我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts,但是像在Perl中一样,我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法,这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面,这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情,但使用getopts,我还不能实现这些?
我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts,但是像在Perl中一样,我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法,这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面,这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情,但使用getopts,我还不能实现这些?
当前回答
长选项可以被内置的标准getopts作为- " option "的"参数"解析。
这是可移植的本地POSIX shell -不需要外部程序或bashisms。
本指南将长选项作为-选项的参数实现,因此——alpha被getopts视为参数alpha为-,而——bravo=foo被参数bravo=foo视为-。true实参通过shell参数展开获取,更新$OPT和$OPTARG。
在本例中,-b和-c(以及它们的长形式——bravo和——charlie)具有强制实参。长选项的参数出现在等号之后,例如——bravo=foo(长选项的空格分隔符很难实现,参见下文)。
因为它使用了内置的getopts,所以这个解决方案支持像cmd——bravo=foo -ac FILE这样的用法(它组合了选项-a和-c,并将长选项与标准选项交织在一起),而这里的大多数其他答案要么很难做到,要么无法做到这一点。
die() { echo "$*" >&2; exit 2; } # complain to STDERR and exit with error
needs_arg() { if [ -z "$OPTARG" ]; then die "No arg for --$OPT option"; fi; }
while getopts ab:c:-: OPT; do
# support long options: https://stackoverflow.com/a/28466267/519360
if [ "$OPT" = "-" ]; then # long option: reformulate OPT and OPTARG
OPT="${OPTARG%%=*}" # extract long option name
OPTARG="${OPTARG#$OPT}" # extract long option argument (may be empty)
OPTARG="${OPTARG#=}" # if long option argument, remove assigning `=`
fi
case "$OPT" in
a | alpha ) alpha=true ;;
b | bravo ) needs_arg; bravo="$OPTARG" ;;
c | charlie ) needs_arg; charlie="$OPTARG" ;;
??* ) die "Illegal option --$OPT" ;; # bad long option
? ) exit 2 ;; # bad short option (error reported via getopts)
esac
done
shift $((OPTIND-1)) # remove parsed options and args from $@ list
When the option is a dash (-), it is a long option. getopts will have parsed the actual long option into $OPTARG, e.g. --bravo=foo originally sets OPT='-' and OPTARG='bravo=foo'. The if stanza sets $OPT to the contents of $OPTARG before the first equals sign (bravo in our example) and then removes that from the beginning of $OPTARG (yielding =foo in this step, or an empty string if there is no =). Finally, we strip the argument's leading =. At this point, $OPT is either a short option (one character) or a long option (2+ characters).
The case then matches either short or long options (the pipe, |, indicates that "or" operation. A long-only option like delta ) delta=true ;; doesn't need a pipe). For short options, getopts automatically complains about options and missing arguments, so we have to replicate those manually using the needs_arg function, which fatally exits when $OPTARG is empty. The ??* condition will match any remaining long option (? matches a single character and * matches zero or more, so ??* matches 2+ characters), allowing us to issue the "Illegal option" error before exiting.
与正常的gnu风格的长选项一样,提供——将停止解析,因此- -- --bravo=4将把$alpha设置为true,但$bravo将保持不变,$1将-bravo=4。我不能说我建议用前导破折号来命名文件,但这是表示它们不是选项的方法。
小错误:如果有人给出了一个无效的单字符长选项(它也不是一个短选项),这将退出一个错误,但没有消息(这个实现假设它是一个短选项)。您可以在case之前的条件中使用一个额外的变量来跟踪它,然后在最后的case条件中测试它,但我认为这是一个太麻烦的角落情况。
大写变量名:一般情况下,建议保留全大写变量供系统使用。我将$OPT保留为全大写,以与$OPTARG保持一致,但这确实打破了这种约定。我认为这很合适,因为这是系统应该做的事情,它应该是安全的;我还没有听说过任何使用这个变量名的标准。
要抱怨长选项的非预期实参:用翻转测试模拟needs_argg来抱怨一个非预期实参:
no_arg() { if [ -n "$OPTARG" ]; then die "No arg allowed for --$OPT option"; fi; }
要接受带空格分隔参数的长选项:您可以用eval "ARG_B=\"\$$OPTIND\""(或使用bash的间接展开,ARG_B="${!OPTIND}")拉入下一个参数,然后增加$OPTIND,正如这个答案的旧版本所指出的那样,但它不可靠;getopts可以过早地终止,假设参数超出了它的作用域,并且一些实现不太适合手动操作$OPTIND。
其他回答
我只是偶尔写一些shell脚本,但没有实践经验,所以任何反馈都很感激。
使用@Arvid Requate提出的策略,我们注意到一些用户错误。忘记包含值的用户会意外地将下一个选项的名称视为值:
./getopts_test.sh --loglevel= --toc=TRUE
将导致"loglevel"的值被视为"——toc=TRUE"。这可以 被避免的。
我从http://mwiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/035关于手动解析的讨论中改编了一些关于检查CLI用户错误的想法。我在处理"-"和"——"参数时插入了错误检查。
然后我开始摆弄语法,所以这里的任何错误都是我的错,而不是原始作者的错。
我的方法可以帮助那些喜欢输入带等号或不带等号的长字符的用户。也就是说,它对“——loglevel 9”的响应应该与“——loglevel=9”的响应相同。在——/space方法中,不可能确定用户是否忘记了一个参数,因此需要进行一些猜测。
如果用户使用长/等号格式(——opt=),则=后的空格会触发错误,因为没有提供参数。 如果user有长/空格参数(——opt),如果后面没有参数(命令结束)或参数以破折号开头,该脚本将导致失败。
In case you are starting out on this, there is an interesting difference between "--opt=value" and "--opt value" formats. With the equal sign, the command line argument is seen as "opt=value" and the work to handle that is string parsing, to separate at the "=". In contrast, with "--opt value", the name of the argument is "opt" and we have the challenge of getting the next value supplied in the command line. That's where @Arvid Requate used ${!OPTIND}, the indirect reference. I still don't understand that, well, at all, and comments in BashFAQ seem to warn against that style (http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/006). BTW, I don't think previous poster's comments about importance of OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) are correct. I mean to say, I see no harm from omitting it.
在该脚本的最新版本中,flag -v表示详细打印输出。
将其保存在一个名为“cli-5.sh”的文件中,使其可执行,其中任何一个都将以预期的方式工作或失败
./cli-5.sh -v --loglevel=44 --toc TRUE
./cli-5.sh -v --loglevel=44 --toc=TRUE
./cli-5.sh --loglevel 7
./cli-5.sh --loglevel=8
./cli-5.sh -l9
./cli-5.sh --toc FALSE --loglevel=77
./cli-5.sh --toc=FALSE --loglevel=77
./cli-5.sh -l99 -t yyy
./cli-5.sh -l 99 -t yyy
下面是对用户intpu进行错误检查的示例输出
$ ./cli-5.sh --toc --loglevel=77
ERROR: toc value must not have dash at beginning
$ ./cli-5.sh --toc= --loglevel=77
ERROR: value for toc undefined
您应该考虑打开-v,因为它会打印OPTIND和OPTARG的内部内容
#/usr/bin/env bash
## Paul Johnson
## 20171016
##
## Combines ideas from
## https://stackoverflow.com/questions/402377/using-getopts-in-bash-shell-script-to-get-long-and-short-command-line-options
## by @Arvid Requate, and http://mwiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/035
# What I don't understand yet:
# In @Arvid REquate's answer, we have
# val="${!OPTIND}"; OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 ))
# this works, but I don't understand it!
die() {
printf '%s\n' "$1" >&2
exit 1
}
printparse(){
if [ ${VERBOSE} -gt 0 ]; then
printf 'Parse: %s%s%s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3" >&2;
fi
}
showme(){
if [ ${VERBOSE} -gt 0 ]; then
printf 'VERBOSE: %s\n' "$1" >&2;
fi
}
VERBOSE=0
loglevel=0
toc="TRUE"
optspec=":vhl:t:-:"
while getopts "$optspec" OPTCHAR; do
showme "OPTARG: ${OPTARG[*]}"
showme "OPTIND: ${OPTIND[*]}"
case "${OPTCHAR}" in
-)
case "${OPTARG}" in
loglevel) #argument has no equal sign
opt=${OPTARG}
val="${!OPTIND}"
## check value. If negative, assume user forgot value
showme "OPTIND is {$OPTIND} {!OPTIND} has value \"${!OPTIND}\""
if [[ "$val" == -* ]]; then
die "ERROR: $opt value must not have dash at beginning"
fi
## OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) # CAUTION! no effect?
printparse "--${OPTARG}" " " "${val}"
loglevel="${val}"
shift
;;
loglevel=*) #argument has equal sign
opt=${OPTARG%=*}
val=${OPTARG#*=}
if [ "${OPTARG#*=}" ]; then
printparse "--${opt}" "=" "${val}"
loglevel="${val}"
## shift CAUTION don't shift this, fails othewise
else
die "ERROR: $opt value must be supplied"
fi
;;
toc) #argument has no equal sign
opt=${OPTARG}
val="${!OPTIND}"
## check value. If negative, assume user forgot value
showme "OPTIND is {$OPTIND} {!OPTIND} has value \"${!OPTIND}\""
if [[ "$val" == -* ]]; then
die "ERROR: $opt value must not have dash at beginning"
fi
## OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) #??
printparse "--${opt}" " " "${val}"
toc="${val}"
shift
;;
toc=*) #argument has equal sign
opt=${OPTARG%=*}
val=${OPTARG#*=}
if [ "${OPTARG#*=}" ]; then
toc=${val}
printparse "--$opt" " -> " "$toc"
##shift ## NO! dont shift this
else
die "ERROR: value for $opt undefined"
fi
;;
help)
echo "usage: $0 [-v] [--loglevel[=]<value>] [--toc[=]<TRUE,FALSE>]" >&2
exit 2
;;
*)
if [ "$OPTERR" = 1 ] && [ "${optspec:0:1}" != ":" ]; then
echo "Unknown option --${OPTARG}" >&2
fi
;;
esac;;
h|-\?|--help)
## must rewrite this for all of the arguments
echo "usage: $0 [-v] [--loglevel[=]<value>] [--toc[=]<TRUE,FALSE>]" >&2
exit 2
;;
l)
loglevel=${OPTARG}
printparse "-l" " " "${loglevel}"
;;
t)
toc=${OPTARG}
;;
v)
VERBOSE=1
;;
*)
if [ "$OPTERR" != 1 ] || [ "${optspec:0:1}" = ":" ]; then
echo "Non-option argument: '-${OPTARG}'" >&2
fi
;;
esac
done
echo "
After Parsing values
"
echo "loglevel $loglevel"
echo "toc $toc"
#!/bin/bash
while getopts "abc:d:" flag
do
case $flag in
a) echo "[getopts:$OPTIND]==> -$flag";;
b) echo "[getopts:$OPTIND]==> -$flag";;
c) echo "[getopts:$OPTIND]==> -$flag $OPTARG";;
d) echo "[getopts:$OPTIND]==> -$flag $OPTARG";;
esac
done
shift $((OPTIND-1))
echo "[otheropts]==> $@"
exit
.
#!/bin/bash
until [ -z "$1" ]; do
case $1 in
"--dlong")
shift
if [ "${1:1:0}" != "-" ]
then
echo "==> dlong $1"
shift
fi;;
*) echo "==> other $1"; shift;;
esac
done
exit
看一下shFlags,它是一个可移植的shell库(意思是:sh, bash, dash, ksh, zsh在Linux, Solaris等上)。
它使得添加新标志就像在脚本中添加一行一样简单,并且它提供了一个自动生成的用法函数。
这是一个简单的Hello, world!使用shFlag:
#!/bin/sh
# source shflags from current directory
. ./shflags
# define a 'name' command-line string flag
DEFINE_string 'name' 'world' 'name to say hello to' 'n'
# parse the command-line
FLAGS "$@" || exit 1
eval set -- "${FLAGS_ARGV}"
# say hello
echo "Hello, ${FLAGS_name}!"
对于具有支持长选项的增强getopt的操作系统(例如Linux),您可以这样做:
$ ./hello_world.sh --name Kate
Hello, Kate!
对于其他情况,您必须使用短选项:
$ ./hello_world.sh -n Kate
Hello, Kate!
添加一个新标志就像添加一个新的DEFINE_调用一样简单。
发明了另一个版本的轮子……
这个函数(希望)是一个posix兼容的普通bourne shell替换GNU getopt。它支持短/长选项,可以接受强制/可选/无参数,并且指定选项的方式几乎与GNU getopt相同,因此转换是微不足道的。
当然,要放入脚本中,这仍然是相当大的代码块,但它大约是众所周知的getopt_long shell函数的一半行数,并且在您只想替换现有的GNU getopt使用的情况下可能更可取。
这是相当新的代码,所以是YMMV(如果因为某种原因它实际上与POSIX不兼容,请务必告诉我——可移植性是一开始的意图,但我没有一个有用的POSIX测试环境)。
代码和示例用法如下:
#!/bin/sh
# posix_getopt shell function
# Author: Phil S.
# Version: 1.0
# Created: 2016-07-05
# URL: http://stackoverflow.com/a/37087374/324105
# POSIX-compatible argument quoting and parameter save/restore
# http://www.etalabs.net/sh_tricks.html
# Usage:
# parameters=$(save "$@") # save the original parameters.
# eval "set -- ${parameters}" # restore the saved parameters.
save () {
local param
for param; do
printf %s\\n "$param" \
| sed "s/'/'\\\\''/g;1s/^/'/;\$s/\$/' \\\\/"
done
printf %s\\n " "
}
# Exit with status $1 after displaying error message $2.
exiterr () {
printf %s\\n "$2" >&2
exit $1
}
# POSIX-compatible command line option parsing.
# This function supports long options and optional arguments, and is
# a (largely-compatible) drop-in replacement for GNU getopt.
#
# Instead of:
# opts=$(getopt -o "$shortopts" -l "$longopts" -- "$@")
# eval set -- ${opts}
#
# We instead use:
# opts=$(posix_getopt "$shortopts" "$longopts" "$@")
# eval "set -- ${opts}"
posix_getopt () { # args: "$shortopts" "$longopts" "$@"
local shortopts longopts \
arg argtype getopt nonopt opt optchar optword suffix
shortopts="$1"
longopts="$2"
shift 2
getopt=
nonopt=
while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
opt=
arg=
argtype=
case "$1" in
# '--' means don't parse the remaining options
( -- ) {
getopt="${getopt}$(save "$@")"
shift $#
break
};;
# process short option
( -[!-]* ) { # -x[foo]
suffix=${1#-?} # foo
opt=${1%$suffix} # -x
optchar=${opt#-} # x
case "${shortopts}" in
( *${optchar}::* ) { # optional argument
argtype=optional
arg="${suffix}"
shift
};;
( *${optchar}:* ) { # required argument
argtype=required
if [ -n "${suffix}" ]; then
arg="${suffix}"
shift
else
case "$2" in
( -* ) exiterr 1 "$1 requires an argument";;
( ?* ) arg="$2"; shift 2;;
( * ) exiterr 1 "$1 requires an argument";;
esac
fi
};;
( *${optchar}* ) { # no argument
argtype=none
arg=
shift
# Handle multiple no-argument parameters combined as
# -xyz instead of -x -y -z. If we have just shifted
# parameter -xyz, we now replace it with -yz (which
# will be processed in the next iteration).
if [ -n "${suffix}" ]; then
eval "set -- $(save "-${suffix}")$(save "$@")"
fi
};;
( * ) exiterr 1 "Unknown option $1";;
esac
};;
# process long option
( --?* ) { # --xarg[=foo]
suffix=${1#*=} # foo (unless there was no =)
if [ "${suffix}" = "$1" ]; then
suffix=
fi
opt=${1%=$suffix} # --xarg
optword=${opt#--} # xarg
case ",${longopts}," in
( *,${optword}::,* ) { # optional argument
argtype=optional
arg="${suffix}"
shift
};;
( *,${optword}:,* ) { # required argument
argtype=required
if [ -n "${suffix}" ]; then
arg="${suffix}"
shift
else
case "$2" in
( -* ) exiterr 1 \
"--${optword} requires an argument";;
( ?* ) arg="$2"; shift 2;;
( * ) exiterr 1 \
"--${optword} requires an argument";;
esac
fi
};;
( *,${optword},* ) { # no argument
if [ -n "${suffix}" ]; then
exiterr 1 "--${optword} does not take an argument"
fi
argtype=none
arg=
shift
};;
( * ) exiterr 1 "Unknown option $1";;
esac
};;
# any other parameters starting with -
( -* ) exiterr 1 "Unknown option $1";;
# remember non-option parameters
( * ) nonopt="${nonopt}$(save "$1")"; shift;;
esac
if [ -n "${opt}" ]; then
getopt="${getopt}$(save "$opt")"
case "${argtype}" in
( optional|required ) {
getopt="${getopt}$(save "$arg")"
};;
esac
fi
done
# Generate function output, suitable for:
# eval "set -- $(posix_getopt ...)"
printf %s "${getopt}"
if [ -n "${nonopt}" ]; then
printf %s "$(save "--")${nonopt}"
fi
}
使用示例:
# Process command line options
shortopts="hvd:c::s::L:D"
longopts="help,version,directory:,client::,server::,load:,delete"
#opts=$(getopt -o "$shortopts" -l "$longopts" -n "$(basename $0)" -- "$@")
opts=$(posix_getopt "$shortopts" "$longopts" "$@")
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
#eval set -- ${opts}
eval "set -- ${opts}"
while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
case "$1" in
( -- ) shift; break;;
( -h|--help ) help=1; shift; break;;
( -v|--version ) version_help=1; shift; break;;
( -d|--directory ) dir=$2; shift 2;;
( -c|--client ) useclient=1; client=$2; shift 2;;
( -s|--server ) startserver=1; server_name=$2; shift 2;;
( -L|--load ) load=$2; shift 2;;
( -D|--delete ) delete=1; shift;;
esac
done
else
shorthelp=1 # getopt returned (and reported) an error.
fi
内置的getopts只解析短选项(ksh93除外), 但是您仍然可以添加几行脚本来使getopts处理长选项。
以下是在http://www.uxora.com/unix/shell-script/22-handle-long-options-with-getopts中找到的部分代码
#== set short options ==#
SCRIPT_OPTS=':fbF:B:-:h'
#== set long options associated with short one ==#
typeset -A ARRAY_OPTS
ARRAY_OPTS=(
[foo]=f
[bar]=b
[foobar]=F
[barfoo]=B
[help]=h
[man]=h
)
#== parse options ==#
while getopts ${SCRIPT_OPTS} OPTION ; do
#== translate long options to short ==#
if [[ "x$OPTION" == "x-" ]]; then
LONG_OPTION=$OPTARG
LONG_OPTARG=$(echo $LONG_OPTION | grep "=" | cut -d'=' -f2)
LONG_OPTIND=-1
[[ "x$LONG_OPTARG" = "x" ]] && LONG_OPTIND=$OPTIND || LONG_OPTION=$(echo $OPTARG | cut -d'=' -f1)
[[ $LONG_OPTIND -ne -1 ]] && eval LONG_OPTARG="\$$LONG_OPTIND"
OPTION=${ARRAY_OPTS[$LONG_OPTION]}
[[ "x$OPTION" = "x" ]] && OPTION="?" OPTARG="-$LONG_OPTION"
if [[ $( echo "${SCRIPT_OPTS}" | grep -c "${OPTION}:" ) -eq 1 ]]; then
if [[ "x${LONG_OPTARG}" = "x" ]] || [[ "${LONG_OPTARG}" = -* ]]; then
OPTION=":" OPTARG="-$LONG_OPTION"
else
OPTARG="$LONG_OPTARG";
if [[ $LONG_OPTIND -ne -1 ]]; then
[[ $OPTIND -le $Optnum ]] && OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND+1 ))
shift $OPTIND
OPTIND=1
fi
fi
fi
fi
#== options follow by another option instead of argument ==#
if [[ "x${OPTION}" != "x:" ]] && [[ "x${OPTION}" != "x?" ]] && [[ "${OPTARG}" = -* ]]; then
OPTARG="$OPTION" OPTION=":"
fi
#== manage options ==#
case "$OPTION" in
f ) foo=1 bar=0 ;;
b ) foo=0 bar=1 ;;
B ) barfoo=${OPTARG} ;;
F ) foobar=1 && foobar_name=${OPTARG} ;;
h ) usagefull && exit 0 ;;
: ) echo "${SCRIPT_NAME}: -$OPTARG: option requires an argument" >&2 && usage >&2 && exit 99 ;;
? ) echo "${SCRIPT_NAME}: -$OPTARG: unknown option" >&2 && usage >&2 && exit 99 ;;
esac
done
shift $((${OPTIND} - 1))
下面是一个测试:
# Short options test
$ ./foobar_any_getopts.sh -bF "Hello world" -B 6 file1 file2
foo=0 bar=1
barfoo=6
foobar=1 foobar_name=Hello world
files=file1 file2
# Long and short options test
$ ./foobar_any_getopts.sh --bar -F Hello --barfoo 6 file1 file2
foo=0 bar=1
barfoo=6
foobar=1 foobar_name=Hello
files=file1 file2
另外,在最近的Korn Shell ksh93中,getopts可以自然地解析长选项,甚至显示类似的手册页。(参见http://www.uxora.com/unix/shell-script/20-getopts-with-man-page-and-long-options)