You are probably not going to like this - all I can say in its favour is that it works for me, and I have similar but not identical requirements: I am writing a compiler/transpiler for a 1970's Algol-like language which uses C as it's output and then compiles the C so that as far as the user is concerned, they're generally not aware of C being involved, so although you might call it a transpiler, it's effectively a compiler that uses C as it's intermediate code. The language being compiled has a history of providing good diagnostics and a full backtrace in the original native compilers. I've been able to find gcc compiler flags and libraries etc that allow me to trap most of the runtime errors that the original compilers did (although with one glaring exception - unassigned variable trapping). When a runtime error occurs (eg arithmetic overflow, divide by zero, array index out of bounds, etc) the original compilers output a backtrace to the console listing all variables in the stack frames of every active procedure call. I struggled to get this effect in C, but eventually did so with what can only be described as a hack... When the program is invoked, the wrapper that supplies the C "main" looks at its argv, and if a special option is not present, it restarts itself under gdb with an altered argv containing both gdb options and the 'magic' option string for the program itself. This restarted version then hides those strings from the user's code by restoring the original arguments before calling the main block of the code written in our language. When an error occurs (as long as it is not one explicitly trapped within the program by user code), it exits to gdb which prints the required backtrace.

启动序列中的关键代码行包括:

  if ((argc >= 1) && (strcmp(origargv[argc-1], "--restarting-under-gdb")) != 0) {
    // initial invocation
    // the "--restarting-under-gdb" option is how the copy running under gdb knows
    // not to start another gdb process.

and

  char *gdb [] = {
    "/usr/bin/gdb", "-q", "-batch", "-nx", "-nh", "-return-child-result",
    "-ex", "run",
    "-ex", "bt full",
    "--args"
  };

The original arguments are appended to the gdb options above. That should be enough of a hint for you to do something similar for your own system. I did look at other library-supported backtrace options (eg libbacktrace, https://codingrelic.geekhold.com/2010/09/gcc-function-instrumentation.html, etc) but they only output the procedure call stack, not the local variables. However if anyone knows of any cleaner mechanism to get a similar effect, do please let us know. The main downside to this is that the variables are printed in C syntax, not the syntax of the language the user writes in. And (until I add suitable #line directives on every generated line of C :-() the backtrace lists the C source file and line numbers.

G PS我使用的gcc编译选项是:

 GCCOPTS=" -Wall -Wno-return-type -Wno-comment -g -fsanitize=undefined
 -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error -fno-sanitize-recover=all -frecord-gcc-switches
 -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow -ftrapv
 -grecord-gcc-switches -O0 -ggdb3 "

如果你仍然想像我一样独自去做，你可以链接到bfd，避免使用addr2line，就像我在这里所做的:

https://github.com/gnif/LookingGlass/blob/master/common/src/platform/linux/crash.c

这将产生输出:

[E]        crash.linux.c:170  | crit_err_hdlr                  | ==== FATAL CRASH (a12-151-g28b12c85f4+1) ====
[E]        crash.linux.c:171  | crit_err_hdlr                  | signal 11 (Segmentation fault), address is (nil)
[E]        crash.linux.c:194  | crit_err_hdlr                  | [trace]: (0) /home/geoff/Projects/LookingGlass/client/src/main.c:936 (register_key_binds)
[E]        crash.linux.c:194  | crit_err_hdlr                  | [trace]: (1) /home/geoff/Projects/LookingGlass/client/src/main.c:1069 (run)
[E]        crash.linux.c:194  | crit_err_hdlr                  | [trace]: (2) /home/geoff/Projects/LookingGlass/client/src/main.c:1314 (main)
[E]        crash.linux.c:199  | crit_err_hdlr                  | [trace]: (3) /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xeb) [0x7f8aa65f809b]
[E]        crash.linux.c:199  | crit_err_hdlr                  | [trace]: (4) ./looking-glass-client(_start+0x2a) [0x55c70fc4aeca]

需要注意的是，一旦生成了核心文件，就需要使用gdb工具来查看它。为了让gdb理解你的核心文件，你必须告诉gcc用调试符号来检测二进制文件:要做到这一点，你需要使用-g标志进行编译:

$ g++ -g prog.cpp -o prog

然后，您可以设置“ulimit -c unlimited”来转储一个核心，或者只是在gdb中运行您的程序。我更喜欢第二种方法:

$ gdb ./prog
... gdb startup output ...
(gdb) run
... program runs and crashes ...
(gdb) where
... gdb outputs your stack trace ...

我希望这能有所帮助。

Ulimit -c <value>设置unix上的核心文件大小限制。缺省情况下，内核文件大小限制为0。可以使用ulimit -a查看ulimit值。

此外，如果您从gdb内部运行程序，它将在“分段违规”(SIGSEGV，通常当您访问未分配的内存块时)时停止程序，或者您可以设置断点。

DDD和nemiver是GDB的前端，这使得新手更容易使用GDB。

除了上面的答案，这里还介绍了如何让Debian Linux操作系统生成核心转储

Create a “coredumps” folder in the user's home folder Go to /etc/security/limits.conf. Below the ' ' line, type “ soft core unlimited”, and “root soft core unlimited” if enabling core dumps for root, to allow unlimited space for core dumps. NOTE: “* soft core unlimited” does not cover root, which is why root has to be specified in its own line. To check these values, log out, log back in, and type “ulimit -a”. “Core file size” should be set to unlimited. Check the .bashrc files (user, and root if applicable) to make sure that ulimit is not set there. Otherwise, the value above will be overwritten on startup. Open /etc/sysctl.conf. Enter the following at the bottom: “kernel.core_pattern = /home//coredumps/%e_%t.dump”. (%e will be the process name, and %t will be the system time) Exit and type “sysctl -p” to load the new configuration Check /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern and verify that this matches what you just typed in. Core dumping can be tested by running a process on the command line (“ &”), and then killing it with “kill -11 ”. If core dumping is successful, you will see “(core dumped)” after the segmentation fault indication.

* nix: 你可以拦截SIGSEGV(通常这个信号是在崩溃之前发出的)，并将信息保存到一个文件中。(除了可以使用GDB进行调试的核心文件之外)。

赢得: 从msdn检查这个。

你也可以看看谷歌的chrome代码，看看它是如何处理崩溃的。它有一个很好的异常处理机制。