单核细胞增多症很好，但据我所知，它不稳定。它可以工作，但是当你给单一进程一个严肃的工作去做时，它就会出错。

TL;DR -如果你:

在多线程环境中使用AppDomains(程序集加载/卸载) 无法维持“听之任之”的模式 在流程运行期间偶尔经历重载事件

下面是事实。

我们在RHEL5和Ubuntu上使用mono-2.6.7 (.net v 3.5)，在我看来，它是由Novell构建的最稳定的版本。它有一个问题卸载AppDomains (segfaults)，然而，它失败非常罕见，到目前为止，这是可以接受的(由我们)。

好的。但是如果你想使用。net 4.0的特性，你必须切换到2.10版本。X，或者3。X，这就是问题开始的地方。

与2.6.7相比，新版本简直无法接受。我编写了一个简单的压力测试应用程序来测试mono安装。

它在这里，并附有使用说明:https://github.com/head-thrash/stress_test_mono

它使用线程池工作线程。Worker将dll加载到AppDomain并尝试做一些数学工作。有些工作是多线程的，有些是单线程的。几乎所有的工作都是cpu限制的，尽管有一些从磁盘读取文件。

结果不是很好。事实上，对于3.0.12版本:

sgen GC段错误几乎立即处理 带有boehm的Mono存活时间更长(从2到5小时)，但最终会出现段故障

如上所述，sgen gc不能工作(mono从源代码构建):

* Assertion: should not be reached at sgen-scan-object.h:111

Stacktrace:


Native stacktrace:

    mono() [0x4ab0ad]
    /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0xfcb0) [0x2b61ea830cb0]
    /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35) [0x2b61eaa74425]
    /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(abort+0x17b) [0x2b61eaa77b8b]
    mono() [0x62b49d]
    mono() [0x62b5d6]
    mono() [0x5d4f84]
    mono() [0x5cb0af]
    mono() [0x5cb2cc]
    mono() [0x5cccfd]
    mono() [0x5cd944]
    mono() [0x5d12b6]
    mono(mono_gc_collect+0x28) [0x5d16f8]
    mono(mono_domain_finalize+0x7c) [0x59fb1c]
    mono() [0x596ef0]
    mono() [0x616f13]
    mono() [0x626ee0]
    /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x7e9a) [0x2b61ea828e9a]
    /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d) [0x2b61eab31ccd]

对于boehm segfaults -例如(Ubuntu 13.04, mono从源代码构建):

mono: mini-amd64.c:492: amd64_patch: Assertion `0' failed.
Stacktrace:
at <unknown> <0xffffffff>
at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2.Init (int,System.Collections.Generic.IEqualityComparer`1<TKey>) [0x00012] in /home/bkmz/my/mono/mcs/class/corlib/System.Collections.Generic/Dictionary.cs:264
at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2..ctor () [0x00006] in /home/bkmz/my/mono/mcs/class/corlib/System.Collections.Generic/Dictionary.cs:222
at System.Security.Cryptography.CryptoConfig/CryptoHandler..ctor (System.Collections.Generic.IDictionary`2<string, System.Type>,System.Collections.Generic.IDictionary`2<string, string>) [0x00014] in /home/bkmz/my/mono/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/Crypto
Config.cs:582
at System.Security.Cryptography.CryptoConfig.LoadConfig (string,System.Collections.Generic.IDictionary`2<string, System.Type>,System.Collections.Generic.IDictionary`2<string, string>) [0x00013] in /home/bkmz/my/mono/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/CryptoCo
nfig.cs:473
at System.Security.Cryptography.CryptoConfig.Initialize () [0x00697] in /home/bkmz/my/mono/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/CryptoConfig.cs:457
at System.Security.Cryptography.CryptoConfig.CreateFromName (string,object[]) [0x00027] in /home/bkmz/my/mono/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/CryptoConfig.cs:495
at System.Security.Cryptography.CryptoConfig.CreateFromName (string) [0x00000] in /home/bkmz/my/mono/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/CryptoConfig.cs:484
at System.Security.Cryptography.RandomNumberGenerator.Create (string) [0x00000] in /home/bkmz/my/mono/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/RandomNumberGenerator.cs:59
at System.Security.Cryptography.RandomNumberGenerator.Create () [0x00000] in /home/bkmz/my/mono/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/RandomNumberGenerator.cs:53
at System.Guid.NewGuid () [0x0001e] in /home/bkmz/my/mono/mcs/class/corlib/System/Guid.cs:492

或者(RHEL5, mono从rpm这里取ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/home%3A/vmas%3A/mono-centos5)

Assertion at mini.c:3783, condition `code' not met
Stacktrace:
at <unknown> <0xffffffff>
at System.IO.StreamReader.ReadBuffer () [0x00012] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/System.IO/StreamReader.cs:394
at System.IO.StreamReader.Peek () [0x00006] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/System.IO/StreamReader.cs:429
at Mono.Xml.SmallXmlParser.Peek () [0x00000] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/Mono.Xml/SmallXmlParser.cs:271
at Mono.Xml.SmallXmlParser.Parse (System.IO.TextReader,Mono.Xml.SmallXmlParser/IContentHandler) [0x00020] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/Mono.Xml/SmallXmlParser.cs:346
at System.Security.Cryptography.CryptoConfig.LoadConfig (string,System.Collections.Generic.IDictionary`2<string, System.Type>,System.Collections.Generic.IDictionary`2<string, string>) [0x00021] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptog
raphy/CryptoConfig.cs:475
at System.Security.Cryptography.CryptoConfig.Initialize () [0x00697] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/CryptoConfig.cs:457
at System.Security.Cryptography.CryptoConfig.CreateFromName (string,object[]) [0x00027] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/CryptoConfig.cs:495
at System.Security.Cryptography.CryptoConfig.CreateFromName (string) [0x00000] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/CryptoConfig.cs:484
at System.Security.Cryptography.RandomNumberGenerator.Create (string) [0x00000] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/RandomNumberGenerator.cs:59
at System.Security.Cryptography.RandomNumberGenerator.Create () [0x00000] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/RandomNumberGenerator.cs:53
at System.Guid.NewGuid () [0x0001e] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/System/Guid.cs:483
at System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingServices.NewUri () [0x00020] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/System.Runtime.Remoting/RemotingServices.cs:356
at System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingServices.Marshal (System.MarshalByRefObject,string,System.Type) [0x000ba] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/System.Runtime.Remoting/RemotingServices.cs:329
at System.AppDomain.GetMarshalledDomainObjRef () [0x00000] in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/mono-3.0.3/mcs/class/corlib/System/AppDomain.cs:1363

这两种失败在某种程度上都与AppDomains逻辑有关，所以，你应该在mono中远离它们。

顺便说一句，测试的程序在Windows机器上运行24小时，在MS . net 4.5环境下没有任何故障。

总之，我想说的是，谨慎使用单倍体。它从第一眼就能起作用，但无论何时都很容易失败。你会留下一堆核心转储和对开源项目的重大信心损失。

MoMA是一个很好的工具，就像其他人建议的那样。目前最大的不兼容性来源是将DllImport(或P/Invoke)导入Win32库的应用程序。有些程序集没有实现，但大多数程序集仅适用于windows，在Linux上确实没有意义。我认为可以肯定地说，大多数ASP。NET应用程序可以在Mono上运行，只需进行有限的修改。

(披露:我为Mono本身做出了贡献，也编写了在Mono上运行的应用程序。)

你知道Mono 2.0预览版对Windows Forms 2.0的支持有多好吗?

从我使用它的一小部分来看，它似乎相对完整，几乎可用。它只是在一些地方看起来不太对，总的来说还是有点命中或错过。说实话，它和我们的一些表格一样好用，这让我很惊讶。

对于公认答案的建议现在有点过时了。

The windows forms implementation is pretty good now. (See Paint-Mono for a port of Paint.net which is a pretty involved Windows forms application. All that was required was an emulation layer for some of the P-Invoke and unsupported system calls). Path.Combine as well as Path.Seperator to join paths and filenames. The windows Registry is OK, as long as you are only using it for storing and retrieving data from your applications (i.e. you can't get any information about Windows from it, since it is basically a registry for Mono applications).

我可以想象，如果你有一个带有一些第三方组件的应用程序，你可能会被塞满。我怀疑很多供应商会在开发过程中考虑到Mono

例如:http://community.devexpress.com/forums/p/55085/185853.aspx

请查看www.plasticscm.com。所有东西(客户端、服务器、GUI、合并工具)都是在mono上编写的。