Shapely (github)的漂亮的Python包中实现的(它基于GEOS C/ c++库):
Shapely is a BSD-licensed Python package for manipulation and analysis of planar geometric objects. It is using the widely deployed open-source geometry library GEOS (the engine of PostGIS, and a port of JTS). Shapely wraps GEOS geometries and operations to provide both a feature rich Geometry interface for singular (scalar) geometries and higher-performance NumPy ufuncs for operations using arrays of geometries. Shapely is not primarily focused on data serialization formats or coordinate systems, but can be readily integrated with packages that are.
来源:https://shapely.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
一个给出OP坐标的小例子:
import numpy as np
from shapely.geometry import Polygon
points = np.array([
(5,0),
(6,4),
(4,5),
(1,5),
(1,0)
])
P = Polygon(points)
这是新构造的多边形:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x,y = P.exterior.coords.xy
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.axis('equal')
plt.grid()
plt.show()
你可以直接使用LinearRing的is_ccw属性来检查多边形是CW还是CCW:
type(P.exterior)
>: shapely.geometry.polygon.LinearRing
P.exterior.is_ccw
>: True
如果颠倒:
points = np.flipud(points)
points
>:
array([[1, 0],
[1, 5],
[4, 5],
[6, 4],
[5, 0]])
P1 = Polygon(points)
P1.exterior.is_ccw
>: True
进一步阅读的文档和参考资料:
shaely is_ccw (github): https://github.com/shapely/shapely/blob/eba985c6e0170ecdd90c83592fd0afa7ae793cb8/shapely/predicates.py#L72-L108 Libgeos (github): https://github.com/libgeos/geos GEOS API参考:https://libgeos.org/doxygen/classgeos_1_1algorithm_1_1Orientation.html#a5af93795969b80f97d7997195974d7c8 GEOS实现(github): https://github.com/libgeos/geos/blob/ab0ce6dafdf7f75ec6d234b6c65bb209037dda17/src/algorithm/Orientation.cpp#L43-L133
其他回答
一些建议的方法在非凸多边形(如新月形)的情况下会失败。这里有一个简单的方法,它可以用于非凸多边形(它甚至可以用于自相交的多边形,如数字8,告诉你它是否主要是顺时针)。
对边求和,(x2−x1)(y2 + y1)如果结果是正的,曲线是顺时针的,如果结果是负的,曲线是逆时针的。(结果是封闭面积的两倍,采用+/-惯例。)
point[0] = (5,0) edge[0]: (6-5)(4+0) = 4
point[1] = (6,4) edge[1]: (4-6)(5+4) = -18
point[2] = (4,5) edge[2]: (1-4)(5+5) = -30
point[3] = (1,5) edge[3]: (1-1)(0+5) = 0
point[4] = (1,0) edge[4]: (5-1)(0+0) = 0
---
-44 counter-clockwise
我的c# / LINQ解决方案是基于下面@charlesbretana的交叉积建议的。你可以为线圈指定一个参考法线。只要曲线大部分在向上向量所定义的平面内,它就可以工作。
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Numerics;
namespace SolidworksAddinFramework.Geometry
{
public static class PlanePolygon
{
/// <summary>
/// Assumes that polygon is closed, ie first and last points are the same
/// </summary>
public static bool Orientation
(this IEnumerable<Vector3> polygon, Vector3 up)
{
var sum = polygon
.Buffer(2, 1) // from Interactive Extensions Nuget Pkg
.Where(b => b.Count == 2)
.Aggregate
( Vector3.Zero
, (p, b) => p + Vector3.Cross(b[0], b[1])
/b[0].Length()/b[1].Length());
return Vector3.Dot(up, sum) > 0;
}
}
}
使用单元测试
namespace SolidworksAddinFramework.Spec.Geometry
{
public class PlanePolygonSpec
{
[Fact]
public void OrientationShouldWork()
{
var points = Sequences.LinSpace(0, Math.PI*2, 100)
.Select(t => new Vector3((float) Math.Cos(t), (float) Math.Sin(t), 0))
.ToList();
points.Orientation(Vector3.UnitZ).Should().BeTrue();
points.Reverse();
points.Orientation(Vector3.UnitZ).Should().BeFalse();
}
}
}
Sean的答案的JavaScript实现:
function calcArea(poly) { if(!poly || poly.length < 3) return null; let end = poly.length - 1; let sum = poly[end][0]*poly[0][1] - poly[0][0]*poly[end][1]; for(let i=0; i<end; ++i) { const n=i+1; sum += poly[i][0]*poly[n][1] - poly[n][0]*poly[i][1]; } return sum; } function isClockwise(poly) { return calcArea(poly) > 0; } let poly = [[352,168],[305,208],[312,256],[366,287],[434,248],[416,186]]; console.log(isClockwise(poly)); let poly2 = [[618,186],[650,170],[701,179],[716,207],[708,247],[666,259],[637,246],[615,219]]; console.log(isClockwise(poly2));
我很确定这是对的。这似乎是有效的:-)
这些多边形看起来是这样的,如果你想知道的话:
这是OpenLayers 2的实现函数。有一个顺时针多边形的条件是面积< 0,这是由这个参考确定的。
function IsClockwise(feature)
{
if(feature.geometry == null)
return -1;
var vertices = feature.geometry.getVertices();
var area = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < (vertices.length); i++) {
j = (i + 1) % vertices.length;
area += vertices[i].x * vertices[j].y;
area -= vertices[j].x * vertices[i].y;
// console.log(area);
}
return (area < 0);
}
虽然这些答案是正确的,但它们在数学上的强度比必要的要大。假设地图坐标,其中最北的点是地图上的最高点。找到最北的点,如果两个点相等,它是最北的,然后是最东的(这是lhf在他的答案中使用的点)。在你的观点中,
点[0]= (5,0)
点[1]= (6,4)
点[2]= (4,5)
点[3]= (1,5)
点[4]= (1,0)
If we assume that P2 is the most north then east point either the previous or next point determine clockwise, CW, or CCW. Since the most north point is on the north face, if the P1 (previous) to P2 moves east the direction is CW. In this case, it moves west, so the direction is CCW as the accepted answer says. If the previous point has no horizontal movement, then the same system applies to the next point, P3. If P3 is west of P2, it is, then the movement is CCW. If the P2 to P3 movement is east, it's west in this case, the movement is CW. Assume that nte, P2 in your data, is the most north then east point and the prv is the previous point, P1 in your data, and nxt is the next point, P3 in your data, and [0] is horizontal or east/west where west is less than east, and [1] is vertical.
if (nte[0] >= prv[0] && nxt[0] >= nte[0]) return(CW);
if (nte[0] <= prv[0] && nxt[0] <= nte[0]) return(CCW);
// Okay, it's not easy-peasy, so now, do the math
if (nte[0] * nxt[1] - nte[1] * nxt[0] - prv[0] * (nxt[1] - crt[1]) + prv[1] * (nxt[0] - nte[0]) >= 0) return(CCW); // For quadrant 3 return(CW)
return(CW) // For quadrant 3 return (CCW)