你无法阻止别人破解你的软件。

However, you can make them create cracks that will hurt your sales less. Keygenerators that can issue a valid registration code for your software are much worse than simple patches that remove registration incentives from your software. That's because a crack will work for one software version only, and will cease to work with the next software update you release. The keygenerator will continue to work until you change your registration key algorithm and that's something you don't want to do often because it will put off your honest clients.

因此，如果您正在寻找一种方法来对抗非法的密钥生成器，并且您不想使用不对称加密，因为这会生成很长的注册码，您可以看看部分密钥验证。

Partial Key Verification makes sure that each illegal keygenerator works only for one particular release of your software. Basically what you do is to make sure that each release of your software only links with the code for checking SOME digits of the registration code. Which digits exactly is random, so crackers would have to reverse engineer many different versions of your software and combine all this into one keygenerator in order to release a keygenerator that works for all versions of your software.

如果你定期发布新的软件版本，这将导致大量的密钥生成器散布在各种软件盗版档案中，这些文件不再工作。潜在的软件盗版者通常会寻找最新版本的破解或关键元素，所以他们可能会尝试其中的一些，并最终放弃。

我在我的(c++)新共享游戏中使用了部分密钥验证，它非常有效。之前我们遇到了很多无法对抗的关键生成器问题。后来出现了许多漏洞，一些按键生成器只适用于特定版本的游戏，但没有一个按键生成器适用于所有版本。我们定期发布游戏的小更新，让之前存在的所有漏洞都变得无用。

似乎有一个用于部分密钥验证的开源。net框架，尽管我还没有尝试过。

坦率地说，有时我们需要混淆代码(例如，注册许可类等)。在这种情况下，您的项目不是免费的。在我看来，你应该花钱买个好东西。

Dotfuscator隐藏代码，. net Reflector在尝试反编译时显示错误。

Here's one idea: you could have a server hosted by your company that all instances of your software need to connect to. Simply having them connect and verify a registration key is not sufficient -- they'll just remove the check. In addition to the key check, you need to also have the server perform some vital task that the client can't perform itself, so it's impossible to remove. This of course would probably mean a lot of heavy processing on the part of your server, but it would make your software difficult to steal, and assuming you have a good key scheme (check ownership, etc), the keys will also be difficult to steal. This is probably more invasive than you want, since it will require your users to be connected to the internet to use your software.

混淆代码!在混淆c#代码中有一个例子。

请记住，99%以上的用户不会有兴趣检查你的可执行文件，看看它是如何工作的。

考虑到很少有人会去尝试，而且大多数混淆器都是可以解决的，它值得你花时间和精力吗?

你最好把时间投入到改进你的产品上，让更多人愿意使用它。

广义上讲，有三种人。

Those who will not buy your software and resort to cracks, or if they don't find any, not use your software at all. Don't expect to make any money from this group. They rely either on their own skills or on crackers (who tend to prioritize their time depending on your useful and how big your audience is. The more useful, the sooner a crack will be available). The group of legitimate users who will buy (pay for) your software, irrespective of what protection mechanism you use. Don't make life hard for your legitimate users by using an elaborate protection mechanism since they are going to pay for it in any case. A complex protection mechanism can easily spoil the user experience and you don't want this happening to this group. Personally, I'd vote against any hardware solution, which adds to the cost of your software. A minority who will resort to "unethical" cracking and will only pay for your software because its features are protected by a licensing mechanism. You probably don't want to make it exceedingly easy for this group to circumvent your protection. However, all that effort you spend on protecting your software will pay back, depending on how big this group of people is. This entirely depends on the type of software you're building.

根据您所说的，如果您认为有足够多的少数人可以被推动购买您的软件，那么请继续执行某种形式的保护。考虑一下你能从这些少数人身上赚到多少钱，与你花在保护上的时间相比，或者你花在第三方保护API/工具上的钱。

如果您想实现自己的解决方案，那么使用公钥加密是防止容易被黑客攻击的好方法(与对称算法相反)。例如，您可以对您的许可证(序列号或许可证文件)进行数字签名。解决这个问题的唯一方法就是反编译、修改和重新编译代码(你可以使用Simucal回答中建议的技术来增加难度)。