考虑到: (x1, x2) (y1, y2) 那么x1 <= y2 || x2 >= y1总是成立的。 作为

      x1 ... x2
y1 .... y2

如果是x1 > y2，那么它们不重叠 或

x1 ... x2
    y1 ... y2

如果x2 < y1，它们不重叠。

重叠(X, Y):= if (X1 <= Y1) then (Y1 <= X2) else (X1 <= Y2)。

证明:

考虑X在Y之前或与Y左对齐的情况，即X1 <= Y1。那么Y要么在X内部开始，要么在X的末尾开始，即Y1 <= X2;或者Y远离x，第一个条件是重叠;第二个，不是。

在互补的情况下，Y在X之前，同样的逻辑适用于交换的实体。

So,

重叠(X, Y):= if (X1 <= Y) then (Y1 <= X2) else重叠(Y, X)。

但这似乎并不完全正确。在递归调用中，第一个测试是多余的，因为我们已经从第一个调用的第一个测试中知道了实体的相对位置。因此，我们实际上只需要测试第二个条件，即交换后(X1 <= Y2)。所以,

重叠(X, Y):= if (X1 <= Y1) then (Y1 <= X2) else (X1 <= Y2)。

QED.

Ada的实现:

   type Range_T is array (1 .. 2) of Integer;

   function Overlap (X, Y: Range_T) return Boolean is
     (if X(1) <= Y(1) then Y(1) <= X(2) else X(1) <= Y(2));

测试程序:

with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;

procedure Main is

   type Range_T is array (1 .. 2) of Integer;

   function Overlap (X, Y: Range_T) return Boolean is
     (if X(1) <= Y(1) then Y(1) <= X(2) else X(1) <= Y(2));

   function Img (X: Range_T) return String is
     (" [" & X(1)'Img & X(2)'Img & " ] ");

   procedure Test (X, Y: Range_T; Expect: Boolean) is
      B: Boolean := Overlap (X, Y);
   begin
      Put_Line
        (Img (X) & " and " & Img (Y) &
         (if B then " overlap .......... "
               else " do not overlap ... ") &
         (if B = Expect then "PASS" else "FAIL"));
   end;
         
begin
   Test ( (1, 2), (2, 3), True);  --  chained
   Test ( (2, 3), (1, 2), True);

   Test ( (4, 9), (5, 7), True);  --  inside
   Test ( (5, 7), (4, 9), True);

   Test ( (1, 5), (3, 7), True);  --  proper overlap
   Test ( (3, 7), (1, 5), True);

   Test ( (1, 2), (3, 4), False);  -- back to back
   Test ( (3, 4), (1, 2), False);

   Test ( (1, 2), (5, 7), False);  -- disjoint
   Test ( (5, 7), (1, 2), False);
end;

以上程序输出:

 [ 1 2 ]  and  [ 2 3 ]  overlap .......... PASS
 [ 2 3 ]  and  [ 1 2 ]  overlap .......... PASS
 [ 4 9 ]  and  [ 5 7 ]  overlap .......... PASS
 [ 5 7 ]  and  [ 4 9 ]  overlap .......... PASS
 [ 1 5 ]  and  [ 3 7 ]  overlap .......... PASS
 [ 3 7 ]  and  [ 1 5 ]  overlap .......... PASS
 [ 1 2 ]  and  [ 3 4 ]  do not overlap ... PASS
 [ 3 4 ]  and  [ 1 2 ]  do not overlap ... PASS
 [ 1 2 ]  and  [ 5 7 ]  do not overlap ... PASS
 [ 5 7 ]  and  [ 1 2 ]  do not overlap ... PASS

你已经有了最有效的表示——这是需要检查的最小值，除非你确定x1 < x2等，然后使用其他人提供的解决方案。

你可能应该注意到，一些编译器实际上会为你优化它——只要这4个表达式中的任何一个返回true就返回。如果其中一个返回true，那么最终结果也会返回true——因此可以跳过其他检查。

我的情况不同。我要检查两个时间范围是否重叠。不应该有单位时间的重叠。这里是Go的实现。

    func CheckRange(as, ae, bs, be int) bool {
    return (as >= be) != (ae > bs)
    }

测试用例

if CheckRange(2, 8, 2, 4) != true {
        t.Error("Expected 2,8,2,4 to equal TRUE")
    }

    if CheckRange(2, 8, 2, 4) != true {
        t.Error("Expected 2,8,2,4 to equal TRUE")
    }

    if CheckRange(2, 8, 6, 9) != true {
        t.Error("Expected 2,8,6,9 to equal TRUE")
    }

    if CheckRange(2, 8, 8, 9) != false {
        t.Error("Expected 2,8,8,9 to equal FALSE")
    }

    if CheckRange(2, 8, 4, 6) != true {
        t.Error("Expected 2,8,4,6 to equal TRUE")
    }

    if CheckRange(2, 8, 1, 9) != true {
        t.Error("Expected 2,8,1,9 to equal TRUE")
    }

    if CheckRange(4, 8, 1, 3) != false {
        t.Error("Expected 4,8,1,3 to equal FALSE")
    }

    if CheckRange(4, 8, 1, 4) != false {
        t.Error("Expected 4,8,1,4 to equal FALSE")
    }

    if CheckRange(2, 5, 6, 9) != false {
        t.Error("Expected 2,5,6,9 to equal FALSE")
    }

    if CheckRange(2, 5, 5, 9) != false {
        t.Error("Expected 2,5,5,9 to equal FALSE")
    }

你可以在边界比较中看到异或模式

以下是我的看法:

int xmin = min(x1,x2)
  , xmax = max(x1,x2)
  , ymin = min(y1,y2)
  , ymax = max(y1,y2);

for (int i = xmin; i < xmax; ++i)
    if (ymin <= i && i <= ymax)
        return true;

return false;

除非您正在对数十亿个宽间距整数运行一些高性能的范围检查器，否则我们的版本应该执行类似的操作。我的观点是，这是微观优化。

如果你正在处理，给定两个范围[x1:x2]和[y1:y2]，自然/反自然顺序范围同时存在:

自然顺序:x1 <= x2 && y1 <= y2或 反自然顺序:x1 >= x2 && y1 >= y2

然后你可能想用这个来检查:

它们重叠<=> (y2 - x1) * (x2 - y1) >= 0

其中只涉及四个操作:

2倍 一个乘法 一个比较