如何使一个Python类序列化?
class FileItem:
def __init__(self, fname):
self.fname = fname
尝试序列化为JSON:
>>> import json
>>> x = FileItem('/foo/bar')
>>> json.dumps(x)
TypeError: Object of type 'FileItem' is not JSON serializable
如何使一个Python类序列化?
class FileItem:
def __init__(self, fname):
self.fname = fname
尝试序列化为JSON:
>>> import json
>>> x = FileItem('/foo/bar')
>>> json.dumps(x)
TypeError: Object of type 'FileItem' is not JSON serializable
当前回答
如果你不介意为它安装一个包,你可以使用json-tricks:
pip install json-tricks
之后,你只需要从json_tricks导入dump(s)而不是json,它通常会工作:
from json_tricks import dumps
json_str = dumps(cls_instance, indent=4)
这将给
{
"__instance_type__": [
"module_name.test_class",
"MyTestCls"
],
"attributes": {
"attr": "val",
"dct_attr": {
"hello": 42
}
}
}
基本上就是这样!
这在一般情况下会很有效。有一些例外,例如,如果特殊的事情发生在__new__中,或者更多的元类魔法正在发生。
显然加载也可以(否则有什么意义):
from json_tricks import loads
json_str = loads(json_str)
这确实假设module_name.test_class。MyTestCls可以导入,并且没有以不兼容的方式进行更改。您将返回一个实例,而不是某个字典或其他东西,它应该是您转储的实例的相同副本。
如果你想自定义一些东西是如何(反)序列化的,你可以添加特殊的方法到你的类,像这样:
class CustomEncodeCls:
def __init__(self):
self.relevant = 42
self.irrelevant = 37
def __json_encode__(self):
# should return primitive, serializable types like dict, list, int, string, float...
return {'relevant': self.relevant}
def __json_decode__(self, **attrs):
# should initialize all properties; note that __init__ is not called implicitly
self.relevant = attrs['relevant']
self.irrelevant = 12
其中仅序列化部分属性参数,作为示例。
作为免费的奖励,你可以获得numpy数组、日期和时间、有序地图的(反)序列化,以及在json中包含注释的能力。
免责声明:我创建了json_tricks,因为我遇到了与您相同的问题。
其他回答
正如在许多其他答案中提到的,您可以将函数传递给json。转储将不是默认支持的类型之一的对象转换为受支持的类型。令人惊讶的是,他们都没有提到最简单的情况,即使用内置函数vars将对象转换为包含其所有属性的dict:
json.dumps(obj, default=vars)
注意,这只涵盖了基本的情况,如果你需要对某些类型进行更具体的序列化(例如排除某些属性或没有__dict__属性的对象),你需要使用自定义函数或JSONEncoder,如其他答案中所述。
我有了自己的解决办法。使用此方法,将任何文档(字典、列表、ObjectId等)传递给序列化。
def getSerializable(doc):
# check if it's a list
if isinstance(doc, list):
for i, val in enumerate(doc):
doc[i] = getSerializable(doc[i])
return doc
# check if it's a dict
if isinstance(doc, dict):
for key in doc.keys():
doc[key] = getSerializable(doc[key])
return doc
# Process ObjectId
if isinstance(doc, ObjectId):
doc = str(doc)
return doc
# Use any other custom serializting stuff here...
# For the rest of stuff
return doc
import json
class Foo(object):
def __init__(self):
self.bar = 'baz'
self._qux = 'flub'
def somemethod(self):
pass
def default(instance):
return {k: v
for k, v in vars(instance).items()
if not str(k).startswith('_')}
json_foo = json.dumps(Foo(), default=default)
assert '{"bar": "baz"}' == json_foo
print(json_foo)
下面是一个简单功能的简单解决方案:
.toJSON()方法
实现一个序列化器方法,而不是一个JSON可序列化类:
import json
class Object:
def toJSON(self):
return json.dumps(self, default=lambda o: o.__dict__,
sort_keys=True, indent=4)
所以你只需调用它来序列化:
me = Object()
me.name = "Onur"
me.age = 35
me.dog = Object()
me.dog.name = "Apollo"
print(me.toJSON())
将输出:
{
"age": 35,
"dog": {
"name": "Apollo"
},
"name": "Onur"
}
基于Quinten Cabo的回答:
def sterilize(obj):
"""Make an object more ameniable to dumping as json
"""
if type(obj) in (str, float, int, bool, type(None)):
return obj
elif isinstance(obj, dict):
return {k: sterilize(v) for k, v in obj.items()}
list_ret = []
dict_ret = {}
for a in dir(obj):
if a == '__iter__' and callable(obj.__iter__):
list_ret.extend([sterilize(v) for v in obj])
elif a == '__dict__':
dict_ret.update({k: sterilize(v) for k, v in obj.__dict__.items() if k not in ['__module__', '__dict__', '__weakref__', '__doc__']})
elif a not in ['__doc__', '__module__']:
aval = getattr(obj, a)
if type(aval) in (str, float, int, bool, type(None)):
dict_ret[a] = aval
elif a != '__class__' and a != '__objclass__' and isinstance(aval, type):
dict_ret[a] = sterilize(aval)
if len(list_ret) == 0:
if len(dict_ret) == 0:
return repr(obj)
return dict_ret
else:
if len(dict_ret) == 0:
return list_ret
return (list_ret, dict_ret)
区别在于
Works for any iterable instead of just list and tuple (it works for NumPy arrays, etc.) Works for dynamic types (ones that contain a __dict__). Includes native types float and None so they don't get converted to string. Classes that have __dict__ and members will mostly work (if the __dict__ and member names collide, you will only get one - likely the member) Classes that are lists and have members will look like a tuple of the list and a dictionary Python3 (that isinstance() call may be the only thing that needs changing)