AngularJS

Speigg的方法非常简洁，尽管我在搜索通过字符串路径访问AngularJS $scope属性的解决方案时发现了这个回复，并进行了一些修改:

$scope.resolve = function( path, obj ) {
    return path.split('.').reduce( function( prev, curr ) {
        return prev[curr];
    }, obj || this );
}

只需要把这个函数放在你的根控制器中，并像这样使用它的任何子范围:

$scope.resolve( 'path.to.any.object.in.scope')

/**
 * Access a deep value inside a object 
 * Works by passing a path like "foo.bar", also works with nested arrays like "foo[0][1].baz"
 * @author Victor B. https://gist.github.com/victornpb/4c7882c1b9d36292308e
 * Unit tests: http://jsfiddle.net/Victornpb/0u1qygrh/
 */
function getDeepVal(obj, path) {
    if (typeof obj === "undefined" || obj === null) return;
    path = path.split(/[\.\[\]\"\']{1,2}/);
    for (var i = 0, l = path.length; i < l; i++) {
        if (path[i] === "") continue;
        obj = obj[path[i]];
        if (typeof obj === "undefined" || obj === null) return;
    }
    return obj;
}

适用于

getDeepVal(obj,'foo.bar')
getDeepVal(obj,'foo.1.bar')
getDeepVal(obj,'foo[0].baz')
getDeepVal(obj,'foo[1][2]')
getDeepVal(obj,"foo['bar'].baz")
getDeepVal(obj,"foo['bar']['baz']")
getDeepVal(obj,"foo.bar.0.baz[1]['2']['w'].aaa[\"f\"].bb")

也适用于对象内的数组/数组。 防御无效值。

/** * Retrieve nested item from object/array * @param {Object|Array} obj * @param {String} path dot separated * @param {*} def default value ( if result undefined ) * @returns {*} */ function path(obj, path, def){ var i, len; for(i = 0,path = path.split('.'), len = path.length; i < len; i++){ if(!obj || typeof obj !== 'object') return def; obj = obj[path[i]]; } if(obj === undefined) return def; return obj; } ////////////////////////// // TEST // ////////////////////////// var arr = [true, {'sp ace': true}, true] var obj = { 'sp ace': true, arr: arr, nested: {'dotted.str.ing': true}, arr3: arr } shouldThrow(`path(obj, "arr.0")`); shouldBeDefined(`path(obj, "arr[0]")`); shouldBeEqualToNumber(`path(obj, "arr.length")`, 3); shouldBeTrue(`path(obj, "sp ace")`); shouldBeEqualToString(`path(obj, "none.existed.prop", "fallback")`, "fallback"); shouldBeTrue(`path(obj, "nested['dotted.str.ing'])`); <script src="https://cdn.rawgit.com/coderek/e7b30bac7634a50ad8fd/raw/174b6634c8f57aa8aac0716c5b7b2a7098e03584/js-test.js"></script>

在这里我提供了更多的方法，这些方法在很多方面看起来都更快:

选项1:Split string on。Or [Or] Or ' Or "，颠倒过来，跳过空项。

function getValue(path, origin) {
    if (origin === void 0 || origin === null) origin = self ? self : this;
    if (typeof path !== 'string') path = '' + path;
    var parts = path.split(/\[|\]|\.|'|"/g).reverse(), name; // (why reverse? because it's usually faster to pop off the end of an array)
    while (parts.length) { name=parts.pop(); if (name) origin=origin[name]; }
    return origin;
}

选项2(最快的，除了eval):低级字符扫描(没有regex/split/等等，只是一个快速字符扫描)。 注意:该命令不支持索引引用。

function getValue(path, origin) {
    if (origin === void 0 || origin === null) origin = self ? self : this;
    if (typeof path !== 'string') path = '' + path;
    var c = '', pc, i = 0, n = path.length, name = '';
    if (n) while (i<=n) ((c = path[i++]) == '.' || c == '[' || c == ']' || c == void 0) ? (name?(origin = origin[name], name = ''):(pc=='.'||pc=='['||pc==']'&&c==']'?i=n+2:void 0),pc=c) : name += c;
    if (i==n+2) throw "Invalid path: "+path;
    return origin;
} // (around 1,000,000+/- ops/sec)

选项3:(新:选项2扩展到支持引号-有点慢，但仍然很快)

function getValue(path, origin) {
    if (origin === void 0 || origin === null) origin = self ? self : this;
    if (typeof path !== 'string') path = '' + path;
    var c, pc, i = 0, n = path.length, name = '', q;
    while (i<=n)
        ((c = path[i++]) == '.' || c == '[' || c == ']' || c == "'" || c == '"' || c == void 0) ? (c==q&&path[i]==']'?q='':q?name+=c:name?(origin?origin=origin[name]:i=n+2,name='') : (pc=='['&&(c=='"'||c=="'")?q=c:pc=='.'||pc=='['||pc==']'&&c==']'||pc=='"'||pc=="'"?i=n+2:void 0), pc=c) : name += c;
    if (i==n+2 || name) throw "Invalid path: "+path;
    return origin;
}

JSPerf： http://jsperf.com/ways-to-dereference-a-delimited-property-string/3

"eval(...)" is still king though (performance wise that is). If you have property paths directly under your control, there shouldn't be any issues with using 'eval' (especially if speed is desired). If pulling property paths "over the wire" (on the line!? lol :P), then yes, use something else to be safe. Only an idiot would say to never use "eval" at all, as there ARE good reasons when to use it. Also, "It is used in Doug Crockford's JSON parser." If the input is safe, then no problems at all. Use the right tool for the right job, that's it.

现在有一个npm模块可以做到这一点:https://github.com/erictrinh/safe-access

使用示例:

var access = require('safe-access');
access(very, 'nested.property.and.array[0]');

我认为你的要求是:

var part1name = someObject.part1.name;
var part2quantity = someObject.part2.qty;
var part3name1 =  someObject.part3[0].name;

你可以这样问:

var part1name = someObject["part1"]["name"];
var part2quantity = someObject["part2"]["qty"];
var part3name1 =  someObject["part3"][0]["name"];

这两种方法都可行

也许这是你自找的

var partName = "part1";
var nameStr = "name";

var part1name = someObject[partName][nameStr];

终于轮到你自找麻烦了

var partName = "part1.name";

var partBits = partName.split(".");

var part1name = someObject[partBits[0]][partBits[1]];