也适用于对象内的数组/数组。 防御无效值。

/** * Retrieve nested item from object/array * @param {Object|Array} obj * @param {String} path dot separated * @param {*} def default value ( if result undefined ) * @returns {*} */ function path(obj, path, def){ var i, len; for(i = 0,path = path.split('.'), len = path.length; i < len; i++){ if(!obj || typeof obj !== 'object') return def; obj = obj[path[i]]; } if(obj === undefined) return def; return obj; } ////////////////////////// // TEST // ////////////////////////// var arr = [true, {'sp ace': true}, true] var obj = { 'sp ace': true, arr: arr, nested: {'dotted.str.ing': true}, arr3: arr } shouldThrow(`path(obj, "arr.0")`); shouldBeDefined(`path(obj, "arr[0]")`); shouldBeEqualToNumber(`path(obj, "arr.length")`, 3); shouldBeTrue(`path(obj, "sp ace")`); shouldBeEqualToString(`path(obj, "none.existed.prop", "fallback")`, "fallback"); shouldBeTrue(`path(obj, "nested['dotted.str.ing'])`); <script src="https://cdn.rawgit.com/coderek/e7b30bac7634a50ad8fd/raw/174b6634c8f57aa8aac0716c5b7b2a7098e03584/js-test.js"></script>

AngularJS

Speigg的方法非常简洁，尽管我在搜索通过字符串路径访问AngularJS $scope属性的解决方案时发现了这个回复，并进行了一些修改:

$scope.resolve = function( path, obj ) {
    return path.split('.').reduce( function( prev, curr ) {
        return prev[curr];
    }, obj || this );
}

只需要把这个函数放在你的根控制器中，并像这样使用它的任何子范围:

$scope.resolve( 'path.to.any.object.in.scope')

我认为你的要求是:

var part1name = someObject.part1.name;
var part2quantity = someObject.part2.qty;
var part3name1 =  someObject.part3[0].name;

你可以这样问:

var part1name = someObject["part1"]["name"];
var part2quantity = someObject["part2"]["qty"];
var part3name1 =  someObject["part3"][0]["name"];

这两种方法都可行

也许这是你自找的

var partName = "part1";
var nameStr = "name";

var part1name = someObject[partName][nameStr];

终于轮到你自找麻烦了

var partName = "part1.name";

var partBits = partName.split(".");

var part1name = someObject[partBits[0]][partBits[1]];

使用对象扫描，这就变成了一行。然而，更重要的是，这个解决方案考虑性能:

在搜索期间遍历一次输入(即使查询了多个键) 解析只在init上发生一次(如果查询多个对象) 允许使用*进行扩展语法

// const objectScan = require('object-scan'); const someObject = { part1: { name: 'Part 1', size: '20', qty: '50' }, part2: { name: 'Part 2', size: '15', qty: '60' }, part3: [{ name: 'Part 3A', size: '10', qty: '20' }, { name: 'Part 3B', size: '5', qty: '20' }, { name: 'Part 3C', size: '7.5', qty: '20' }] }; const get = (haystack, needle) => objectScan([needle], { rtn: 'value', abort: true })(haystack); console.log(get(someObject, 'part1.name')); // => Part 1 console.log(get(someObject, 'part2.qty')); // => 60 console.log(get(someObject, 'part3[0].name')); // => Part 3A const getAll = (haystack, ...needles) => objectScan(needles, { reverse: false, rtn: 'entry', joined: true })(haystack); console.log(getAll(someObject, 'part1.name', 'part2.qty', 'part3[0].name')); /* => [ [ 'part1.name', 'Part 1' ], [ 'part2.qty', '60' ], [ 'part3[0].name', 'Part 3A' ] ] */ console.log(getAll(someObject, 'part1.*')); /* => [ [ 'part1.name', 'Part 1' ], [ 'part1.size', '20' ], [ 'part1.qty', '50' ] ] */ .as-console-wrapper {max-height: 100% !important; top: 0} <script src="https://bundle.run/object-scan@13.8.0"></script>

声明:我是object-scan的作者

我的解决方案是基于@AdrianoSpadoni给出的，并解决了克隆对象的需要

function generateData(object: any, path: string, value: any): object {
  const clone = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(object));
  path
    .split(".")
    .reduce(
    (o, p, i) => (o[p] = path.split(".").length === ++i ? value : o[p] || {}),
  clone
);
  return clone;
}

如果你需要访问不同的嵌套键，而不知道它在编码时(这将是微不足道的)，你可以使用数组符号访问器:

var part1name = someObject['part1']['name'];
var part2quantity = someObject['part2']['qty'];
var part3name1 =  someObject['part3'][0]['name'];

它们等价于点符号访问器，并且可能在运行时发生变化，例如:

var part = 'part1';
var property = 'name';

var part1name = someObject[part][property];

等于

var part1name = someObject['part1']['name'];

or

var part1name = someObject.part1.name;

我希望这能解决你的问题…

EDIT

我不会使用字符串来维护某种xpath查询来访问对象值。 因为你必须调用一个函数来解析查询和检索值，我会遵循另一条路径(不是:

var part1name = function(){ return this.part1.name; }
var part2quantity = function() { return this['part2']['qty']; }
var part3name1 =  function() { return this.part3[0]['name'];}

// usage: part1name.apply(someObject);

或者，如果你不习惯apply方法

var part1name = function(obj){ return obj.part1.name; }
var part2quantity = function(obj) { return obj['part2']['qty']; }
var part3name1 =  function(obj) { return obj.part3[0]['name'];}

// usage: part1name(someObject);

函数更短，更清晰，解释器会为你检查语法错误等等。

顺便说一下，我觉得在适当的时候做一个简单的任务就足够了……