我忘记了GNOME的“apport”技术，但我不太了解如何使用它。它用于生成堆栈跟踪和其他用于处理的诊断，并可以自动归档错误。这当然值得一看。

如果你仍然想像我一样独自去做，你可以链接到bfd，避免使用addr2line，就像我在这里所做的:

https://github.com/gnif/LookingGlass/blob/master/common/src/platform/linux/crash.c

这将产生输出:

[E]        crash.linux.c:170  | crit_err_hdlr                  | ==== FATAL CRASH (a12-151-g28b12c85f4+1) ====
[E]        crash.linux.c:171  | crit_err_hdlr                  | signal 11 (Segmentation fault), address is (nil)
[E]        crash.linux.c:194  | crit_err_hdlr                  | [trace]: (0) /home/geoff/Projects/LookingGlass/client/src/main.c:936 (register_key_binds)
[E]        crash.linux.c:194  | crit_err_hdlr                  | [trace]: (1) /home/geoff/Projects/LookingGlass/client/src/main.c:1069 (run)
[E]        crash.linux.c:194  | crit_err_hdlr                  | [trace]: (2) /home/geoff/Projects/LookingGlass/client/src/main.c:1314 (main)
[E]        crash.linux.c:199  | crit_err_hdlr                  | [trace]: (3) /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xeb) [0x7f8aa65f809b]
[E]        crash.linux.c:199  | crit_err_hdlr                  | [trace]: (4) ./looking-glass-client(_start+0x2a) [0x55c70fc4aeca]

参见ACE(自适应通信环境)中的堆栈跟踪功能。它已经被编写为涵盖所有主要平台(以及更多)。这个库是bsd风格授权的，所以如果你不想使用ACE，你甚至可以复制/粘贴代码。

You are probably not going to like this - all I can say in its favour is that it works for me, and I have similar but not identical requirements: I am writing a compiler/transpiler for a 1970's Algol-like language which uses C as it's output and then compiles the C so that as far as the user is concerned, they're generally not aware of C being involved, so although you might call it a transpiler, it's effectively a compiler that uses C as it's intermediate code. The language being compiled has a history of providing good diagnostics and a full backtrace in the original native compilers. I've been able to find gcc compiler flags and libraries etc that allow me to trap most of the runtime errors that the original compilers did (although with one glaring exception - unassigned variable trapping). When a runtime error occurs (eg arithmetic overflow, divide by zero, array index out of bounds, etc) the original compilers output a backtrace to the console listing all variables in the stack frames of every active procedure call. I struggled to get this effect in C, but eventually did so with what can only be described as a hack... When the program is invoked, the wrapper that supplies the C "main" looks at its argv, and if a special option is not present, it restarts itself under gdb with an altered argv containing both gdb options and the 'magic' option string for the program itself. This restarted version then hides those strings from the user's code by restoring the original arguments before calling the main block of the code written in our language. When an error occurs (as long as it is not one explicitly trapped within the program by user code), it exits to gdb which prints the required backtrace.

启动序列中的关键代码行包括:

  if ((argc >= 1) && (strcmp(origargv[argc-1], "--restarting-under-gdb")) != 0) {
    // initial invocation
    // the "--restarting-under-gdb" option is how the copy running under gdb knows
    // not to start another gdb process.

and

  char *gdb [] = {
    "/usr/bin/gdb", "-q", "-batch", "-nx", "-nh", "-return-child-result",
    "-ex", "run",
    "-ex", "bt full",
    "--args"
  };

The original arguments are appended to the gdb options above. That should be enough of a hint for you to do something similar for your own system. I did look at other library-supported backtrace options (eg libbacktrace, https://codingrelic.geekhold.com/2010/09/gcc-function-instrumentation.html, etc) but they only output the procedure call stack, not the local variables. However if anyone knows of any cleaner mechanism to get a similar effect, do please let us know. The main downside to this is that the variables are printed in C syntax, not the syntax of the language the user writes in. And (until I add suitable #line directives on every generated line of C :-() the backtrace lists the C source file and line numbers.

G PS我使用的gcc编译选项是:

 GCCOPTS=" -Wall -Wno-return-type -Wno-comment -g -fsanitize=undefined
 -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error -fno-sanitize-recover=all -frecord-gcc-switches
 -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow -ftrapv
 -grecord-gcc-switches -O0 -ggdb3 "

它看起来就像在最后一个c++增强版本中出现的库提供了你想要的东西，可能代码会是多平台的。 它是boost::stacktrace，你可以像在boost sample中那样使用:

#include <filesystem>
#include <sstream>
#include <fstream>
#include <signal.h>     // ::signal, ::raise
#include <boost/stacktrace.hpp>

const char* backtraceFileName = "./backtraceFile.dump";

void signalHandler(int)
{
    ::signal(SIGSEGV, SIG_DFL);
    ::signal(SIGABRT, SIG_DFL);
    boost::stacktrace::safe_dump_to(backtraceFileName);
    ::raise(SIGABRT);
}

void sendReport()
{
    if (std::filesystem::exists(backtraceFileName))
    {
        std::ifstream file(backtraceFileName);

        auto st = boost::stacktrace::stacktrace::from_dump(file);
        std::ostringstream backtraceStream;
        backtraceStream << st << std::endl;

        // sending the code from st

        file.close();
        std::filesystem::remove(backtraceFileName);
    }
}

int main()
{
    ::signal(SIGSEGV, signalHandler);
    ::signal(SIGABRT, signalHandler);

    sendReport();
    // ... rest of code
}

在Linux中编译上面的代码:

g++ --std=c++17 file.cpp -lstdc++fs -lboost_stacktrace_backtrace -ldl -lbacktrace

从boost文档复制的反向跟踪示例:

0# bar(int) at /path/to/source/file.cpp:70
1# bar(int) at /path/to/source/file.cpp:70
2# bar(int) at /path/to/source/file.cpp:70
3# bar(int) at /path/to/source/file.cpp:70
4# main at /path/to/main.cpp:93
5# __libc_start_main in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
6# _start

城里的新国王来了 https://github.com/bombela/backward-cpp

在代码中放置1个头文件，安装1个库。

我个人使用这个函数来调用它

#include "backward.hpp"
void stacker() {

using namespace backward;
StackTrace st;


st.load_here(99); //Limit the number of trace depth to 99
st.skip_n_firsts(3);//This will skip some backward internal function from the trace

Printer p;
p.snippet = true;
p.object = true;
p.color = true;
p.address = true;
p.print(st, stderr);
}