有了一个点列表,我如何确定它们是否是顺时针顺序的?
例如:
point[0] = (5,0)
point[1] = (6,4)
point[2] = (4,5)
point[3] = (1,5)
point[4] = (1,0)
会说它是逆时针的(对某些人来说是逆时针的)
有了一个点列表,我如何确定它们是否是顺时针顺序的?
例如:
point[0] = (5,0)
point[1] = (6,4)
point[2] = (4,5)
point[3] = (1,5)
point[4] = (1,0)
会说它是逆时针的(对某些人来说是逆时针的)
当前回答
The cross product measures the degree of perpendicular-ness of two vectors. Imagine that each edge of your polygon is a vector in the x-y plane of a three-dimensional (3-D) xyz space. Then the cross product of two successive edges is a vector in the z-direction, (positive z-direction if the second segment is clockwise, minus z-direction if it's counter-clockwise). The magnitude of this vector is proportional to the sine of the angle between the two original edges, so it reaches a maximum when they are perpendicular, and tapers off to disappear when the edges are collinear (parallel).
因此,对于多边形的每个顶点(点),计算两条相邻边的叉乘大小:
Using your data:
point[0] = (5, 0)
point[1] = (6, 4)
point[2] = (4, 5)
point[3] = (1, 5)
point[4] = (1, 0)
把边连续地标为 edgeA是从point0到point1的段 点1到点2之间的edgeB ... edgeE在point4和point0之间。
那么顶点A (point0)在两者之间 edgeE[从点4到点0] 从point0到' point1'
这两条边本身就是向量,它们的x坐标和y坐标可以通过减去它们的起点和终点的坐标来确定:
edgeE = point0 - point4 = (1,0) - (5,0) = (- 4,0) and edgeA = point1 - point0 = (6,4) - (1,0) = (5,4) and
这两个相邻边的外积是用下面矩阵的行列式来计算的,这个矩阵是通过将两个向量的坐标放在表示三个坐标轴的符号(i, j, & k)下面来构造的。第三个(零)值坐标在那里,因为外积概念是一个三维结构,所以我们将这些2-D向量扩展到3-D,以便应用外积:
i j k
-4 0 0
1 4 0
假设所有的叉乘都产生一个垂直于两个向量相乘平面的向量,上面矩阵的行列式只有一个k(或z轴)分量。 计算k轴或z轴分量大小的公式为 A1 *b2 - a2*b1 = -4* 4 - 0* 1 = -16
这个值的大小(-16)是两个原始向量夹角的正弦值,乘以两个向量大小的乘积。 实际上,它值的另一个公式是 A X B(叉乘)= |A| * |B| * sin(AB)。
为了得到角度的大小你需要用这个值(-16)除以两个向量大小的乘积。
|A| * |B| = 4 *根号(17)= 16.4924…
所以sin(AB) = -16 / 16.4924 = -.97014…
这是一个度量顶点后的下一段是否向左或向右弯曲,以及弯曲的程度。不需要取arcsin函数。我们只关心它的大小,当然还有它的符号(正的还是负的)!
对闭合路径周围的其他4个点都这样做,并将每个顶点的计算值相加。
如果最终的和是正的,就顺时针,负的,逆时针。
其他回答
为了它的价值,我使用这个mixin来计算谷歌Maps API v3应用程序的缠绕顺序。
该代码利用了多边形区域的副作用:顺时针旋转顺序的顶点产生一个正的区域,而逆时针旋转顺序的相同顶点产生一个负的区域。该代码还使用了谷歌Maps几何库中的一种私有API。我觉得使用它很舒服——使用风险自负。
示例用法:
var myPolygon = new google.maps.Polygon({/*options*/});
var isCW = myPolygon.isPathClockwise();
完整的单元测试示例@ http://jsfiddle.net/stevejansen/bq2ec/
/** Mixin to extend the behavior of the Google Maps JS API Polygon type
* to determine if a polygon path has clockwise of counter-clockwise winding order.
*
* Tested against v3.14 of the GMaps API.
*
* @author stevejansen_github@icloud.com
*
* @license http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
*
* @version 1.0
*
* @mixin
*
* @param {(number|Array|google.maps.MVCArray)} [path] - an optional polygon path; defaults to the first path of the polygon
* @returns {boolean} true if the path is clockwise; false if the path is counter-clockwise
*/
(function() {
var category = 'google.maps.Polygon.isPathClockwise';
// check that the GMaps API was already loaded
if (null == google || null == google.maps || null == google.maps.Polygon) {
console.error(category, 'Google Maps API not found');
return;
}
if (typeof(google.maps.geometry.spherical.computeArea) !== 'function') {
console.error(category, 'Google Maps geometry library not found');
return;
}
if (typeof(google.maps.geometry.spherical.computeSignedArea) !== 'function') {
console.error(category, 'Google Maps geometry library private function computeSignedArea() is missing; this may break this mixin');
}
function isPathClockwise(path) {
var self = this,
isCounterClockwise;
if (null === path)
throw new Error('Path is optional, but cannot be null');
// default to the first path
if (arguments.length === 0)
path = self.getPath();
// support for passing an index number to a path
if (typeof(path) === 'number')
path = self.getPaths().getAt(path);
if (!path instanceof Array && !path instanceof google.maps.MVCArray)
throw new Error('Path must be an Array or MVCArray');
// negative polygon areas have counter-clockwise paths
isCounterClockwise = (google.maps.geometry.spherical.computeSignedArea(path) < 0);
return (!isCounterClockwise);
}
if (typeof(google.maps.Polygon.prototype.isPathClockwise) !== 'function') {
google.maps.Polygon.prototype.isPathClockwise = isPathClockwise;
}
})();
对于那些不想“重新发明轮子”的人,我认为值得一提的是,这个检查是在一个名为Shapely (github)的漂亮的Python包中实现的(它基于GEOS C/ c++库):
Shapely is a BSD-licensed Python package for manipulation and analysis of planar geometric objects. It is using the widely deployed open-source geometry library GEOS (the engine of PostGIS, and a port of JTS). Shapely wraps GEOS geometries and operations to provide both a feature rich Geometry interface for singular (scalar) geometries and higher-performance NumPy ufuncs for operations using arrays of geometries. Shapely is not primarily focused on data serialization formats or coordinate systems, but can be readily integrated with packages that are.
来源:https://shapely.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
一个给出OP坐标的小例子:
import numpy as np
from shapely.geometry import Polygon
points = np.array([
(5,0),
(6,4),
(4,5),
(1,5),
(1,0)
])
P = Polygon(points)
这是新构造的多边形:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x,y = P.exterior.coords.xy
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.axis('equal')
plt.grid()
plt.show()
你可以直接使用LinearRing的is_ccw属性来检查多边形是CW还是CCW:
type(P.exterior)
>: shapely.geometry.polygon.LinearRing
P.exterior.is_ccw
>: True
如果颠倒:
points = np.flipud(points)
points
>:
array([[1, 0],
[1, 5],
[4, 5],
[6, 4],
[5, 0]])
P1 = Polygon(points)
P1.exterior.is_ccw
>: True
进一步阅读的文档和参考资料:
shaely is_ccw (github): https://github.com/shapely/shapely/blob/eba985c6e0170ecdd90c83592fd0afa7ae793cb8/shapely/predicates.py#L72-L108 Libgeos (github): https://github.com/libgeos/geos GEOS API参考:https://libgeos.org/doxygen/classgeos_1_1algorithm_1_1Orientation.html#a5af93795969b80f97d7997195974d7c8 GEOS实现(github): https://github.com/libgeos/geos/blob/ab0ce6dafdf7f75ec6d234b6c65bb209037dda17/src/algorithm/Orientation.cpp#L43-L133
我将提出另一个解决方案,因为它很简单,不需要大量的数学运算,它只是使用了基本的代数。计算多边形的带符号面积。如果是负的,点是顺时针的,如果是正的,点是逆时针的。(这与Beta的解决方案非常相似。)
计算带符号的面积: A = 1/2 * (x1*y2 - x2*y1 + x2*y3 - x3*y2 +…+ xn*y1 - x1*yn)
或者在伪代码中:
signedArea = 0
for each point in points:
x1 = point[0]
y1 = point[1]
if point is last point
x2 = firstPoint[0]
y2 = firstPoint[1]
else
x2 = nextPoint[0]
y2 = nextPoint[1]
end if
signedArea += (x1 * y2 - x2 * y1)
end for
return signedArea / 2
注意,如果你只是检查顺序,你不需要麻烦除以2。
来源:http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PolygonArea.html
以下是基于上述答案的swift 3.0解决方案:
for (i, point) in allPoints.enumerated() {
let nextPoint = i == allPoints.count - 1 ? allPoints[0] : allPoints[i+1]
signedArea += (point.x * nextPoint.y - nextPoint.x * point.y)
}
let clockwise = signedArea < 0
在测试了几个不可靠的实现之后,在CW/CCW方向方面提供令人满意结果的算法是由OP在这个线程(shoelace_formula_3)中发布的算法。
与往常一样,正数表示CW方向,而负数表示CCW方向。